I happened to notice that some inequalities had the wrong order, and was surprised since I thought that the `yoda` rule should have caught that.
However, reading http://eslint.org/docs/rules/yoda#options a bit more closely than previously, it's quite obvious that the `onlyEquality` option does *exactly* what its name suggests. Hence I think that it makes sense to adjust the options such that only ranges are allowed instead.
There's still some work necessary if we want to be able to run (even a subset of) the API unit-tests on Travis.
However, this patch could be considered a small first step, since the relevant unit-tests will now rely on a `CanvasFactory` rather than using `document.createElement('canvas')` directly.
This patch gets rid of the only case in the code-base where we're throwing a plain `string`, rather than an `Error`, which besides better/more consistent error handling also allows us to enable the [`no-throw-literal`](http://eslint.org/docs/rules/no-throw-literal) ESLint rule.
The point of this patch is to fix a couple of inconsistencies in `viewer.html`, compared to the locale files, such that the viewer would work correctly even without the `l10n/` files present.
*Note:* Since this isn't changing any of the locale files, we should *not* need to update any of the string names.
Looking through the history of the findbar code, it seems that the `findPrevious`/`findNext` buttons have never had a `title` set (note PR 2168, which was the initial findbar implementation).
Furthermore, the `placeholder` of the `findInput` didn't agree 100% with locale file either, so this is also adjusted.
I noticed that we have a `.toolbarButton.group` CSS class, which is currently applied to some buttons in the viewer. Since it attempts to adjust the `margin-right` property, I was initially a bit puzzled as to why there wasn't different rules for LTR/RTL locales.
However, checking the viewer with the DevTools inspector, in both LTR and RTL locales, I quickly found that the rule in question is *always* being overridden by other CSS rules.
It thus seem to me that while this rule was probably useful at some point, it has been dead for years and could now be removed.
The find functionality is currently not available for small devices
because the find dialog is not responsive. This patch fixes that.
To achieve this goal, the HTML is changed to always show the find
button. To prevent issues because of the addition of an extra button for
small views, the previous/next page buttons are hidden if the view
becomes small. These buttons are not useful anyway because on small
devices navigation is usually done via scrolling. The find functionality
is much more useful to have in this case. Moreover, we wrap the existing
elements into separate `div`s so that the browser can position the
elements itself when the view becomes smaller and logically connected
elements stay together when this happens.
In the CSS, extra rules for the find bar have been added to ensure that
the dialog's doorhanger is always below the find button. All findbar
`div`s are forced to be 32 pixels high to prevent the find message text
being aligned under the checkboxes. Finally, the find message is only
visible when there is actually text to display. This prevents wrapping
issues because, by default, the label has padding and margin even if
there is no text.
Instead of just upstreaming the changes from [bug 1345253](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1345253) as-is, it seemed better to simply get rid of the loops altogether and use the same approach as in `PDFViewer`/`PDFThumbnailViewer`.
This patch is another step towards enabling Babel. Since we're moving
towards ES6 modules, we will not be using UMD headers anymore, so we can
remove the validation.
First of all, `compatibility.js` is already available in `lib/shared/compatibility.js`. Second of all, as can be seen in 9142301f35 (diff-9432ebaa58e10ab02874fcb86f689caa), the `lib/web/compatibility.js` file cannot work since the `require` statement isn't compatible with the output of `gulp lib`.
*This is something that I noticed while working on PR 8126, which is (more) fallout from PR 6065.*
In general, it's actually *not* correct to return `Dict.empty` as the default value for non-existent properties. Please note that a prior PR, see https://github.com/mozilla/pdf.js/pull/5957#issuecomment-103112698, asked for that behaviour but I don't think that's right.
Obviously for properties that are (or should) be `Dict`s it makes sense, however certain properties can be e.g. Strings or Arrays instead. In the latter case, returning `Dict.empty` is just plain wrong, and it's quite fascinating that this hasn't caused any errors in practice. (The existing validation in the various getters has actually saved us here.)
Also, when looking at this code again, it seemed unnecessary to duplicate the `MAX_LOOP_COUNT` check since we could just return immediately instead.
When using content security headers to restrict connections to the same origin,
you may not make connections to `example.com`. This feature detection also
works with a request to the current location.
It appears that I accidentally broke this in PR 6065, sorry about that!
The issue in this particular PDF file is that there's `/Rotate` entries on different levels of the `/Pages` tree. We're supposed to use the `/Rotate` entry in the `/Page` dict (which is `0`), but because of an incorrect condition we instead ended up with the one from the `/Pages` dict (which is `180`).
Fixes 8125.
Given that the mailing list has now been closed, see [bug 1340296](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1340296), and that there's no weekly meetings any more, we probably shouldn't mention either of those in CONTRIBUTING.md.
Instead, let's just suggest the IRC channel as a means of communication here.
Ideally, the `Annotation` class should not have anything to do with the
page's operator list. How annotations are added to the page's operator
list is logic that belongs in `src/core/document.js` instead where the
operator list is constructed.
Moreover, some comments have been added to clarify the intent of the
code.
