* quickjs-eval.js has been generated using https://github.com/mozilla/pdf.js.quickjs/
* lazy load of sandbox code
* Rewrite tests to use the sandbox
* Add a task `watch-sandbox` which update bundle pdf.sandbox.js on change in the sandbox code
Given that it's generally faster to call *one* function and have it loop through an object, rather than looping through an object and calling a function for every iteration, this patch will reduce the total time spent in `PDFViewerApplication._readPreferences` ever so slightly.
Also, over time we've been adding more and more preferences, rather than removing them, so using the new `AppOptions.setAll` method should be generally beneficial as well.
While the effect of these changes is quite small, it does reduces the time it takes for the preferences to be fully initialized. Given the amount of asynchronous code during viewer initialization, every bit of time that we can save should thus help.
Especially considering the recently added `viewerCssTheme` preference, which needs to be read very early to reduce the risk of the viewer UI "flashing" visibly as the theme changes, I figured that a couple of small patches reducing the time spend reading preferences cannot hurt.
Given that only two debugging hash parameters (i.e. `disableWorker` and `pdfBug`) will make this method asynchronous, we can avoid what's most of the time is an unnecessary `Promise.all` invocation.
While this does work pretty well in my quick testing, it's *very much* a hack since as far as I can tell there's no support in the CSS specification for using e.g. a CSS variable to override a `@media (prefers-color-scheme: dark) {...}` block.
The solution implemented here is thus to *edit* the viewer CSS, by either removing the entire `@media ...` block in light-mode or by ensuring that its rules become *unconditionally* applied in dark-mode.
To simplify the overall implementation, since all of this does seem like somewhat of an edge-case, the `viewerCssTheme` preference will *only* be read during viewer initialization. (Similar to many other existing preferences, a reload is thus required when changing it.)
Originally the default preferences were defined in a JSON-file checked into the repository, which was loaded using SystemJS in development mode.
Over the years a number of changes have been made to this code, most notably:
- The preferences JSON-file is now generated automatically, during building, from the `AppOptions` abstraction.
- All SystemJS usage has been removed from the development viewer.
Hence the default preferences are now available *synchronously* even in the development viewer, and it's thus no longer necessary to defer to the microtask queue (since `getDefaultPreferences` is async) just to get the default preferences.
While the effect of these changes is quite small, it *does* reduces the time it takes for the preferences to be fully initialized. Given the amount of asynchronous code during viewer initialization, every bit of time that we can save should thus help.
- Add support for logical assignment operators, i.e. `&&=`, `||=`, and `??=`, with a Babel-plugin. Given that these required incrementing the ECMAScript version in the ESLint and Acorn configurations, and that platform/browser support is still fairly limited, always transpiling them seems appropriate for now.
- Cache the `hasJSActions` promise in the API, similar to the existing `getAnnotations` caching. With this implemented, the lookup should now be cheap enough that it can be called unconditionally in the viewer.
- Slightly improve cleanup of resources when destroying the `WorkerTransport`.
- Remove the `annotationStorage`-property from the `PDFPageView` constructor, since it's not necessary and also brings it more inline with the `BaseViewer`.
- Update the `BaseViewer.createAnnotationLayerBuilder` method to actaually agree with the `IPDFAnnotationLayerFactory` interface.[1]
- Slightly tweak a couple of JSDoc comments.
---
[1] We probably ought to re-factor both the `IPDFTextLayerFactory` and `IPDFAnnotationLayerFactory` interfaces to take parameter objects instead, since especially the `IPDFAnnotationLayerFactory` one is becoming quite unwieldy. Given that that would likely be a breaking change for any custom viewer-components implementation, this probably requires careful deprecation.
*Note that I wasn't able to reproduce the issue in Firefox, but only in Chromium-browsers.*
The bug, and it's feels almost trivial once you've found it, is that we're not passing the `transform` parameter as intended to `PDFPageProxy.render` when drawing thumbnails on HiDPI displays. Instead the canvas context is, for reasons that I don't even pretent to understand, *manually* scaled in `PDFThumbnailView._getPageDrawContext`, which thus doesn't guarantee that the `baseTransform` property on the `CanvasGraphics`-instances becomes correct.
The solution is really simple though, just handle the `transform` the same way in `PDFThumbnailView.draw` as in `PDFPageView.paintOnCanvas` and things should just work.
*This is a pre-existing issue that I noticed while working on PR 12613, and fixing this also brings the thumbnail code inline with the page code.*
Given the intermittent nature of all of this, it's somewhat difficult to reproduce it consistently; however the following steps should at least provide an outline:
1. Open the sidebar, and the thumbnailView, and start scrolling around.
2. *Quickly* close the sidebar, so that all thumbnails won't have time to finish rendering.
3. Either wait for the cleanup-timeout to occur, or simply run `PDFViewerApplication.cleanup()` in the console.
What *intermittently* happens here is that `WorkerTransport.startCleanup` rejects, and consequently that cleanup doesn't complete as intended, since some of the thumbnails are left in a *pending* renderingState[1].
Fixing this is simple though, and only requires updating `PDFThumbnailViewer.cleanup` along the lines of `BaseViewer.cleanup`.
---
[1] Keep in mind that thumbnails will *only* render when the thumbnailView is visible, to reduce resource usage.
This patch will help reduce memory usage, especially for longer documents, when the user scrolls around in the thumbnailView (in the sidebar).
Note how the `PDFPageProxy.cleanup` method will, assuming it's safe to do so, release main-thread resources associated with the page. These include things such as e.g. image data (which can be arbitrarily large), and also the operatorList (which can also be quite large).
Hence when pages are evicted from the `PDFPageViewBuffer`, on the `BaseViewer`-instance, the `PDFPageView.destroy` method is invoked which will (among other things) call `PDFPageProxy.cleanup` in the API.
However, looking at the `PDFThumbnailViewer`/`PDFThumbnailView` classes you'll notice that there's no attempt to ever call `PDFPageProxy.cleanup`, which implies that in certain circumstances we'll essentially keep all resources allocated permanently on the `PDFPageProxy`-instances in the API.
In particular, this happens when the users opens the sidebar and starts scrolling around in the thumbnails. Generally speaking you obviously need to keep all thumbnail *images* around, since otherwise the thumbnailView is useless, but there's still room for improvement here.
Please note that the case where a *rendered page* is used to create the thumbnail is (obviously) completely unaffected by the issues described above, and this rather only applies to thumbnails being explicitly rendered by the `PDFThumbnailView.draw` method.
For the latter case, we can fix these issues simply by calling `PDFPageProxy.cleanup` once rendering has finished. To prevent *accidentally* pulling the rug out from under `PDFPageViewBuffer` in the viewer, which expects data to be available, this required adding a couple of new methods[1] to enable checking that it's indeed safe to call `PDFPageProxy.cleanup` from the `PDFThumbnailView.draw` method.
It's really quite fascinating that no one has noticed this issue before, since it's been around since basically "forever".
---
[1] While it should be *very* rare for `PDFThumbnailView.draw` to be called for a pageView that's also in the `PDFPageViewBuffer`, given that pages are rendered before thumbnails and that the *rendered page* is used to create the thumbnail, it can still happen since rendering is asynchronous.
Furthermore, it's also possible for `PDFThumbnailView.setImage` to be disabled, in which case checking the `PDFPageViewBuffer` for active pageViews *really* matters.
* When no actions then set it to null instead of empty object
* Even if a field has no actions, it needs to listen to events from the sandbox in order to be updated if an action changes something in it.
Note that a number of these cases are covered by existing unit-tests, and a few others only matter for the development/build scripts.
Furthermore, I've also tried to the best of my ability to test each case *manually* to hopefully further reduce the likelihood of this patch introducing any bugs.
Please find additional details about the ESLint rule at https://eslint.org/docs/rules/no-useless-escape
Given the number of parameters, and the fact that many of them are booleans, the call-sites are no longer particularly easy to read and understand. Furthermore, this slightly improves the formatting of the JSDoc-comment, since it needed updating as part of these changes anyway.
Finally, this removes an unnecessary `numViews === 0` check from `getVisibleElements`, since that should be *very* rare and more importantly that the `binarySearchFirstItem` function already has a fast-path for that particular case.
This patch addresses a review comment, which pointed out that we should *also* handle the pageNumber-input, from PR 12493.
Given that a user *manually* changing pages using the pageNumber-input, on the toolbar, could be regarded as a pretty strong indication of user-intent w.r.t. navigation in the document, hence I suppose that updating the browser history in this case as well probably won't hurt.
All of these methods will, in one way or another, cause e.g. scrolling or zooming to occur and consequently they don't really make sense unless there's an active PDF document. Especially since all of these methods end up calling into a `BaseViewer`-instance, which already contains similar early returns in essentially all of it's methods and setters.
This fixes only those warnings, as reported by https://lgtm.com/projects/g/mozilla/pdf.js?mode=list, that make sense (as far as I'm concerned).
Hence this patch leaves the following things unaddressed:
- The "recommendation"-category, since it only complains about unused variables. However, note that all of those cases are purposely included and that there's thus ESLint-disable comments added to explictly allow them.
- The "warning"-category, which still contains two complaints. However, as far as I can tell, they are both false positives.
Given first of all the false positives of the LGTM static analyzer, and secondly that we'd need to add (essentially duplicated) disable-comments for the unused variable cases, it's not entirely clear to me if we actually want to work towards including LGTM in the PDF.js project (e.g. running alongside Travis) or if we should just close issue 11965.
Given that we're now accessing certain API-functionality *directly* in this file, e.g. the AnnotationStorage and Optional Content configuration, ensuring that there's not a version mismatch definitely seem like a good idea to prevent any *subtle* future bugs.
Ensure that these tooltip-only Annotations are handled as "internalLink"s, to ensure that they behave as expected in PresentationMode (e.g. they should still use a `pointer`-cursor).
Ensure that `PDFLinkService.getDestinationHash` won't create links with empty hashes, since those don't really make a lot of sense in general (this improves things for tooltip-only Annotations).
This PDF file can be used for testing: http://mirrors.ctan.org/macros/latex/contrib/pdfcomment/doc/pdfcomment.pdf#page=14
- Return early in `PDFViewerApplication._initializeJavaScript` for PDF documents without any `fieldObjects`, which is the vast majority of all documents, to prevent errors when trying to parse a non-existent object.
- Similar to the other `PDFViewerApplication._initialize*` methods, ignore the `fieldObjects` if the document was closed before the data resolved.
- Fix the JSDoc comment for the `generateRandomStringForSandbox` helper function, since there's currently a bit too much copy-and-paste going on :-)
- Change `FirefoxScripting` to a class with static methods, which is consistent with the surrounding code in `web/firefoxcom.js`.
There's no compelling reason to update this property *manually* in multiple places, since that's error-prone with any future code changes, given that `_updateInternalState` is always called just before anyway.
While the referenced issue could very well be seen as an edge-case, this patch adds support for updating of the browser history when interacting with the thumbnails in the sidebar (assuming we want to do this).
The main reason for adding the history implementation in the first place, was to simplify navigating back to a previous position in the document when named/explicit destinations are used (e.g. when clicking on "links" or when using the outline in the sidebar).
As such, it never really crossed by mind to update the browser history when the thumbnails are used. However, a user clicking on thumbnails could be regarded as a pretty strong indication of user-intent w.r.t. navigation in the document, hence I suppose that updating the browser history in this particular case probably won't hurt.
This modernizes and improves the code, by using `async`/`await` and by extracting the helper function to its own method.
To hopefully avoid confusion, given the next patch, the method is also re-named to `goToDestination` to make is slightly clearer what it actually does.
Given that we're no longer using SystemJS to load the `web/` files, see PR 11919, there's nothing that prevents us from using standard `ìmport` statements in this file.
Obviously it's still necessary to load part of the code conditionally on the build type, however this still allows us to clean-up and simplify at least some of this file.
The `debugger`-statement would only, potentially, make sense during development and we thus want to prevent it from being accidentally included when landing code.
The `alert`, `confirm`, and `prompt` functions should generally be avoided, with the few intended cases manually allowed.
Please find additional details about the ESLint rules at:
- https://eslint.org/docs/rules/no-debugger
- https://eslint.org/docs/rules/no-alert
In the rest of the viewer code-base, we purposely don't treat `RenderingCancelledException`s as actual errors (since they aren't) and consequently we never log them.
Hence it makes sense, as far as I'm concerned, to simply treat `RenderingCancelledException`s the same way when printing in Firefox.
While I don't print a whole lot, I cannot remember seeing these "errors" logged when printing until *very* recently[1]. Given that the browser print functionality and UI, in Firefox, is under active development it's certainly possible that there's some recent changes to the related timings which make `RenderingCancelledException`s more likely now.
---
[1] Interestingly, only some PDF documents seem to be affected as well; I'm able to reproduce this pretty consistently by opening https://www.uni-muenster.de/imperia/md/content/ziv/pdf/printpay_flyer.pdf in Firefox and then repeating the following sequence:
Clicking on the PDF.js print button, and then cancelling printing.
This should be helpful to easily determine the *exact* version of the viewer itself, when looking at a *built* `web/viewer.js` file.
Note that we're already including this information in other built files, such as e.g. `pdf.js`, `pdf.worker.js`, `pdf_viewer.js`, and `pdf.image_decoders.js`.
This adds a new `PDFViewerApplication.triggerPrinting` method, which takes care of checking that printing is actually supported before calling `window.print`, to remove the need to duplicate that code in multiple places.
Also, removes the `PDFViewerApplication.printing` getter since it's not really necessary any more.
For now we need to use a Babel-plugin, since part of our build system doesn't support this fully (e.g. Babel-loader, Webpack 4.x, and SystemJS).
While the `?.` operator will thus always be transpiled by Babel, even in modern builds, simply supporting it for development purposes seems like a step in the right direction.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Operators/Optional_chaining
Given how those are used, there *should* not be any situation in which e.g. `undefined` is ever returned. However, actually checking that the pageView/thumbnail is defined cannot hurt.
Also, re-factor `webViewerPageRendered` slightly since the `pageView` is no longer unconditionally necessary after the previous patches; note in particular that the thumbnails will only be updated when the sidebar *and* the thumbnailView is visible.
Finally, fixes a bug in `webViewerPageChanging` whereby an empty string would not be treated as a valid pageLabel and instead be replaced by `null`.
