Rather than trying to be "clever" here, and possibly affect code readability negatively, let's just restore the `collectFields` parameter to address the unneeded parsing that now happens when printing new Annotations.
In the rare situation that an optional content dictionary lacks a /Type-entry we currently throw, which may prevent e.g. Form XObjects from rendering completely.
Fixes https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707147
When there is no tree, the tags for the new annotions are just put under the root element.
When there is a tree, we insert the new tags at the right place in using the value
of structTreeParentId (added in PR #16916).
Now that modern JavaScript is fully supported also in the worker-thread we no longer need to keep old closures, which slightly reduces the size of the code.
Given that this is a shadowed getter, the `opMap` is already lazily initialized and it shouldn't be necessary to *also* use the `getLookupTableFactory` helper function here. Looking at the history of the code, it seems that this is simply a leftover from before JavaScript classes existed.
Now that modern JavaScript is fully supported also in the worker-thread we no longer need to keep old closures, which slightly reduces the size of the code.
Now that modern JavaScript is fully supported also in the worker-thread we no longer need to keep old closures, which slightly reduces the size of the code.
Now that modern JavaScript is fully supported also in the worker-thread we no longer need to keep old closures, which slightly reduces the size of the code.
Now that modern JavaScript is fully supported also in the worker-thread we no longer need to keep old closures, which slightly reduces the size of the code.
While this cache will not contain a huge amount of data in practice, it's nonetheless a *global* cache that currently will never be cleared.
This patch also removes the existing closure, since it shouldn't really be necessary nowadays given that the code is a JavaScript module which means that only explicitly listed properties will be exported.
When I started looking at PR 16938 it occurred to me that some of the new structTree-methods are synchronously accessing certain dictionary-data (not used during "normal" structTree-parsing), which may not be generally safe since everything in a dictionary could be a reference (and the relevant data may not have been loaded yet).
Rather than suggesting that we make all those new methods even more asynchronous, to me the overall simplest and safest solution is to ensure that the *entire* PDF document has been loaded *before* we begin saving it. In practice this shouldn't really affect "performance" of saving noticeably, since it's always depended on the entire PDF document being downloaded.
Finally note that with the exception of the PDF document possibly not having been fully downloaded when saving is triggered, all other "global" document properties are pretty much guaranteed to already be available at this point.
While it makes sense to check that the `destDict` parameter is indeed a Dictionary, since that data comes from the PDF document itself, the `resultObj` parameter is an internal PDF.js implementation detail that should always be correct (or tests will fail).
Over time the amount of "document level" data potentially needed during parsing of Annotations have increased a fair bit, which means that we currently need to ensure that a bunch of data is available for each individual Annotation.
Given that this data is "constant" for a PDF document we can instead create (and cache) it lazily, only when needed, *before* starting to parse the Annotations on a page. This way the parsing of individual Annotations should become slightly less asynchronous, which really cannot hurt.
An additional benefit of these changes is that we can reduce the number of parameters that need to be explicitly passed around in the annotation-code, which helps overall readability in my opinion.
One potential drawback of these changes is that the `AnnotationFactory.create` method no longer handles "everything" on its own, however given how few call-sites there are I don't think that's too much of a problem.
The classes were stripped out during when creating the field name but
it led to a wrong name.
Since class components in a path are irrelevant, they're just ignored
when searching for a node in the datasets.
The issue described in the mentioned bug is reall because
Acrobat is rendering the XFA instead of the Acroform.
The original patch just tried to workaround the issue but it
induces some regressions.
This was added in PR 14899, over a year ago, however it's still completely unused in the PDF.js library/viewer. In hindsight I think that it was a mistake to add unused functionality, and the issue should probably have been WONTFIXed instead, however we probably can't just remove it now.
Thanks to the pre-processor, we can at least exclude this code in the *built-in* Firefox PDF Viewer.
Given that the FieldObjects are parsed in parallel, in combination with the existing caching in the `getPage`-method and `annotations`-getter, adding additional caches for this fallback code-path doesn't seem entirely necessary.
This method is very old, however with the exception of the auto-print hack (when scripting is disabled) in the viewer it's never actually been used.
Most likely the idea with `PDFDocumentProxy.getJavaScript` was that it'd be useful if scripting support was added, however it turned out that it was a bit too simplistic and instead a number of new methods were added for the scripting use-cases.
When searching for "endobj"-operators, make sure that we don't accidentally match a "trailer"-string in /Content-streams without /Filter-entries (i.e. streams that contain "raw" and thus human-readable data).
When the flag is set, the appearance has to be generated from the value so it's
useless/meaningless to extract the content from the existing appearance.
When a pdf has /NeedAppearances set to true, the annotation appearance must be
generated from its value and we must take into account the hasOwnCanvas property.
*Please note:* I'm not aware of any bugs caused by this, however that might be more luck than anything else.
In PR 16392 the `incrementalUpdate` function, and all of its various helpers, were made asynchronous. However the call-site in `src/core/worker.js` wasn't updated, which means that we currently reset temporary XRef-entries while saving is ongoing.
With the changes in the previous patch the `isNodeJS`-helper no longer needs to live in its own file, which helps get rid of a closure in the *built* files.
