We're adding the action in the undo/redo stack whatever the status of the
operation was. This patch aims to add the action only when the image has been
successfully added.
When several editors are selected and the window loses and then gets back its focus,
the previously focused editor is triggering its focus callback making it the only
selected one.
This patch aims to avoid triggering the focus callback called when the main window
gets its focus back.
When moving an element in the DOM, the focus is potentially lost, so we need to make sure
that the focused element before the translation will get back its focus after it.
But we must take care to not execute any focus/blur callbacks because the user didn't
do anything which should trigger such events: it's a detail of implementation. For example,
when several editors are selected and moved, then at the end the same must be selected, so
no element receive a focus event which will set it as selected.
There are 2 rotation we've to deal with: the viewer one and the editor one.
The previous implementation was a bit complex and having to deal with these
rotation would have potentially increase it.
So this patch aims to simplify the implementation and deal with all the possible
cases.
The main idea is to transform the mouse deltas according to the rotations and then
apply the resizing in the page coordinates system.
When resizing an editor we're currently using unidirectional cursors, please refer to https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/cursor
Given that editors can (generally) be resized to become either smaller or larger, it seems overall more appropriate to use bidirectional cursors to make this clearer to the user.
Note that as mentioned in the MDN article some environments, which seems to apply to e.g. Windows 11, doesn't differentiate between the two cursor formats and simply use bidirectional ones unconditionally.
One additional benefit of these changes is that the relevant CSS rules become slightly more compact.
We obviously don't want to re-introduce any `require` usage in e.g. the viewer, since we should strive to only use native `import` statements wherever possible.[1]
Hopefully exposing e.g. the library globally in more cases won't break anything, however it's somewhat difficult for me to imagine all the ways in which third-party users may be accessing the PDF.js library. (Given the lack of a runnable test-case in the issue, I also cannot guarantee that this is enough to fully address the problem.)
---
[1] Ideally we should probably not rely on e.g. `pdfjsLib` being globally available in the *built* viewer, and rather always `import` the library instead.
Unfortunately this would require larger (possibly breaking) changes in the builds that we provide, however note that Firefox only recently got support for `import` in workers and that Webpack still only have *experimental* support for outputting "proper" modules.
This method is very old, however with the exception of the auto-print hack (when scripting is disabled) in the viewer it's never actually been used.
Most likely the idea with `PDFDocumentProxy.getJavaScript` was that it'd be useful if scripting support was added, however it turned out that it was a bit too simplistic and instead a number of new methods were added for the scripting use-cases.
