Given the differences between XFA documents and "normal" PDF documents, we don't support editing of the former ones. Hence, when a XFA-document is opened, we temporarily disable the editor-buttons.
- Ensure that the modified-warning won't be displayed, when navigating away from the viewer, if the user has added custom Annotations and then *removed all* of them.
- Ensure that the *initial* editor-buttons state, i.e. the `toggled`-class, is correctly displayed in the toolbar when then viewer loads.
- Tweak the CSS-classes for the editor-buttons, such that they use the correct focus/hover-rules (similar to the sidebar-buttons).
- Remove a no longer accurate comment from the `BaseViewer.annotationEditorMode`-setter.
- Address a couple of *smaller* outstanding review comments, including some re-formatting changes, from PR 14976.
In PR 14710 we only included the JavaScript-part of the polyfill, however we probably need to include the CSS as well to reduce the risk of problems in older browsers.
With the recent CSS-related improvements in the `preprocess`-function we could probably have included this conditionally in the `viewer.css` file. However, considering that the `<dialog>` polyfill-code is only invoked when actually needed it seemed most appropriate/correct to lazy-load the polyfill-CSS as well.
- right now we're using the font size from the pdf itself but we use an other font
in the annotation layer. So this size doesn't really make sense and leads to bad
rendering (see pdf in #14928);
- use a sans-serif font for the fields containing text (fix issue #14736);
- remove useless padding in text-based fields (fix issue #14301);
- text fields allow/disallow scrolling bars (see bit 24 in Ff entry), so use this
value to hide/show scrollbars in annotation layer.
- it aims to fix https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1771477;
- hangul contains some syllables which are decomposed when using NFD, hence
the text must be correctly shifted in case it contains some of them.
Currently, when range-requests and/or streaming are not supported or for documents opened from `data`-URLs, we'll manually set the `contentDispositionFilename` (assuming it exists and is valid) from the `onOpenWithData`-callback in `PDFViewerApplication.initPassiveLoading`.
However, because of a small oversight in `PDFViewerApplication._initializeMetadata`, this *cached* `contentDispositionFilename` would be ignored and we'd only attempt to use the one returned by `PDFDocumentProxy.getMetadata` in the API (which in the cases outlined above will always be empty).
Also, to ensure that the document properties dialog always displays the *correct* fileName we'll now lookup it using the same exact method as in the viewer itself (via a new callback-function).
With the exception of `isThumbnailViewVisible`, these getters are completely unused. Generally speaking, using the `visibleView`-getter directly works just as well and seems (at least to me) to be overall preferable considering how our classes are usually implemented.
Currently, when non-standard `pageColors` are specified, the thumbnails will look inconsistent depending on how they're created.
The thumbnails that are created by downsizing the *page* canvases will obviously use the `pageColors` as intended, however the thumbnails which are rendered *directly* will always use the default colors.
Over time, as we've been introducing JavaScript code to modify CSS variables, we've been adding shorthand properties to various classes to reduce unnecessary repetition when accessing the document-styles.
Rather than repeating this in multiple places, it seems overall simpler to just introduce a constant and re-use that throughout the viewer instead.
After the changes in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1757771, that simplified the MOZCENTRAL downloading code, the `ChromeActions.download`-method will no longer invoke the `sendResponse`-callback.
Hence it should no longer be necessary for the `DownloadManager`, in the MOZCENTRAL viewer, to use `FirefoxCom.requestAsync` since no response is ever provided.[1] For the allocated BlobURLs, they should (hopefully) be released when navigating away from the viewer.
---
[1] Note that that was *already* the case, for one of the previous code-paths in the `ChromeActions.download`-method.
After the changes in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1757771, that simplified the MOZCENTRAL downloading code, the `sourceEventType` is now completely unused and should thus be removed (in my opinion).
Furthermore, with these changes, we also no longer need a *separate* internal "save"-event and can instead just use the older "download"-event everywhere.
The original `ProgressBar`-functionality is very old, and could thus do with some general clean-up.
In particular, while it currently accepts various options those have never really been used in either the default viewer or in any examples. The sort of "styling" that these options provided are *much better*, not to mention simpler, done directly with CSS rules.
As part of these changes, the "progress" is now updated using CSS variables rather than by directly modifying the `style` of DOM elements. This should hopefully simplify future changes to this code, see e.g. PR 14898.
Finally, this also fixes a couple of other small things in the "mobile viewer" example.
While zeroing the temporary `canvas` makes sense, manually clearing the canvas and its context doesn't really accomplish anything since those are tied to the scope of the method.
We need to wait for UI rendering to start *before* getting the CSS variable values, since otherwise the values will be `NaN`.
This is only an issue if the viewer is completely hidden during loading, e.g. in a `display: none` iframe-element.
*This patch can be tested, in the viewer, using the `annotation-fileattachment.pdf` document from the test-suite.*
It seems that the code to delay dispatching of the "attachmentsloaded"-event, when `attachmentsCount === 0`, is now effectively broken.[1]
Rather than only using an arbitrary timeout, the new code will instead wait for an "annotationlayerrendered"-event and only *fallback* to using a timeout.
---
[1] The timing of the annotationLayer-rendering changed slightly in PR 14247, and the old code in `PDFAttachmentViewer` wasn't good enough to handle that.
Given that the new API-option is an Object named `pageColors`, with `background`/`foreground` keys, it occurred to me that it'd be slightly more consistent if the options/preferences names fully reflected that.
An old shortcoming of the `preprocessCSS`-function is its complete lack of support for our "normal" defines, which makes it very difficult to have build-specific CSS rules. Recently we've started using specially crafted comments to remove CSS rules from the MOZCENTRAL build, but (ab)using the `preprocessCSS`-function in this way really doesn't feel great.
However, it turns out to be surprisingly simple to instead use the "regular" `preprocess`-function for the CSS files as well. The only special-handling that's still necessary is the helper-function for dealing with CSS-imports, but apart from that everything seems to just work.
One reason, as far as I can tell, for having a separate `preprocessCSS`-function was likely that we originally used *lots* of vendor-prefixed CSS rules in our CSS files. With improvements over the years, especially thanks to Autoprefixer and PostCSS, we've been able to remove *almost* all non-standard CSS rules and the need for special-casing the CSS parsing has mostly vanished.
*Please note:* As part of testing this patch I've diffed the output of `gulp generic`, `gulp mozcentral`, and `gulp chromium` against the `master`-branch to check that there was no obvious breakage.
These methods are completely unused in the Firefox PDF Viewer, and were only added to supplement the `PDFViewerApplication.{bindEvents, bindWindowEvents}`-methods since third-party implementations may apparently need to remove event listeners (see PR 8525).
However, in the MOZCENTRAL build that's just dead code and this patch reduces the size of the *built* `web/viewer.js`-file by `~3.5` kB.
*This patch can be tested, in the viewer, using the `annotation-fileattachment.pdf` document from the test-suite.*
Note how the `FileSpec`-implementation already uses `stringToPDFString` during the filename lookup, see cfac6fa511/src/core/file_spec.js (L70)
Hence there's no reason to repeat that again in the `FileAttachmentAnnotationElement`-constructor, and we can thus simplify the "fileattachmentannotation"-event handling a little bit.
This new CSS variable will allow us to simplify a couple of different viewer components, since we no longer need to use JavaScript-based hacks and can directly set the CSS rules instead. In particular:
- The `BaseViewer`-handling, used as part of the code that will center pages *vertically* in PresentationMode, can be simplified.
By using CSS to control the height of the "dummy"-page we avoid unnecessarily invalidating the scale-value, which can reduce *some* unneeded re-rendering while PresentationMode is active.
- The `SecondaryToolbar.#setMaxHeight`-method, and its associated parameters, are no longer necessary and can be completely removed.
Note that in order for things to work correctly in general, the new `--viewer-container-height` CSS variable must potentially be updated on any window-based "resize"-event (even when there's no zooming). While this is currently only done in the default viewer, that shouldn't be an issue since neither PresentationMode nor Toolbar-functionality is included in the "viewer components".
- Use Canvas & CanvasText color when they don't have their default value
as background and foreground colors.
- The colors used to draw (stroke/fill) in a pdf are replaced by the bg/fg
ones according to their luminance.
After recent changes, adding *basic* Spread mode support in PresentationMode has now become reasonably straightforward.
However, documents with *varying* page sizes are non-trivial to handle and would require re-writing (or at least re-factoring) a bunch of the zooming-code.
Hence this PR *purposely* only allow Spread modes to be used, in PresentationMode, for documents where all pages have exactly the same size. While this obviously isn't a fully complete solution, it will however cover the vast majority of all documents and should hopefully be deemed good enough for now.
In PR 14112 usage of this *internal* method was reduced, and it thus can't hurt to clean-up things a little bit more.
Note in particular that we can simplify the call-sites by directly passing in the already available `PDFPageView`-instance, since the `id`-property those contain can replace the previous `pageNumber`-parameter[1].
Given that the method name has always been prefixed with an underscore it was thus never intended to be "public", hence we can now enforce that with modern ECMAScript features.
---
[1] There's already a bunch of other spots, throughout the viewer-code, where we assume that the `PDFPageView.id`-property contains proper page *numbers* (and not e.g. indices); note how we initialize the `PDFPageView`-instances in the `BaseViewer.setDocument`-method.
Given that we're (ab)using spread-modes in order to ensure that pages are centered *vertically* in PresentationMode, this re-factoring simplifies the code slightly.
Furthermore, in the event that we *possibly* want to try and support spread-modes in PresentationMode[1] this re-factoring will also prevent future duplication.
---
[1] Note that I'm not particularly keen on doing that, since documents with varying page sizes will be annoying to handle.
There's no point in having these variables defined (implicitly) as `undefined` in e.g. the Firefox PDF Viewer.
By defining them with `var` and using ESList ignores, rather than `let`, we can move them into the relevant pre-processor block instead. Note that since the entire viewer-code is placed, by Webpack, in a top-level closure these variables will thus *not* become globally accessible.
Given that `webViewerOpenFileViaURL` only has a single call-site, and also isn't a particularly large/complex function, it doesn't seem necessary for this to be a separate function and hence it's simply inlined instead.
Also, changes the "no valid build-target was set"-case to throw unconditionally since the only way that it could ever be hit is if there are bugs in the `gulpfile`-code.
Currently we're using *both* ids and classes when specifying the button icons, which seems completely unnecessary and only serves to bloat the CSS code.
In general you always need to be careful about CSS specificity, but in these cases that should not actually be a problem.
Also, while not a button, this patch makes a similar simplification for the `pageNumber`-input.
