Fixes http://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/09/30/file2/file2.pdf.
Note how it's not possible to show the various Popup Annotations in the above document.
To fix that, this patch lets the Popup inherit the flags of the parent, in the special case where the parent is `viewable` *and* the Popup is not.
In general, I don't think that a Popup must have the same flags set as the parent. However, it seems very strange to have a `viewable` parent annotation, and then not being able to view the Popup.
Annoyingly the PDF specification doesn't, as far as I can find, mention anything about how this case should be handled, but this patch seem consistent with the actual behaviour in Adobe Reader.
Use chrome.storage.sync to store preferences instead of
chrome.storage.local, to allow settings to be synchronized if the user
chooses to sign in in Chrome and enables synchronization of extension
preferences.
Commit df10513e10 unfortunately broke the options dialog of the Chromium extension because the logic required to work with the preference was not added. This patch adds the required logic to show the preference in the options dialog and to persist it to the preferences storage.
Verified using Chromium 50 on Arch Linux.
These have been found using `gulp lint` in combination with the `unused:
true` parameter for JSHint. Unfortunately there are too many false
positives to enable this feature, but now that most globals have been
removed because of the conversion to UMD the results are much more
useful than before.
This was only ever useful for the Opera extension because the API
requires a whitelisted extension ID. Opera ditched PDF.js from their
extension gallery, so we don't need to keep this in the tree.
I've seen the above error occasionally when the scale is updated many times in quick succession, but I've not been able to pinpoint exactly why it happens.
Since the error isn't caught, this means that the `pageViewDrawCallback` function doesn't run to completion.
Unfortunately, given the very intermittent nature of the issue, I haven't got any good STR for reliably reproducing this issue. However, I hope that this patch can be accepted anyway, since it's simple and should help prevent unnecessary errors.
In the font in question, there are a couple of `topDict` entries that have invalid values (`0xF 0xF`, i.e. just eof markers without any actual numbers).
This causes the `parseFloatOperand` function, inside `CFFParser_parseDict`, to return `NaN`. Currently we pass this broken font onto the browser, which OTS unsurprisingly rejects.
Fixes https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1068432.
As evident from e.g. PRs 6485 and 7118, some bad PDF generators unfortunately create Arrays where *some* elements are indirect objects (i.e. `Ref`s). This seems to mostly affect Arrays that contain numbers, such as e.g. `Matrix/FontMatrix/BBox/FontBBox/Rect/Color/...`, and has manifested itself in PDF files that fail to render correctly (some elements are missing).
The problem in both the cases above, besides broken rendering, was that there were *no* errors/warnings that indicated what the problem was, making it difficult to pinpoint the issue.
Hence this patch, where I've audited all usages of `Dict_get` in `src/core/` files, and replaced it with `Dict_getArray` where appropriate to try and prevent unnecessary future bugs.
Re: issue 7261.
Given the we have `gulp fonttest`, which tests the `fonts.js` functionality at a higher level, and that we have *a lot* of font specific reference tests, I'm not convinced that we *also* need unit-tests for it.
