With version 2.0, native support for typed arrays is now a requirement for using the PDF.js library; see PR 9094 where the old polyfills were removed.
Hence the `isTypedArraysPresent` check, when setting up fake workers, no longer serves any purpose here and can thus be removed.
There's no good reason, as far as I can tell, to duplicate the functionality of the `LoopbackPort` in the unit-tests. The only difference between the implementations is that `LoopbackPort` mimics the (native) structured cloning, however that shouldn't matter here since the tests are only sending "simple" data (strings respectively arrays with numbers).
Furthermore the patch also changes `LoopbackPort` to default to using "structured cloning" and deferred invocation of the listeners, since native typed array support is now a requirement for using the PDF.js library.
The `MessageHandler` itself, and its assorted helper functions, are currently the single largest[1] piece of code in the `src/shared/util.js` file. By moving this code into its own file, `src/shared/util.js` thus becomes smaller and more manageable.
The `fontScale` property was added in PR 1531, see commit b312719d7e in particular, apparently for the sole purpose of supporting the "acroforms" example.
However, the `fontScale` property was never used anywhere else in the code-base, and after the modernization of the "acroforms" example in PR 8030 it's been completely unused.
Finally, note that there's also a (more suitably named) `scale` property on `PageViewport` instances, which contains the exact same information as the property being removed here.
I made some mistakes when trying to make the content_disposition.js
compatible with non-modern browsers (IE/Edge).
Notably, text decoding was usually skipped because of the inverted
logical check at the top of `textdecode`.
I verified that this new version works as expected, as follows:
1. Visit 55c71eb44e/test/
and get test-content-disposition.js
also get test-content-disposition.node.js if using Node.js,
or get test-content-disposition.html if you use a browser.
2. Modify `test-content-disposition.node.js` (or the HTML file) and
change `../extension/content-disposition.js` to `PDFJS-content_disposition.js`
3. Copy the `getFilenameFromContentDispositionHeader` function from
`content_disposition.js` (i.e. the file without the trailing exports)
and save it as `PDFJS-content_disposition.js`.
4. Run the tests (`node test-content-disposition.node.js` or by opening
`test-content-disposition.html` in a browser).
5. Confirm that there are no failures: "Finished all tests (0 failures)"
The code has a best-efforts fallback for Microsoft Edge, which lacks the
TextDecoder API. The fallback only supports the common UTF-8 encoding.
To simulate this in a test, modify `PDFJS-content_disposition.js` and
deliberately throw an error before `new TextDecoder`. There will be two
failures because we don't want to include too much code to support text
decoding for non-UTF-8 encodings in Edge
```
test-content-disposition.js:265 Assertion failed: Input: attachment; filename*=ISO-8859-1''%c3%a4
Expected: "ä"
Actual : "ä"
test-content-disposition.js:268 Assertion failed: Input: attachment; filename*=ISO-8859-1''%e2%82%ac
Expected: "€"
Actual : "€"
```
Please note that while the current code works, both in the viewer and the unit-tests, it can leave the `WorkerTransport._passwordCapability` Promise in a pending state.
In the `PasswordRequest` handler, in src/display/api.js, we're returning the Promise from a `capability` object (rather than just a "plain" Promise). While an error thrown anywhere within this handler was fortunately enough to propagate it to the Worker side, it won't cause the Promise (in `WorkerTransport._passwordCapability`) to actually be rejected.
Finally note that while we're now catching errors in the `PasswordRequest` handler, those errors are still propagated to the Worker side via the (now) rejected Promise and the existing `return this._passwordCapability.promise;` line.
This prevents warnings about uncaught Promises, with messages such as "Error: Worker was destroyed during onPassword callback", when running the unit-tests both in browsers *and* in Node.js/Travis.
This should provide a better out-of-the-box experience when using PDF.js in a Node.js environment, since it's missing native support for both `@font-face` and `Image`.
Please note that this change *only* affects the default values, hence it's still possible for an API consumer to override those values when calling `getDocument`.
Also, prevents "ReferenceError: document is not defined" errors, when running the unit-tests in Node.js/Travis.
*This is a final piece of clean-up of code that I recently wrote, after which I'm done :-)*
When the `getMainThreadWorkerMessageHandler` function was added, in PR 9385, it did so by basically introducing a `web/app.js` dependency in `src/display/api.js` through the `window.pdfjsNonProductionPdfWorker` property[1]. Even though this is limited to non-`PRODUCTION` mode, i.e. `gulp server`, it still seems unfortunate to have that sort of viewer dependency in the API code itself.
With the new, much nicer and shorter, names introduced in PR 9565 we can remove this non-`PRODUCTION` hack and just use `window.pdfjsWorker` in both the viewer and the API regardless of the build mode.
---
[1] It didn't seem correct to piggy-back on the `window.pdfjsDistBuildPdfWorker` property in non-`PRODUCTION` mode.
The `getPageSizeInches` method was implemented on `PDFDocumentProxy`, which seems conceptually wrong since the size property isn't global to the document but rather specific to each page. Hence the method is moved into `PDFPageProxy`, as `get pageSizeInches` instead to address this.
Despite the fact that new API functionality was implemented, no unit-tests were added. To prevent issues later on, we should *always* ensure that new functionality has at least some test-coverage; something that this patch also takes care of.
The new `PDFDocumentProperties._parsePageSize` method seemed unnecessary convoluted. Furthermore, in the "no data provided"-case it even returned incorrect data (an array, rather than the expected object).
Finally, the fallback strings didn't actually agree with the `en-US` locale. This inconsistency doesn't look too great, and it's thus addressed here as well.
With options being moved from the global `PDFJS` object and into `getDocument`, a side-effect is that we're now passing in a fair number of useless parameters to the various transport/network streams.
Even though this doesn't *currently* cause any problems, it nonetheless seem like a good idea to explicitly provide the parameters that are actually necessary.
One additional complication with removing this option from the global `PDFJS` object, is that the viewer currently needs to check `disableAutoFetch` in a couple of places. To address this I'm thus proposing adding a getter in `PDFDocumentProxy`, to allow checking the *actually* used values for a particular `getDocument` invocation.
Unfortunately, as far as I can tell, we still need the ability to adjust certain API options depending on the browser environment in PDF.js version `2.0`. However, we should be able to separate this from the general compatibility code in the `src/shared/compatibility.js` file.
Compared to most other options currently/previously residing on the global `PDFJS` object, some of the Worker specific ones (e.g. `workerPort`/`workerSrc`) probably cannot be moved into options provided directly when initializing e.g. `PDFWorker`.
The reason is that in some cases, e.g. the Webpack examples, we try to provide Worker auto-configuration and I cannot see a good solution for that use-case if we completely remove the globally available Worker configuration.
However inline with previous patches for PDF.js version `2.0`, it does seem like a worthwhile goal to move away from storing options directly on the global `PDFJS` object, since that is a pattern we should avoid going forward. Especially since one of the (eventual) goals is to attempt to *completely* remove the global `PDFJS` object, and rely solely on exporting/importing the needed functionality.
By introducing the `GlobalWorkerOptions` we thus have larger flexibility in the future, if/when the global `PDFJS` object will be removed.
In order to simplify things, the undocumented `enableStats` option was removed and `pdfBug` is now instead used to enabled general debugging *and* page request/rendering stats.
Considering that in the default viewer the `stats` was only used when debugging was also enabled, this simplification (code wise) definitely seem worthwhile to me.
This removes the `PDFJS.externalLinkTarget`/`PDFJS.externalLinkRel` dependency from the viewer components, but please note that as a *temporary* solution the default viewer still uses it.
This removes the `PDFJS.imageResourcesPath` dependency from the viewer components and the test-suite, but please note that as a *temporary* solution the default viewer still uses it.
Fallback to the built-in JPEG decoder when browser decoding fails, and attempt to handle JPEG images with DNL (Define Number of Lines) markers (issue 8614)
First of all, note how in both `fetch_stream.js` and `node_stream.js` we always overwrite the `this._contentLength` property even when the response headers doesn't actually contain any (valid) length information. This could thus result in the `length` parameter, as passed to the network stream, being completely ignored despite having no better information available.
Secondly, in `node_stream.js` the `this._isRangeSupported` property wasn't always updated correctly based on the response headers.
This works by making `PartialEvaluator.buildPaintImageXObject` wait for the success/failure of `loadJpegStream` on the API side *before* parsing continues.
Please note that in practice, it should be quite rare for the browser to fail loading/decoding of a JPEG image. In the general case, it should thus not be completely surprising if even `src/core/jpg.js` will fail to decode the image.
Since `loadJpegStream` is only used at a *single* spot in the code-base, and given that it's very heavily tailored to the calling code (since it relies on the data structure of `PDFObjects`), this patch simply inlines the code in `src/display/api.js` instead.
Despite this patch removing the `disableWorker` option itself, please note that we'll still fallback to loading the worker file(s) on the main-thread when running in environments without proper Web Worker support.
Furthermore it's still possible, even with this patch, to force the use of fake workers by manually loading the necessary file using a `<script>` tag on the main-thread.[1]
That way, the functionality of the now removed `SINGLE_FILE` build target and the resulting `build/pdf.combined.js` file can still be achieved simply by adding e.g. `<script src="build/pdf.worker.js"></script>` to the HTML (obviously with the path adjusted as needed).
Finally note that the `disableWorker` option is a performance footgun, and unfortunately many existing third-party examples actually use it without providing any sort of warning/justification.
---
[1] This approach is used in the default viewer, since certain kind of debugging may be easier if the code is running directly on the main-thread.
This method returns the currently used `workerSrc`, which thus allows obtaining the fallback `workerSrc` value (e.g. when the option wasn't set by the user).
Please note that this build target, and the resulting `build/pdf.combined.js` file, is equivalent to setting the `PDFJS.disableWorker` option to `true` which is a performance footgun.
It turns out that PR 9245 unfortunately broke benchmarking completely, sorry about that!
The bug is that we were attempting to reset the current instance of `StatTimer`, instead of creating a new one as was previously done. By resetting the current instance, the `StatTimer` data fetched in `test/driver.js` is now wiped out since it points to the *same* underlying object.
This re-use of a `StatTimer` instance was asked for during review, and unfortunately I didn't test this thoroughly enough before submitting the final version of the PR.[1]
---
[1] Note that while I did test the benchmarking scripts with that PR *before* initially submitting it, I did however forget to do that after addressing the review comments which might explain why this problem went unnoticed.
This patch updates the `IPDFStreamReader` interface and ensures that the interface/implementation of `network.js`, `fetch_stream.js`, `node_stream.js`, and `transport_stream.js` all match properly.
The unit-tests are also adjusted, to more closely replicate the actual behaviour of the various actual `IPDFStreamReader` implementations.
Finally, this patch adjusts the use of the Content-Disposition filename when setting the title in the viewer, and adds `PDFDocumentProperties` support as well.
The `fetch` API is only supported for http(s), even in Chrome extensions.
Because of this limitation, we should use the XMLHttpRequest API when the
requested URL is not a http(s) URL.
Fixes#9361
These were removed in PR 9170, since they were unused in the browsers that we'll support in PDF.js version `2.0`.
However looking at the output of Travis, where a subset of the unit-tests are run using Node.js, there's warnings about `btoa` being undefined. This doesn't appear to cause any errors, which probably explains why we didn't notice this before (despite PR 9201).
Since multiple empty lines is virtually unused in the code-base, and the few cases that do exist look like "typos", let's enforce greater consistency here; please see https://eslint.org/docs/rules/no-multiple-empty-lines.
It is only used in a few places to handle prefixing style properties if
necessary. However, we used it only for `transform`, `transformOrigin`
and `borderRadius`, which according to Can I Use are supported natively
(unprefixed) in the browsers that PDF.js 2.0 supports. Therefore, we can
remove this class, which should help performance too since this avoids
extra function calls in parts of the code that are called often.
This was an oversight in PR 9095, which unfortunately breaks rendering in some PDF files (e.g. the one from issue 6737).
It thus appears that we don't have any test-coverage for this code-path, and given the relative complexity of the PDF files affected by this bug I wasn't able to easily create a reduced test-case.
*Please note:* The linked test-case included in this patch is currently *not* rendered correctly (that'd be the PR 6606), but it at least gives us some test-coverage here.
I recall being confused as to the purpose of the `encrypted` property all the way back when working on PR 4750.
Looking at the history, this property was added in PR 1698 when password support was added to the API/viewer. However, its only purpose seem to have been to facilitate the addition of a `isEncrypted` function in the API. That function never, as far as I can tell, saw any use and was unceremoniously removed in PR 4144.
Since we want to avoid sending all non-essential data early during initial document loading (e.g. PR 4750), it seems correct to get rid of the `encrypted` property. Especially since it hasn't even been exposed in the API for over three years, with no complaints that I'm aware of.
Finally note that the `encrypt` property on the `XRef` instance isn't tied to the code that's being removed here. Given that we're calling `PDFDocument.parse` during `createDocumentHandler` in the worker which, via `PDFDocument.setup`, calls `XRef.parse` where the `Encrypt` data (if it exists) is always parsed.
Please note that while this could be considered a regression in user-facing behaviour, I'm not convinced that it's really a regression as such since prior to PR 8912 the Metadata would fail to parse (with an XML error) and thus be ignored when setting the viewer title.
With the refactored Metadata parsing we're now able to parse this, which uncovered issues with a subset of broken Ghostscript Metadata that uses HTML character names.
Fixes https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1424938
Unless the debugging tools (i.e. `PDFBug`) are enabled, or the `browsertest` is running, the `PDFPageProxy.stats` aren't actually used for anything.
Rather than initializing unnecessary `StatTimer` instances, we can simply re-use *one* dummy class (with static methods) for every page. Note that by using a dummy `StatTimer` in this way, rather than letting `PDFPageProxy.stats` be undefined, we don't need to guard *every* single stats collection callsite.
Since it wouldn't make much sense to attempt to use `PDFPageProxy.stats` when stat collection is disabled, it was instead changed to a "private" property (i.e. `PDFPageProxy._stats`) and a getter was added for accessing `PDFPageProxy.stats`. This getter will now return `null` when stat collection is disabled, making that case easy to handle.
For benchmarking purposes, the test-suite used to re-create the `StatTimer` after loading/rendering each page. However, modifying properties on various API code from the outside in this way seems very error-prone, and is an anti-pattern that we really should avoid at all cost. Hence the `PDFPageProxy.cleanup` method was modified to accept an optional parameter, which will take care of resetting `this.stats` when necessary, and `test/driver.js` was updated accordingly.
Finally, a tiny bit more validation was added on the viewer side, to ensure that all the code we're attempting to access is defined when handling `PDFPageProxy` stats.
