Rather than forcing the "regular" `EventBus` to check and handle `isInAutomation` for every `dispatch` call, we can take advantage of subclassing instead.
Hence this PR introduces a new `AutomationEventBus` class, which extends `EventBus`, and is used by the default viewer when `isInAutomation === true`.
- it aims to fix https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1722036.
- AS and V should share the same value for checkbox: it's at least what the specs say;
- the pdf in the above bug opens correctly in Acrobat so it likely means that AS is chosen over V.
By using CSS variables to set the width of the zoom dropdown, we can simplify both the relevant CSS and JS code. This will not only improve overall maintainability of this code, but should also make it (slightly) easier for third-party users that want to customize the width.
Note in particular that by having the code in `Toolbar._adjustScaleWidth` lookup the values of the CSS variables, we no longer need to worry about keeping hard-coded values up-to-date with the CSS rules.
- it aims to fix#14024.
- this patch adds an attribute `acroformExportValue` to the HTML input in order to set the checked attribute in taking into account the exportValue for the checkboxes with the same name.
*Please note:* All of this feels very handwavy, but at least it passes all tests locally. Hopefully we have enough tests for this part of the font code.
For non-embedded composite standard fonts with an "incomplete" /CIDToGIDMap, we'll now fallback to an *explicitly defined* /ToUnicode map even when that one happens to be an /Identity-H or /Identity-V map.
The `Font.fallbackToSystemFont` method is unfortunately getting more and more special-cases, however that might be unavoidable given all the weird non-embedded fonts found in the wild :-(
While these types apparently makes sense in TypeScript environments, we really don't want to extend the *public* API by simply exporting the relevant classes directly in `src/pdf.js` (since they should never be called/initialized manually).
Please see e.g. issue 12384 where this was first requested, and note that a possible work-around was also provided there. This patch simply implements that work-around[1], which will hopefully be helpful to TypeScript users.
---
[1] Based on the discussion in PR 13957, the two previous patches appear to be necessary for this to actually work.
*This fixes something that I noticed, having recently looked at both the `Lexer.getObj` and `writeValue` code.*
Please note that I unfortunately don't have an example of a form where saving fails without this patch. However, given its overall simplicity and that unit-tests are added, it's hopefully deemed useful to fix this potential issue pro-actively rather than waiting for a bug report.
At this point one might, and rightly so, wonder if there's actually any real-world PDF documents where a `null` value is being used?
Unfortunately the answer is *yes*, and we have a couple of examples in the test-suite (although none of those are related to forms); please see: `issue1015`, `issue2642`, `issue10402`, `issue12823`, `issue13823`, and `pr12564`.
While some of the output looks worse to my eye, this behavior more
closely matches what I see when I open the PDFs in Adobe acrobat.
Fixes: #4706, #9713, #8245, #1344
Currently it's possible to accidentally, e.g. by simply copy-and-pasting from an existing test-case, add an unnecessary `"link": true`-entry for locally available PDF files.
This leads to inconsistencies in the manifest file, and doesn't feel like a great developer experience. However we can easily fix it by having `verifyManifestFiles` fail in this situation, and doing so actually turned up a couple of existing cases.
Similar to other viewer components, e.g. the `PDFFindBar` and `PDFPresentationMode`, there's no need to create a `PDFHistory`-instance when it's not going to be used.
The `MessageHandler`-implementation already handles either of these callbacks being undefined, hence there's no particular reason (as far as I can tell) to add no-op functions here.
Also, in a couple of `MessageHandler`-methods, utilize an already existing local variable more.
Following the STR in the issue, this patch reduces the number of `PartialEvaluator.getTextContent`-related `postMessage`-calls by approximately 78 percent.[1]
Note that by enforcing a relatively low value when batching text chunks, we should thus improve worst-case scenarios while not negatively affect all `textLayer` building.
While working on these changes I noticed, thanks to our unit-tests, that the implementation of the `appendEOL` function unfortunately means that the number and content of the textItems could actually be affected by the particular chunking used.
That seems *extremely* unfortunate, since in practice this means that the particular chunking used is thus observable through the API. Obviously that should be a completely internal implementation detail, which is why this patch also modifies `appendEOL` to mitigate that.[2]
Given that this patch adds a *minimum* batch size in `enqueueChunk`, there's obviously nothing preventing it from becoming a lot larger then the limit (depending e.g. on the PDF structure and the CPU load/speed).
While sending more text chunks at once isn't an issue in itself, it could become problematic at the main-thread during `textLayer` building. Note how both the `PartialEvaluator` and `CanvasGraphics` implementations utilize `Date.now()`-checks, to prevent long-running parsing/rendering from "hanging" the respective thread. In the `textLayer` building we don't utilize such a construction[3], and streaming of textContent is thus essentially acting as a *simple* stand-in for that functionality.
Hence why we want to avoid choosing a too large minimum batch size, since that could thus indirectly affect main-thread performance negatively.
---
[1] While it'd be possible to go even lower, that'd likely require more invasive re-factoring/changes to the `PartialEvaluator.getTextContent`-code to ensure that the batches don't become too large.
[2] This should also, as far as I can tell, explain some of the regressions observed in the "enhance" text-selection tests back in PR 13257.
Looking closer at the `appendEOL` function it should potentially be changed even more, however that should probably not be done here.
[3] I'd really like to avoid implementing something like that for the `textLayer` building as well, given that it'd require adding a fair bit of complexity.
