pdf.js

Author SHA1 Message Date

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Romain Petit	13b0ca6b2a	Don't detect nw.js as node.js nw.js is chrome plus nodejs. It will succeed everywhere chrome succeeds, but fail in many cases where nodejs succeeds (see issue 9071). So it's safer to consider it as a browser context rather than a nodejs context. Make travis happy again CS Readability + Explanation The relevant portion of the NW.js documentation: http://docs.nwjs.io/en/latest/For%20Users/Advanced/JavaScript%20Contexts%20in%20NW.js/#access-nodejs-and-nwjs-api-in-browser-context Added full link to relevant doc.	2018-11-07 11:14:22 +01:00
Jonas Jenwald	0e1b5589e7	Restore the `btoa`/`atob` polyfills for Node.js These were removed in PR 9170, since they were unused in the browsers that we'll support in PDF.js version `2.0`. However looking at the output of Travis, where a subset of the unit-tests are run using Node.js, there's warnings about `btoa` being undefined. This doesn't appear to cause any errors, which probably explains why we didn't notice this before (despite PR 9201).	2018-01-13 01:31:05 +01:00

Romain Petit

13b0ca6b2a

Don't detect nw.js as node.js

nw.js is chrome plus nodejs.
It will succeed everywhere chrome succeeds, but fail in many cases where nodejs succeeds (see issue 9071).
So it's safer to consider it as a browser context rather than a nodejs context.

Make travis happy again

CS

Readability + Explanation

The relevant portion of the NW.js documentation:
http://docs.nwjs.io/en/latest/For%20Users/Advanced/JavaScript%20Contexts%20in%20NW.js/#access-nodejs-and-nwjs-api-in-browser-context

Added full link to relevant doc.

2018-11-07 11:14:22 +01:00

Jonas Jenwald

0e1b5589e7

Restore the btoa/atob polyfills for Node.js

These were removed in PR 9170, since they were unused in the browsers that we'll support in PDF.js version `2.0`.
However looking at the output of Travis, where a subset of the unit-tests are run using Node.js, there's warnings about `btoa` being undefined. This doesn't appear to cause any errors, which probably explains why we didn't notice this before (despite PR 9201).

2018-01-13 01:31:05 +01:00

2 Commits