89caaf4071
There's no good reason, as far as I can tell, to duplicate the functionality of the `LoopbackPort` in the unit-tests. The only difference between the implementations is that `LoopbackPort` mimics the (native) structured cloning, however that shouldn't matter here since the tests are only sending "simple" data (strings respectively arrays with numbers). Furthermore the patch also changes `LoopbackPort` to default to using "structured cloning" and deferred invocation of the listeners, since native typed array support is now a requirement for using the PDF.js library. |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
chromium | ||
features | ||
font | ||
pdfs | ||
resources | ||
stats | ||
ttx | ||
unit | ||
.eslintrc | ||
.gitignore | ||
annotation_layer_builder_overrides.css | ||
downloadutils.js | ||
driver.js | ||
test_manifest.json | ||
test_slave.html | ||
test.js | ||
testutils.js | ||
text_layer_test.css | ||
webbrowser.js | ||
webserver.js |