This further extends the web-specific import maps introduced in PR 16009, to allow removing *most* of the build-time `require` statements from the viewer. The few remaining ones are fallbacks used for the COMPONENTS respectively the `legacy` GENERIC builds.
Given that the GV-viewer isn't using most of the UI-related components of the default-viewer, we can avoid including them in the *built* viewer to save space.[1]
The least "invasive" way of implementing this, at least that I could come up with, is to leverage import maps with suitable stubs for the GV-viewer.
The one slightly annoying thing is that we now have larger import maps across multiple html-files, and you'll need to remember to update all of them when making future changes.
---
[1] With this patch, the built `viewer.js` size is 391 kB and `viewer-geckoview.js` is 285 kB.
Rather than including all of this external code in the PDF.js repository, we should be using the npm package instead.
Unfortunately this is slightly more complicated than you'd hope, since the `fit-curve` package (which is older) isn't directly compatible with modern JavaScript modules.
In particular, the following cases needed to be considered:
- For the development viewer (i.e. `gulp server`) and the unit-tests, we thus need to build a fitCurve-bundle that can be directly `import`ed.
- For the actual PDF.js build-targets, we can slightly reduce the sizes by depending on the "raw" `fit-curve` source-code.
- For the Node.js unit-tests, the `fit-curve` package can be used as-is.
When adding new entries to `ProblematicCharRanges`, you have to be careful to not make any mistakes since that could cause glyph mapping issues.
Currently the existing reference tests should probably help catch any errors, but based on experience I think that having a unit-test which specifically checks `ProblematicCharRanges` would be both helpful and timesaving when modifying/reviewing changes to this code.
Hence this patch which adds a function (and unit-test) that is used to validate the entries in `ProblematicCharRanges`, and also checks that we don't accidentally add more character ranges than the Private Use Area can actually contain.
The way that the validation code, and thus the unit-test, is implemented also means that we have an easy way to tell how much of the Private Use Area is potentially utilized by re-mapped characters.
Re: issue 7261.
Given the we have `gulp fonttest`, which tests the `fonts.js` functionality at a higher level, and that we have *a lot* of font specific reference tests, I'm not convinced that we *also* need unit-tests for it.
This patch adds:
- Unit tests for the annotation border style class
- Regression test (self-made) for the annotation border style class
- Documentation generation using JSDoc
"text/javascript" is not a correct MIME type (the correct one is
"application/javascript") but it's not even needed; all browsers default
to the correct type and treat it as executable JS when type is ommited.
Since not all browsers recognize the "application/javascript" MIME type
the only way to both stay compliant and to support all popular browsers
is to omit the type. It's also shorter this way.
To run the unit test open pdf.js/test/unit/unit_test.html in your browser.
This requires that https://github.com/pivotal/jasmine is cloned to the same
directory level as pdf.js.
