Having this parameter among a list of DOM-elements seems slightly strange now, however this is very old code hence the explanation for why this was done is for historical reasons (as is often the case).
Hence we can simply move this into `AppOptions` instead, which seems more appropriate overall.
Given that only the GENERIC viewer supports opening more than one PDF document, we can simplify things a tiny bit by instead generating the necessary DOM-element in JavaScript.
The `DefaultExternalServices` code, which is used to provide build-specific functionality, is very old. This results in a pattern where we first initialize `PDFViewerApplication.externalServices` and then *override* it for the different builds.
By converting `DefaultExternalServices` into a "regular" class, and leveraging import maps, we can directly initialize the correct instance depending on the build.
Given the simplicity of the `createPreferences` method, we can leverage import maps to directly initialize the correct `Preferences`-instance depending on the build.
Given the simplicity of the `createDownloadManager` method, we can leverage import maps to directly initialize the correct `DownloadManager`-instance depending on the build.
The latest mozilla-central update has test failures, because some CSS variables are not "properly" referenced; in particular:
- Give `--hcm-highlight-selected-filter` a default value, of `none`, similar to the previously existing HCM filter.
- Remove the `--mix-blend-mode` variable, since it's unused.
This manually ignores some cases where the resulting auto-formatting would not, as far as I'm concerned, constitute a readability improvement or where we'd just end up with more overall indentation.
Please see https://eslint.org/docs/latest/rules/arrow-body-style
For arrow functions that are both simple and short, we can avoid using explicit `return` to shorten them even further without hurting readability.
For the `gulp mozcentral` build-target this reduces the overall size of the output by just under 1 kilo-byte (which isn't a lot but still can't hurt).
In order to do that we must change the text layer opacity to 1 but
it has several implications:
- the selection color must have an alpha component,
- the background color of the span used for highlighted words
must have an alpha component either, but now the opacity is 1
we can use some backdrop-filters in HCM making the highlighted
words more visible.
- fix a regression caused by #17196: the css variable --hcm-highlight-filter
has to live under the #viewer element because in HCM it's overwritten
by js at this level, hence links annotations for example didn't
have the right colors when hovered.
The free highlighting is enabled when the mouse pointer isn't on some text.
Then we draw a shape with smoothed borders corresponding to the movement of
the mouse.
Printing/saving and changing the thickness will come later.
By always removing the "visibilitychange" listener in the `PDFViewer.#onePageRenderedOrForceFetch`-method we can (ever so slightly) reduce duplication in the code.
The system locale (used in OffscreenCanvas) can be different from the one guessed by Fluent,
consequently, in order to avoid any mismatch, we just use an attached canvas element.
The original issue can easily be reproduced locally in adding a lang="ja" in viewer.html
(or with an other language for Japanese users).
With modern JavaScript class features we can move the relevant event handling into private methods, and thus invoke it directly when resetting the toolbar UI-state.
*Please note:* This patch slightly reduces the size of the `web/secondary_toolbar.js` file.
With modern JavaScript class features we can move the relevant event handling into private methods, and thus invoke it directly when resetting the toolbar UI-state.
*Please note:* This patch slightly reduces the size of the `web/toolbar.js` file.
When opening a pdf from the secondary toolbar, a second color picker is added.
So in order to avoid that, we just stop listening for annotationeditoruimanager
in the toolbar.
The doorhanger for highlighting has a basic color picker composed of 5 predefined colors
to set the default color to use.
These colors can be changed thanks to a preference for now but it's something which could
be changed in the Firefox settings in the future.
Each highlight has in its own toolbar a color picker to just change its color.
The different color pickers are so similar (modulo few differences in their styles) that
this patch introduces a new class ColorPicker which provides a color picker component
which could be reused in future editors.
All in all, a large part of this patch is dedicated to color picker itself and its style
and the rest is almost a matter of wiring the component.
This unfortunately broke in PR 17060, since I had completely forgotten about https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1632644#c5 when writing that patch.
The easiest solution, while slightly unfortunate, seems to be to add a couple of non-standard hash parameters specifically for the PDF attachment use-case in the Firefox PDF Viewer. (Note that we cannot use "nameddest" here, since we also need to support the stringified destination-Array case.)
Given that this event listener is only used to trigger rendering after the sidebar has been opened/closed, we can utilize the existing one in the `PDFSidebar` class for this purpose instead. That one is registered on the sidebar DOM-element, and is needed to remove a CSS-class indicating that the sidebar is moving.
It fixes few errors in the CSS for HCM.
It now complies to the specs from UI/UX.
Only the foreground must change in HCM and not the background, similarly to what
we had for the alt-text button before moving it.
After the two previous commits, which removed the remaining call-sites, this method is no longer used and can thus be removed.
As mentioned in the JSDocs for the now removed method, synchronous communication between the viewer and the platform code isn't really a good idea.
Once this patch has landed in mozilla-central some additional clean-up of the platform code will also be possible.
The return value is not, nor has it ever been, used for anything and we should thus be able to just send the message.
Note that the responses are already handled by the "message" event listener registered above.
