Note that this particular helper function is, with the exception of the `GENERIC` default viewer and the (unsupported) SVG-backend, mostly unused at this point in time. Hence we should be able to clean-up this helper function slightly.
Also, fixes a small inconsistency in the `SVGGraphics` initialization in the viewer, by passing in the `disableCreateObjectURL` compatibility-option. Given that the SVG-backend isn't officially supported/recommended this shouldn't have been an issue, but given that I spotted this it can't hurt to fix it.
For any viewer component not listed in `web/pdf_viewer.component.js`, it shouldn't be necessary to provide a default value for the `l10n`-parameters.
Note also that these *specific* components are heavily tailored towards the default viewer use-case, rather than for general usage.
Given that `PDFFindBar` is written *specifically* for the default viewer, rather than general usage (as opposed to the `PDFFindController`), we should be able to simply assume that the `findResultsCount` DOM-element is always present. Even more so, when we're purposely not doing any similar checks for other DOM-elements in this code.
Also, remove unnecessary `null` defaults for the various DOM-element options in the constructor, since the code simply assumes that all of the relevant DOM-elements are in fact available.
Note how the `PDFAttachmentViewer` handles PDF file attachments specially, by opening them in a new window/tab, rather than forcing them to be downloaded. This is done to improve the overall UX, since browsers in general are able to handle PDF files internally.
However, for file *annotations* we're currently not attempting to do the same thing and are instead just downloading them directly. In order to unify the behaviour, without having to duplicate a lot of code, the opening of PDF file attachments is thus moved into a new `DownloadManager.openOrDownloadData` method.
The only reason, as far as I can tell, for parsing the Metadata on the main-thread is how it was originally implemented. When Metadata support was first implemented, it utilized the [`DOMParser`](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/DOMParser) which isn't available in workers.
Today, with the custom XML-parser being used, that's no longer an issue and it seems reasonable to move the Metadata parsing to the worker-thread[1], since that's where all parsing should happen (for performance reasons).
Based on these changes, we'll be able to reduce the now unnecessary duplication of the XML-parser (and related code) in both of the *built* `pdf.js`/`pdf.worker.js` files.
Finally, this patch changes the `_repair` method to use "Array + join" rather than string concatenation.
---
[1] This needed the previous patch, to enable sending of `Map`s between threads with workers disabled.
I happened to look at this code, and I can't for the life of me figure out why I didn't just implement it like this patch in the first place (since the current format feels overly verbose).
*This is somewhat similar to PR 12931.*
For PDF documents where fonts are completely missing in the /Resources dictionaries, there's basically no "correct" way of rendering the document.
Hence it's very unlikely that another PDF viewer will do a better job than PDF.js in these cases, and consequently it seems highly questionable if the fallback bar really helps here.
Given that these event listeners should essentially never be needed, but are included simply to avoid breakage in edge-cases, it can't hurt to make this code slightly less verbose.
- Mark `BaseViewer.initializeScriptingEvents` as an `async` method, since that's actually how it's being used in the default viewer (see `PDFViewerApplication-_initializeJavaScript`).
- Change `BaseViewer._pageWidthScaleFactor` to access the *internal* scroll/spread-modes directly, rather than using the getters, since that's consistent with the rest of the code (and not just for these properties).
For reasons that I now can't for the life of me understand, I included handling of the `PresentationModeState.CHANGING`-case despite it not actually doing anything.
Given that these HTML elements are not being used at all in `MOZCENTRAL`-builds, note the preprocessor check in `PDFViewerApplication._otherError`, we obviously don't need the HTML code either.
Some of the localization strings (e.g. "loading_error") are repeated multiple times throughout the `web/app.js` file, which means that we need to duplicate the fallback strings as well. Furthermore, the signature of the `IL10n.get` method makes the call-sites quite verbose.
By adding a new helper method, in `PDFViewerApplication`, we're able to gather the localization fallback strings in one central spot in `web/app.js` and also make the lookup of the error/warning messages more compact.
This code is *very* old and it even predates the existence of arrow functions. Hence we can now reduce the overall verbosity by not having to explicitly spell out `PDFViewerApplication` everywhere.
This feature was Firefox-specific, and it's now been removed from the HTML specification and it's disabled by default starting with Firefox 85. Hence it seems completely unnecessary to keep this code in the default viewer.
Please refer to https://groups.google.com/g/mozilla.dev.platform/c/tc11BCenm2c and the resources that it links to.
Given that `getComputedStyle` only works on visible elements, the result of PR 12354 is that if the viewer is placed in a *hidden* `iframe` the viewer will now be broken. This obviously wasn't the intention of that PR, hence I believe that we should limit the `position: absolute;` check slightly to avoid this.
aria-controls state
In testing, screen readers such as JAWS have trouble understanding the expanded state of the buttons that expand hidden menus due to lacking aria-expanded attribute. Also, given that the buttons do not contain the controlled/shown element, they should also define the aria-controls attribute with associated element id per https://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria-1.1/#aria-expanded
This fixes adds these requirements for the sidebar, find, and secondary toolbar buttons.
Currently it's not *immediately* clear from the code itself, unless you look at the definition of `this._pageLabels`, that the default value is `null`.[1]
We can improve this, and also reduce the amount of code, by using modern ECMAScript features such as optional chaining and nullish coalescing.
---
[1] Keep in mind that an *empty* string is actually a valid page label, according to the PDF specification.
Given that we don't focus the viewer *itself* (among other things) when the viewer is embedded, I suppose that it makes some sense to not focus the `PasswordPrompt` input-field either on load.
In order to improve the overall UX here, if an *incorrect* password was provided we'll still focus the input-field.
Fixes 12951 (assuming we care to do so, of course).
With PR 10539, we'll now always attempt to fallback to the PDF.js built-in font renderer for fonts that fail to load (i.e. are rejected by the sanitizer). Generally speaking, these errors are the result of insufficient validation in the PDF.js font code, however in almost all cases we've seen thus far our built-in font renderer manages just fine.
However, we still trigger the `onUnsupportedFeature` reporting, which in Firefox causes the fallback bar to be displayed. Given that, in a majority of cases[1], things look fine it seems unfortunate to bother the user with the fallback bar here.
Note that even though we no longer show the fallback bar in this case, we still report telemetry as before.
---
[1] The only *known* case where things aren't fine with the built-in font renderer is issue 10232, however that document is sufficiently broken that there's a couple of other things that will trigger the fallback bar.
- For wrapped scrolling, we unfortunately need to do a fair bit of parsing of the *current* page layout. Compared to e.g. the spread-modes, where we can easily tell how the pages are laid out, with wrapped scrolling we cannot tell without actually checking. In particular documents with varying page sizes require some care, since we need to check all pages on the "row" of the current page are visible and that there aren't any "holes" present. Otherwise, in the general case, there's a risk that we'd skip over pages if we'd simply always advance to the previous/next "row" in wrapped scrolling.
- For horizontal scrolling, this patch simply maintains the current behaviour of advancing *one* page at a time. The reason for this is to prevent inconsistent behaviour for the next and previous cases, since those cannot be handled identically. For the next-case, it'd obviously be simple to advance to the first not completely visible page. However for the previous-case, we'd only be able to go back *one* page since it's not possible to (easily) determine the page layout of non-visible pages (documents with varying page sizes being a particular issue).
- For vertical scrolling, this patch maintains the current behaviour by default. When spread-modes are being used, we'll now attempt to advance to the next *spread*, rather than just the next page, whenever possible. To prevent skipping over a page, this two-page advance will only apply when both pages of the current spread are visible (to avoid breaking documents with varying page sizes) and when the second page in the current spread is fully visible *horizontally* (to handle larger zoom values).
In order to reduce the performance impact of these changes, note that the previous/next-functionality will only call `getVisibleElements` for the scroll/spread-modes where that's necessary and that "normal" vertical scrolling is thus unaffected by these changes.
To support these changes, the `getVisibleElements` helper function will now also include the `widthPercent` in addition to the existing `percent` property.
The `PDFViewer._updateHelper` method is changed slightly w.r.t. updating the `currentPageNumber` for the non-vertical/spread modes, i.e. won't affect "normal" vertical scrolling, since that helped simplify the overall calculation of the page advance.
Finally, these new `BaseViewer` methods also allow (some) simplification of previous/next-page functionality in various viewer components.
*Please note:* There's one thing that this patch does not attempt to change, namely disabling of the previous/next toolbarButtons respectively the firstPage/lastPage secondaryToolbarButtons. The reason for this is that doing so would add quite a bit of complexity in general, and if for some reason `BaseViewer._getPageAdvance` would get things wrong we could end up incorrectly disabling the buttons. Hence it seemed overall safer to *not* touch this, and accept that the buttons won't be `disabled` despite in some edge-cases no further scrolling being possible.
The whole purpose of showing a notification on the `sidebarToggle` button, when the sidebar is closed, was to give users *some* kind of indication that the PDF document contains outline/attachments/layers without having to manually open the sidebar to check.
However, in the implementation in PR 7959, I also added notifications for each view-buttons in the sidebar. Looking back at this, I've always questioned the value of the last part, since the view-buttons already have a `disabled`-state which shows if they're available or not. Hence we're actually, in a sense, duplicating notifications for the outline/attachments/layers-buttons without adding (in my opinion) all that much overall value.
All-in-all, I'm thus proposing that we only display the notification on the `sidebarToggle`-button itself, since that should really be sufficient here, which also allows us to simplify the relevant code a fair bit.
Note first of all how the `PDFDocumentProxy.getJSActions` method in the API caches the result, which makes repeated lookups cheap enough to not really be an issue.
Secondly, with the previous patch, we're now only dispatching "pageopen"/"pageclose"-events when there's actually a sandbox that listens for them.
All-in-all, with these changes we can thus simplify the default-viewer "pageopen"-event handler a fair bit.
This patch is a rebased *and* refactored version of PR 9448, such that it applies cleanly given that `PDFFindController` has changed since that PR was opened; obviously keeping the original author information intact.
This patch will thus ensure that e.g. fractions, and other things that we normalize before searching, will still be highlighted correctly in the textLayer.
Furthermore, this patch also adds basic unit-tests for this functionality.
*Note:* The `[api-minor]` tag is added, since third-party implementations of the `PDFFindController` must now always use the `pageMatchesLength` property to get accurate length information (see the `web/text_layer_builder.js` changes).
Co-authored-by: Ross Johnson <ross@mazira.com>
Co-authored-by: Jonas Jenwald <jonas.jenwald@gmail.com>
The "pageopen"/"pageclose"-events are only necessary if, and only if, there's actually a sandbox to dispatch the events in. Hence we shouldn't dispatch those events unconditionally, as soon as `enableScripting` is set, but rather initialize that functionality only when needed.
Furthermore, in `web/app.js`, there's currently a bug since we're attempting to *manually* simulate a "pageopen"-event for a page that may not actually have been rendered at the time. With the modified `BaseViewer.initializeScriptingEvents` method, we'll now dispatch a correct "pageopen"-event here.
Not only was long text in popups no longer wrapped correctly, the
alignment was also center instead of left (or right, depending on the
locale used) for both text in popups and the other parts within the
annotation's section, such as the icon.
Note that these changes were done automatically, using `gulp lint --fix`.
With this rule, we'll thus enforce a *consistent* formatting of zero-lengths in our CSS files.
Please find additional details about the Stylelint rule at https://stylelint.io/user-guide/rules/length-zero-no-unit
With the updated default viewer UI, some `dir`-dependent CSS rules are now redundant since *identical* rules are being specified for both LTR and RTL mode; after PR 12807 landed I've found even more of these cases.
Note in particular that the findbar-button rules can be simplified quite a bit, since there's a fair amount of unnecessary duplication in the CSS.
