Starting a new path will wipe out any of the current subpaths in the
current graphics state, so we should reset the min/maxes.
This makes a number of the bounding boxes smaller and reduces the number
of composed pixels. For the smask tests in the corpus, the number of
composed pixesl goes from 19,872,109 to 19,676,905. The difference is much
larger on other PDFs though.
*Sometimes I'll hopefully learn to optimize my code directly when writing it, rather than having to do multiple clean-up passes; sorry about the churn here!*
For most page layouts there won't be any "holes" in the visible pages (or thumbnails), and in those cases it'd obviously be preferable not having to repeat any checks of already rendered pages.
Rather than only checking the "distance" between the first/last pages, we can instead compare the theoretical number of pages (between first/last) with the actually visible number of pages instead. This way, we're able to better detect the "holes"-case and can skip unnecessary parsing in the common case.
I missed this one spot in PR 12870, when converting the other cases in the "keydown" event handler. However, given that it only matters in PresentationMode and/or when "page-fit" zooming is enabled, this oversight shouldn't have had any user-observable impact (but we should fix it nonetheless).
This is a follow-up to PR 10675, since there I completely overlooked that we also need to handle the case where a PDF document has *failed* to load when the "supportsRangedLoading" message is sent to the viewer.
It seems that issue 10301 was fixed by PR 13424, by combining the spans, however given that we don't have a lot of test coverage for RTL-text I figured that adding a simple reference test wouldn't hurt (rather than just closing the issue as WORKSFORME).
There were some links not working in some XFA files,I realized that the anchor tag that contains the link has an inline display and couldn't receive any height, solved this by adding a "position: absolute". Tested with two different files in Firefox Nightly and Chrome and now all links are working perfectly fine. Added reftest to avoid future regressions
Embedded JS in PDF keep throwing alert reagdring specific version of Acrobat (Spanish and version 5.0 or greater).
This happens because:
- JS in pdf is enabled
- PDF contains some unsupported features (e.g. XFA)
Alert come when app.formVersion = undefined || app.formVersion < 5.0
In pdf.js we were using FORM_VERSION = undefined. After researching based on https://opensource.adobe.com/dc-acrobat-sdk-docs/acrobatsdk/pdfs/acrobatsdk_jsapiref.pdf\#G4.1993509 and Acrobat DC we decided to go with the larger number to avoid unnecessary popups.
Through investigation we realise that VIEWER_VERSION should have same value - a number.
Due to all that, we implemented 21.00720099 as a value for both FORMS_VERSION and VIEWER_VERSION
The only reason for using a `DocumentFragment` in the first place, originally added in PR 8724, was to prevent errors in the `PDFPageView`-constructor. However, we should be able to simply make its `container`-option *optional* instead, since it's not being used for anything else in the class.
Note that pre-rendering still works correctly in my testing, and given that the `BaseViewer` keeps references to all `PDFPageView`-instances (via its `_pages` Array) it also shouldn't be possible to "lose" any pages/canvases this way.
Unfortunately there exist PDF documents where all pageLabels are empty strings, see e.g. http://www.cs.cornell.edu/~ragarwal/pubs/blk-switch.pdf (taken from an old issue), which result in the pageNumber-input being completely blank. That doesn't seem very helpful, and this patch simply extends the approach used to ignore pageLabels that are identical to standard page numbering.
In the GENERIC viewer, e.g. when dragging-and-dropping a new PDF document which automatically opens the outline, there can now be breaking errors in the `{BaseViewer, PDFThumbnailViewer}.#getScrollAhead` methods since there's no visible pages/thumbs during loading; sorry about the breakage!
This was a stupid oversight on my part, since the first/last visible pages have obviously already been rendered at the point when we're checking for any potential "holes" in the page layout.
While this will obviously not have any measurable effect on performance, we should nonetheless avoid doing completely unnecessary checks here.
This is a very old "issue", which has existed since essentially forever, and it affects all of the available scrollModes. However, in the recently added Page-mode it's particularily noticeable since we use a *simulated* scroll direction there.
When deciding what page(s) to pre-render, we only consider the current scroll direction. This works well in most cases, but can break down at the start/end of the document by trying to pre-render a page *outside* of the existing ones. To improve this, we'll thus *force* the scroll direction at the start/end of the document.
*Steps to reproduce:*
0. Open the viewer, e.g. https://mozilla.github.io/pdf.js/web/viewer.html
1. Enable vertical scrolling.
2. Press the <kbd>End</kbd> key.
3. Open the devtools and, using the DOM Inspector, notice how page 13 is *not* being pre-rendered.
This allows us to compose much smaller regions of soft
mask making them much faster. This should also allow
for further optimizations in the pattern code.
For example locally I see issue #6573 go from 55s
to 5s with this change.
Fixes#6573
The old method of handling soft masks had a number of issues where the temporary
drawing canvas and the suspended main canvas could get out of sync
(e.g. mismatched save/restores or clip state) or we could end up compositing at
the wrong time. A good example of things getting out sync is the reduced test
case in #9017.
To fix this I've changed two big things:
1) Duplicate all the needed graphics state from the temporary canvas to the
suspended main canvas. This ensure the canvases stay in sync so that when we
switch back to the main canvas the graphics state stack is the same
(e.g. transforms, clip paths).
2) Immediately composite after each drawing operation. This ensures that if
there's an active clip region that we'll still be able to composite the correct
portions of the canvas. Note: This solution could be avoided by using
getImageData and putImageData since those ignore clipping region, but this is
very very slow. Note2: I also think the old way of only compositing at the end
of the soft mask is incorrect and can lead to wrong colors if drawing over the
same region, but in practice this doesn't seem to matter much.
Fixes: #5781Fixes: #5853Fixes: #7267Fixes: #7891Fixes: #8403Fixes: #8624Fixes: #12798Fixes: #13891Fixes: #9017 (reduced test case)
Fixes: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1703683
With ESLint 8 we should now finally be able to start using modern `class` features, see https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Classes/Public_class_fields and https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Classes/Private_class_fields
However, while both ESLint and Acorn now support this, it unfortunately turns out that Escodegen (which we use during building) still lack the necessary support. Looking at https://github.com/estools/escodegen there's not been any updates since last year, and there's also open PRs adding support for these new `class` features.
To avoid blocking usage of these `class` features in the PDF.js code-base, in particular *private* fields/methods, this patch thus proposes that we (hopefully temporarily) switch to an `escodegen` fork that has the necessary support; please see https://www.npmjs.com/package/@javascript-obfuscator/escodegen
While I have no reason to doubt the security of the `escodegen` fork, this patch nonetheless pins the version number. Furthermore, I've also diffed the output of the two `.js`-files in this forked package against the original files without finding anything that looks immediately "dangerous".
