This changes all occurrences of `var` to `let`/`const` in this code, and updates the signature of the constructor to use object destructuring for better readability (and self documentation).
Also, `useRequestAnimationFrame` is changed to a parameter and the `typeof window` check is now done *once* rather than at every `_scheduleNext` call.
This changes all occurrences of `var` to `let`/`const` in this code, and updates the signatures of a couple of methods to use object destructuring.
Finally, when creating `InternalRenderTask` instances *only* the necessary parameter are now provided, since passing through the `RenderParameters` as-is seems completely unnecessary.
Jasmine recommends to use the `configure` method on the environment
during boot. This commit makes the code correspond to how it's done in
Jasmine's default boot file. The options dropdown in the HTML reporter
now works again after these changes, because this broke in the upgrade
to Jasmine 3, and the unit tests are executed in a random order by
default, which is important to make sure the unit tests are
self-contained and don't depend on the result of another unit test.
Rather than closing [bug 1505824](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1505824) as WONTFIX (which is my preferred solution), given how *minor* this "problem" is, it's still possible to adjust the error messages a bit.
The main point here, which is relevant even if the changes in `BaseViewer` are ultimately rejected during review, is that we'll no longer attempt to call `BaseViewer.currentPageLabel` with an empty string from `webViewerPageNumberChanged` in `app.js`.
The other changes are:
- Stop printing an error in `BaseViewer._setCurrentPageNumber`, and have it return a boolean indicating if the page is within bounds.
- Have the `BaseViewer.{currentPageNumber, currentPageLabel}` setters print their own errors for invalid pages.
- Have the `BaseViewer.currentPageLabel` setter no longer depend, indirectly, on the `BaseViewer.currentPageNumber` setter.
- Improve a couple of other error messages.
When `highlightAll` is *not* set, there's only going to be a single match per page and unconditionally calling `PDFFindController.scrollMatchIntoView` doesn't really matter.
However, when `highlightAll` is set the current code may result in a large number of unnecessary `PDFFindController.scrollMatchIntoView` calls. Since `TextLayerBuilder._renderMatches` already checks if a particular match is the selected one, for highlighting purposes, it's simple enough to also skip scrolling completely for non-selected matches.
Only scroll search results into view as a result of an actual find operation, and not when the user scrolls/zooms/rotates the document (bug 1237076, issue 6746)
Most of the code in `PDFFindController` assumes that a valid `state` always exits, hence it cannot hurt to add a simple check to avoid errors being thrown.
Currently searching, and particularily highlighting of search results, may interfere with subsequent user-interactions such as scrolling/zooming/rotating which can result in a somewhat jarring UX where the document suddenly "jumps" to a previous position.
This is especially annoying in cases where the highlighted search result isn't even visible when a user initiated scrolling/zooming/rotating happens, and there exists a couple of bugs/issues about this behaviour.
It seems reasonable, as far as I'm concerned, to treat searching as one operation and any subsequent non-search user interactions with the viewer as separate and thus not scroll the current search result into view *unless* the user is actually doing another search.
This also seems consistent with general searching in e.g. Firefox and Adobe Reader:
- Compare with "regular" searching of e.g. HTML files in Firefox, where the user scrolling and/or zooming the document will not force a currently highlighted search result to become re-scrolled into view.
- Compare also with Adobe Reader, where the user scrolling, zooming, and/or rotating the document will not force the currently highlighted search result to become re-scrolled into view.
The question is then why search highlighting was implemented this way in PDF.js to begin with. It might be that this wasn't really intended behaviour, but more a consequence of the asynchronous nature of the API. Considering that most operations, such as fetching the page, rendering it and extracting its text-content are all asynchronous; searching and highlighting of matches thus becomes asynchronous too.
However, it should be possible to track when search results have been scrolled into view and highlighted, and thus prevent these wierd "jumps" when the user interacts with the document.
*Please note:* Unfortunately this required moving the scrolling of matches back into `PDFFindController`, since I simply couldn't see any other (reasonable) way of implementing the functionality without tracking the `_shouldScroll` property in only *one* spot.
However, given that the new `PDFFindController.scrollMatchIntoView` method follows a similar pattern as `BaseViewer.scrollPageIntoView` and `PDFThumbnailViewer.scrollThumbnailIntoView`, this is hopefully deemed OK.
Given that the `_updateScrollMode`/`_updateSpreadMode` methods are "private", there's no particular reason to not just directly call `_setCurrentPageNumber`.
Note that when e.g. presentation mode is active, we fail[1] to ensure that the `pageNumber` parameter is actually an integer before calling `_setCurrentPageNumber` (that method expects the argument be an integer).
Also changes the method signature, of `scrollPageIntoView`, to use object destructuring instead.
---
[1] Most likely, this is actually *my* oversight :-)
These interfaces are already used in different files, in both the `src/core/` and `src/display/` folders, and having them reside in their own file seems a lot clearer and is also similar to the existing viewer interfaces.
As part of moving the `interface` definitions, they're also converted to ES6 classes.
First of all, note how there's currently *two* methods for checking if a certain object exists, which seems completely unwarranted.
Furthermore, the rarely used `getData` method was removed and its only callsite changed to use a combination of `PDFObjects.{has, get}` instead.
Finally, the methods were rearranged slightly, to bring the most important ones (for an API user) to the top of the class.
Currently we'll only attempt to start from the current page when a new search is done, however for 'findagain' operations we'll always continue from the last match position.
This could easily lead to confusing behaviour if the user has scrolled to a completely different part of the document. In an attempt to improve this somewhat, for repeated 'findagain' operations, we'll instead reset the position to the current page when it's *absolutely* certain that the user has scrolled.
Note that this required adding a new `BaseViewer` method, and exposing that through `PDFLinkService`, in order to check if a given page is visible.
In an attempt to avoid issues, in custom implementations of `PDFFindController`, the code checks for the existence of the `PDFLinkService.isPageVisible` method *before* using it.
Unfortunately the `PDFFindController.executeCommand` method has now become a bit more complicated than one would like, but hopefully this small change will improve the structure somewhat (especially for subsequent patches).
Remove the `attachDOMEventsToEventBus` functionality, since `EventBus` instances are able to re-dispatch events to the DOM (PR 10019, bug 1492849 follow-up)
With only *one* event now being dispatched when the scale changes, in combination with there only being two call-sites, it doesn't seem necessary to keep the helper method for dispatching the 'scalechanging' event.
Note how nowhere in the code `canvasInRendering.get()` is ever called, and that this structure is really only used to store references to `<canvas>` DOM elements.
The reason for this being a `WeakMap` is probably because at the time we weren't using `core-js` polyfills yet, and since there already existed a manually implemented `WeakMap` polyfill it was probably simpler to use that.
Please note that, given the lack of a runnable example, I'm not totally sure if this first of all is enough to *completely* address the issue as filed and second of all if we actually want this new behaviour.
Currently `PDFFindController._calculateMatch` is (indirectly) dispatching an `updatetextlayermatches` event for every *single* page of the document. For short documents, such as the `tracemonkey` file, this probably doesn't matter too much, but for documents with a couple of thousand pages it seems unfortunate.
It shouldn't be necessary, in general, to dispatch `updatetextlayermatches` events here, since that's already being taken care of in `PDFFindController._updateMatch` which is always called when a match has been found.
However, when `highlightAll` is set we still need to ensure that pages which finished rendered *before* searching begun are updated correctly.
[Regression] Ensure that "Highlight All" is propagated to all pages for 'findagain' events where the findbar was previously closed (PR 10100 follow-up)
