Similar to other markers that we currently skip, by ignoring unsupported Coding style default (COD) options we'll at least render *something* here (although some JPEG 2000 images may look slightly wrong).
Note that if the unsupported COD options lead to additional errors, during parsing, we'll still abort parsing of the JPEG 2000 image.
This will, in a very simple way using the existing events, thus allow the viewer to remove the "beforeunload" `window` event listener when the document is closed.
Generally speaking we want to avoid having *global* event listeners for the PDF document instance, which is why the `EventBus` exists, and instead reserve global events for the viewer itself. However, the `AnnotationStorage` "beforeunload" event unfortunately needs to be document-specific and we should thus ensure that it's correctly removed when the document is destroyed.
There's no really compelling reason, as far as I can tell, to introduce the `ENABLE_SCRIPTING` build-target, instead of simply re-using the existing `TESTING` build-target for the new `gulp integrationtest` task.
In general there should be no problem with just always enable scripting in TESTING-builds, and if I were to *guess* the reason that this didn't seem to work was most likely because the Preferences ended up over-writing the `AppOptions`.
As it turns out the GENERIC-viewer has already has built-in support for disabling of Preferences, via the `AppOptions`, and this can be utilized in TESTING-builds as well to ensure that whatever `AppOptions` are set they're always respected.
For DOM events all event names are lower-case, and the newly added PDF.js scripting-events thus "stick out" quite a bit. Even more so, considering that our internal `eventBus`-events follow the same naming convention.
Hence this patch, which changes the "updateFromSandbox"/"dispatchEventInSandbox" events to be lower-case instead.
Furthermore, using DOM events for communication *within* the PDF.js code itself (i.e. between code in `web/app.js` and `src/display/annotation_layer.js/`) feels *really* out of place.
That's exactly the reason that we have the `EventBus` abstraction, since it allowed us to remove prior use of DOM events, and this patch thus re-factors the code to make use of the `EventBus` instead for scripting-related events.
Obviously for events targeting a *specific element* using DOM events is still fine, but the "updatefromsandbox"/"dispatcheventinsandbox" ones should be using the `EventBus` internally.
*Drive-by change:* Use the `BaseViewer.currentScaleValue` setter unconditionally in `PDFViewerApplication._initializeJavaScript`, since it accepts either a string or a number.
- Update the `LinkAnnotationElement._bindJSAction` call-site to actually agree with the JSDocs, by passing in the `data`.
- Prevent the links created by `LinkAnnotationElement._bindJSAction` from being displayed with empty hashes; compare with e.g. `LinkAnnotationElement. _bindNamedAction`.
- The overall indentation-level in `WidgetAnnotationElement._setEventListener` can be reduced slightly by using early returns, which improves the overall readability of this method a bit. (We're also able to avoid unnecessary `in` usage here.)
- The code can also be made *slightly* more efficient overall, by moving the `this.data.actions` check into `WidgetAnnotationElement._setEventListeners` instead. This way we can avoid useless `this._setEventListener`-calls when there are no actions present.
- Actually remove the `isDown` property when destroying the scripting-instance.
- Mark all `mouseState` usage as "private" in the various classes.
- Ensure that the `AnnotationLayer` actually treats the parameter as properly *optional*, the same way that the viewer components do.
- For now remove the `mouseState` parameter from the `PDFPageView` class, and keep it only on the `BaseViewer`, since it's questionable if all of the scripting-functionality will work all that well without e.g. a full `BaseViewer`.
- Append the `mouseState` to the JSDoc for the `AnnotationElement` class, and just move its definition into the base-`AnnotationElement` class.
* the goal is to execute actions like Open or OpenAction
* can be tested with issue6106.pdf (auto-print)
* once #12701 is merged, we can add page actions
Similar to other markers that we currently skip, by ignoring the Coding style component (COC) marker we'll at least prevent outright errors (although some JPEG 2000 images may look slightly wrong).
* move set/clear|Timeout/Interval and crackURL code in pdf.js
* remove the "backdoor" in the proxy (used to dispatch event) and so return the dispatch function in the initializer
* remove listeners if an error occured during sandbox initialization
* add support for alert and prompt in the sandbox
* add a function to eval in the global scope
There doesn't seem to be anything definitive about this in
the spec, but from experimenting, it seems acrobat lets
PDFs override the widths of the standard fonts.
I completely missed this previously, but we obviously should remove the scriptElement as well to *really* clean-up everything properly.
Given that there's multiple existing usages of `loadScript` in the code-base, the safest/quickest solution seemed to be to have call-sites opt-in to remove the scriptElement using a new parameter.
This simplifies not just this code, but the unit-tests as well, and should be sufficient as far as I can tell.
Note also that currently, in the *built* `pdf.sandbox.js` file, there's even a line reading `testMode = testMode && false;` because of an accidentally flipped pre-processor statement.
Finally, in the `scripting_spec.js` unit-test, defines `sandboxBundleSrc` at the top of the file to make it easier to find and/or change it when necessary.
Each quadrilateral needs to have its own link element, so the first
quadrilateral can use the already created element, but the next
quadrilaterals need to clone that element.
Not only does this reduce boilerplate since the documentation is the
same for all annotation classes, it also wasn't correct for the
annotation types that support quadpoints since they return an array of
section elements instead of a single one.
There's no good reason, as far as I can tell, to use search-and-replace to include the *stringified* `pdf.scripting.js` file in the built `pdf.sandbox.js` file. Instead we could, and even should, utilize the existing `PDFJSDev.eval(...)`-functionality, which is not only simpler but will also be more efficient as well (no need for a regular expression).
The current location feels somewhat strange, and also inconsistent with the existing way that bundling is done.
Finally, add the version/build numbers at the top of the *built* `pdf.sandbox.js` files, since all other built files include that information given that it's often helpful to be able to easily determine the *exact* version.
*This is a recent regression, which I stumbled upon while working on cleaning-up the gulpfile related to `pdf.sandbox.js` building.*
By placing the `ColorConverters` functionality in the `src/display/display_utils.js` file, you end up including a *significant* chunk of the `pdf.js` file in the built `pdf.scripting.js`/`pdf.sandbox.js` files.
Given that I cannot imagine that this was actually intended, since it inflates the built files with unnecessary/unused code, this moves `ColorConverters` to a new file instead (thus breaking the dependencies).
To hopefully reduce the risk future bugs, along these lines, a big comment is also placed at the top of the new file.
Finally, the `ColorConverters` is converted to a class with static methods, since this felt slightly cleaner overall.
