When adding new entries to `ProblematicCharRanges`, you have to be careful to not make any mistakes since that could cause glyph mapping issues.
Currently the existing reference tests should probably help catch any errors, but based on experience I think that having a unit-test which specifically checks `ProblematicCharRanges` would be both helpful and timesaving when modifying/reviewing changes to this code.
Hence this patch which adds a function (and unit-test) that is used to validate the entries in `ProblematicCharRanges`, and also checks that we don't accidentally add more character ranges than the Private Use Area can actually contain.
The way that the validation code, and thus the unit-test, is implemented also means that we have an easy way to tell how much of the Private Use Area is potentially utilized by re-mapped characters.
This is similar to the existing `isCmd` and `isDict` functions, which already support similar kind of checks.
With the updated `isName` function, we'll be able to simplify many callsites from: `isName(someVariable) && someVariable.name === 'someName'` to: `isName(someVariable, 'someName')`.
[api-minor] Add a parameter to `PDFPageProxy_getTextContent` that controls whether `PartialEvaluator_getTextContent` will attempt to combine same line text items
Note that I used a separate warning message for this case, instead of utilizing the same one as in the unsupported subtype case, to more clearly indicate that the PDF file itself is to blame rather than PDF.js.
Fixes 7446.
From the discussion in issue 7445, it seems that there may be cases where an API consumer would want to get the text content as is, without combined text items.
Fixes http://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/09/30/file2/file2.pdf.
Note how it's not possible to show the various Popup Annotations in the above document.
To fix that, this patch lets the Popup inherit the flags of the parent, in the special case where the parent is `viewable` *and* the Popup is not.
In general, I don't think that a Popup must have the same flags set as the parent. However, it seems very strange to have a `viewable` parent annotation, and then not being able to view the Popup.
Annoyingly the PDF specification doesn't, as far as I can find, mention anything about how this case should be handled, but this patch seem consistent with the actual behaviour in Adobe Reader.
Currently for explicit destinations, compared to named destinations, we manually try to build a hash that often times is a quite poor representation of the *actual* destination. (Currently this only, kind of, works for `\XYZ` destinations.)
For PDF files using explicit destinations, this can make it difficult/impossible to obtain a link to a specific section of the document through the URL.
Note that in practice most PDF files, especially newer ones, use named destinations and these are thus unnaffected by this patch.
This patch also fixes an existing issue in `PDFLinkService_getDestinationHash`, where a named destination consisting of only a number would not be handled correctly.
With the added, and already existing, type checks in place for destinations, I really don't think that this patch exposes any "sensitive" internal destination code not already accessible through normal hash parameters.
*Please note:* Just trying to improve the algorithm that generates the hash is unfortunately not possible in general, since there are a number of cases where it will simply never work well.
- First of all, note that `getDestinationHash` currently relies on the `_pagesRefCache`, hence it's possible that the hash returned is empty during e.g. ranged/streamed loading of a PDF file.
- Second of all, the currently computed hash is actually dependent on the document rotation. With named destinations, the fetched internal destination array is rotational invariant (as it should be), but this will not hold in general for the hash. We can easily avoid this issue by using a stringified destination array.
- Third of all, note that according to the PDF specification[1], `GoToR` destinations may actually contain explicit destination arrays. Since we cannot really construct a hash in `annotation.js`, we currently have no good way to support those. Even though this case seems *very* rare in practice (I've not actually seen such a PDF file), it's in the specification, and this patch allows us to support that for "free".
---
[1] http://www.adobe.com/content/dam/Adobe/en/devnet/acrobat/pdfs/PDF32000_2008.pdf#G11.1951685
Currently the `getPageIndex` method will happily return `0`, even if the `Ref` parameter doesn't actually point to a proper /Page dictionary.
Having the API trust that the consumer is doing the right thing seems error-prone, hence this patch which adds a check for this case.
Given that the `Catalog_getPageIndex` method isn't used in any hot part of the codebase, this extra check shouldn't be a problem.
(Note: in the standard viewer, it is only ever used from `PDFLinkService_navigateTo` if a destination needs to be resolved during document loading, which isn't common enough to be an issue IMHO.)
These have been found using `gulp lint` in combination with the `unused:
true` parameter for JSHint. Unfortunately there are too many false
positives to enable this feature, but now that most globals have been
removed because of the conversion to UMD the results are much more
useful than before.
In the font in question, there are a couple of `topDict` entries that have invalid values (`0xF 0xF`, i.e. just eof markers without any actual numbers).
This causes the `parseFloatOperand` function, inside `CFFParser_parseDict`, to return `NaN`. Currently we pass this broken font onto the browser, which OTS unsurprisingly rejects.
Fixes https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1068432.
Re: issue 7261.
Given the we have `gulp fonttest`, which tests the `fonts.js` functionality at a higher level, and that we have *a lot* of font specific reference tests, I'm not convinced that we *also* need unit-tests for it.
We currently don't have *any* unit-tests for `LinkAnnotation`s, so it seemed a good idea to add a few. These tests are taken from various actual PDF files.
This patch also adds/improves utility functions for checking if the passwords are correct/incorrect, and replaces `string2binary` with `stringToBytes`. Finally the patch does away with the `DictMock`, in favour of using actual `Dict`s.
Re: issue 6905.
Using `new {Name,Cmd}` should be avoided, since it creates a new object on *every* call, whereas `{Name,Cmd}.get` uses caches to only create *one* object regardless of how many times they are called.
Most of these are found in the unit-tests, where increased memory usage probably doesn't matter very much. But it still seems good to get rid of those cases, since no part of the codebase ought to advertise that usage.
Given the small size of the patch, I'm also tweaking a few comments and class names.
In the API unit-tests, we're currently loading the `basicapi.pdf` before every sub-test in `PDFDocument` and `Page`, which slows down the unit-tests quite a bit.
Locally this patch reduces the run time for `gulp unittest` by at least 40% for me.
This is required to be able to use it in the annotation display code,
where we now apply it to sanitize the filename of the FileAttachment
annotation. The PDF file from https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1230933 has shown that some PDF generators include the path of the file rather than the filename, which causes filenames with weird initial characters. PDF viewers handle this differently (for example Foxit Reader just replaces forward slashes with spaces), but we think it's better to only show the filename as intended.
Additionally we add unit tests for the `getFilenameFromUrl` helper
function.
Currently the `C` entry in an outline item is returned as is, which is neither particularly useful nor what the API documentation claims.
This patch also adds unit-tests for both the color handling, and the `F` entry (bold/italic flags).
