One of the motivations for using `setAttribute` in the first place was to support more efficient DOM updates in the `expandTextDivs` method, since performance of the `enhanceTextSelection` mode can be somewhat bad when there's a lot of `textDivs` on the page.
With recent `TextLayer` changes/optimizations it's no longer necessary to store a complete `style`-string for every `textDiv`, and we can thus re-visit the `setAttribute` usage.
Note that with the current code, in `appendText`, there's only *one* string per `textDiv` which avoids a bunch of temporary strings. While the changes in this patch means that there's now *three* strings per `textDiv` instead, the total length of these strings are now quite a bit shorter (42 characters to be exact).
*This should obviously have been done in PR 11097, but for some reason I completely overlooked it; sorry about that.*
There's no good reason to update the font unless you're actually going to measure the width of the textContent. This can reduce unnecessary font switching a fair bit, even for documents which are somewhat simple/short (in e.g. the `tracemonkey.pdf` file this cuts the amount of font switches almost in half).
For performance reasons single-char text divs aren't being scaled, as outlined in a comment in `appendText`. Hence it doesn't seem necessary, or even a good idea, to unconditionally measuring the width of the text in `_layoutText`.
This major version bump required two changes:
- The global line in the mobile viewer example should be removed because
the `.eslintrc` file already defines these globals and with the new
`eslint` version we otherwise get an error saying "'pdfjsLib' is already
defined as a built-in global variable".
- The ECMA version for the examples must be set to 6 since we're using
modules, otherwise we get an error saying "sourceType 'module' is not
supported when ecmaVersion < 2015". It turns out that the previous
version of `eslint` already used ECMA version 6 silently even though
we set 5, see https://github.com/eslint/eslint/issues/9687#issuecomment-432413384,
so in terms of our code nothing really changes.
These functions aren't returning anything, now that they're using `ReadableStream`s, and it thus doesn't seem necessary to re-throw errors (also given the console message that's caused by it).
*Please note:* The majority of this patch was written by Yury, and it's simply been rebased and slightly extended to prevent issues when dealing with `RenderingCancelledException`.
By leveraging streams this (finally) provides a simple way in which parsing can be aborted on the worker-thread, which will ultimately help save resources.
With this patch worker-thread parsing will *only* be aborted when the document is destroyed, and not when rendering is cancelled. There's a couple of reasons for this:
- The API currently expects the *entire* OperatorList to be extracted, or an Error to occur, once it's been started. Hence additional re-factoring/re-writing of the API code will be necessary to properly support cancelling and re-starting of OperatorList parsing in cases where the `lastChunk` hasn't yet been seen.
- Even with the above addressed, immediately cancelling when encountering a `RenderingCancelledException` will lead to worse performance in e.g. the default viewer. When zooming and/or rotation of the document occurs it's very likely that `cancel` will be (almost) immediately followed by a new `render` call. In that case you'd obviously *not* want to abort parsing on the worker-thread, since then you'd risk throwing away a partially parsed Page and thus be forced to re-parse it again which will regress perceived performance.
- This patch is already *somewhat* risky, given that it touches fundamentally important/critical code, and trying to keep it somewhat small should hopefully reduce the risk of regressions (and simplify reviewing as well).
Time permitting, once this has landed and been in Nightly for awhile, I'll try to work on the remaining points outlined above.
Co-Authored-By: Yury Delendik <ydelendik@mozilla.com>
Co-Authored-By: Jonas Jenwald <jonas.jenwald@gmail.com>
Furthermore, it's possible to re-use the same Array for all `textDiv`s on the page and the resulting padding string also becomes a lot more compact.
Please note that the `paddingLeft` branch was moved, since the padding values need to be ordered as `top, right, bottom, left`.
Finally, with this re-factoring it's no longer necessary to cache the original `style` string for every `textDiv` when `enhanceTextSelection` is enabled.
Given that browsers will reject padding values smaller than zero (which may be caused by limited numerical precision during calculations in the `expand` code), it makes no sense to include those when expanding the `textDiv`s.
Given that the different types of `Stream`s will never be cached, this thus implies that the `XRef.cache` Array will *always* be more-or-less sparse.
Generally speaking, the longer the document the more sparse the `XRef.cache` will thus become. For example, looking at the `pdf.pdf` file from the test-suite: The length of the `XRef.cache` Array will be a few hundred thousand elements, with approximately 95% of them being empty.
Hence it seems pretty clear that an Array isn't really the best data-structure for this kind of cache, and this patch thus changes it to a Map instead.
This patch-series was tested using the PDF file from issue 2618, i.e. http://bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=226471, with the following manifest file:
```
[
{ "id": "issue2618",
"file": "../web/pdfs/issue2618.pdf",
"md5": "",
"rounds": 200,
"type": "eq"
}
]
```
which gave the following results when comparing this patch-series against the `master` branch:
```
-- Grouped By browser, stat --
browser | stat | Count | Baseline(ms) | Current(ms) | +/- | % | Result(P<.05)
------- | ------------ | ----- | ------------ | ----------- | --- | ----- | -------------
Firefox | Overall | 200 | 2736 | 2736 | 1 | 0.02 |
Firefox | Page Request | 200 | 2 | 2 | 0 | -8.26 | faster
Firefox | Rendering | 200 | 2733 | 2734 | 1 | 0.03 |
```
The relevant methods are usually not hot enough for these changes to have an easily measurable effect, however there's been a lot of other cases where similiar inlining has helped performance. (And these changes may help offset the changes made in the next patch.)
For very large and complex PDF files this will help performance *slightly*, since `Parser.getObj` is called *a lot* during parsing in the worker.
This patch was tested using the PDF file from issue 2618, i.e. http://bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=226471, with the following manifest file:
```
[
{ "id": "issue2618",
"file": "../web/pdfs/issue2618.pdf",
"md5": "",
"rounds": 200,
"type": "eq"
}
]
```
which gave the following results when comparing this patch against the `master` branch:
```
-- Grouped By browser, stat --
browser | stat | Count | Baseline(ms) | Current(ms) | +/- | % | Result(P<.05)
------- | ------------ | ----- | ------------ | ----------- | --- | ----- | -------------
Firefox | Overall | 200 | 2847 | 2830 | -17 | -0.60 | faster
Firefox | Page Request | 200 | 2 | 2 | 0 | -7.14 |
Firefox | Rendering | 200 | 2844 | 2827 | -17 | -0.60 | faster
```
Looking at this again, it struck me that added functionality in `Util.intersect` is probably more confusing than helpful in general; sorry about the churn in this code!
Based on the parameter name you'd probably expect it to only match when the intersection is `[0, 0, 0, 0]` and not when only one component is zero, hence the `skipEmpty` parameter thus feels too tightly coupled to the `Page.view` getter.
This was added in PR 4470, but doesn't appear to have been used since.
While it's certainly easy to understand how this was helpful during development of that PR, actually providing this hash parameter isn't going to work anymore given that the original CMap files were also removed from the repository.
I suppose that the hash parameter *could* be useful if you'd attempt to update the BCMap files, however that hasn't been attempted even once in over *five* years time. Furthermore, at this point using the `AppOptions` directly in that situation should also work fine.
All in all, this seems like a piece of old and unused code which we can simply remove now.
