Please note that this functionality has never really mattered for the Firefox PDF Viewer, the GENERIC viewer, or even the "simpleviewer"/"singlepageviewer" component-examples. Hence, in practice this means that only the "pageviewer" component-example[1] have ever really utilized this.
Using factories to initialize various layers in the viewer, rather than simply invoking the relevant code directly, seems (at least to me) like a somewhat roundabout way of doing things.
Not only does this lead to more code, both to write and maintain, but since many of the layers have common parameters (e.g. an `AnnotationStorage`-instance) there's also some duplication.
Hence this patch, which removes the `textLayerFactory` and instead uses a lookup-function in the `PDFPageView`-class to access the external viewer-properties as necessary.
Note that this should even be an improvement for the "pageviewer" component-example, since most layers will now work by default rather than require manual configuration.
---
[1] In practice we generally suggest using the "simpleviewer", or "singlepageviewer", since it does *most* things out-of-the-box and given that a lot of functionality really require *a viewer* and not just a single page in order to work.
Please note that this functionality has never really mattered for the Firefox PDF Viewer, the GENERIC viewer, or even the "simpleviewer"/"singlepageviewer" component-examples. Hence, in practice this means that only the "pageviewer" component-example[1] have ever really utilized this.
Using factories to initialize various layers in the viewer, rather than simply invoking the relevant code directly, seems (at least to me) like a somewhat roundabout way of doing things.
Not only does this lead to more code, both to write and maintain, but since many of the layers have common parameters (e.g. an `AnnotationStorage`-instance) there's also some duplication.
Hence this patch, which removes the `textHighlighterFactory` and instead uses a lookup-function in the `PDFPageView`-class to access the external viewer-properties as necessary.
Note that this should even be an improvement for the "pageviewer" component-example, since most layers will now work by default rather than require manual configuration.
---
[1] In practice we generally suggest using the "simpleviewer", or "singlepageviewer", since it does *most* things out-of-the-box and given that a lot of functionality really require *a viewer* and not just a single page in order to work.
Please note that this functionality has never really mattered for the Firefox PDF Viewer, the GENERIC viewer, or even the "simpleviewer"/"singlepageviewer" component-examples. Hence, in practice this means that only the "pageviewer" component-example[1] have ever really utilized this.
Using factories to initialize various layers in the viewer, rather than simply invoking the relevant code directly, seems (at least to me) like a somewhat roundabout way of doing things.
Not only does this lead to more code, both to write and maintain, but since many of the layers have common parameters (e.g. an `AnnotationStorage`-instance) there's also some duplication.
Hence this patch, which removes the `structTreeLayerFactory` and instead uses a lookup-function in the `PDFPageView`-class to access the external viewer-properties as necessary.
Note that this should even be an improvement for the "pageviewer" component-example, since most layers will now work by default rather than require manual configuration.
---
[1] In practice we generally suggest using the "simpleviewer", or "singlepageviewer", since it does *most* things out-of-the-box and given that a lot of functionality really require *a viewer* and not just a single page in order to work.
Please note that this functionality has never really mattered for the Firefox PDF Viewer, the GENERIC viewer, or even the "simpleviewer"/"singlepageviewer" component-examples. Hence, in practice this means that only the "pageviewer" component-example[1] have ever really utilized this.
Using factories to initialize various layers in the viewer, rather than simply invoking the relevant code directly, seems (at least to me) like a somewhat roundabout way of doing things.
Not only does this lead to more code, both to write and maintain, but since many of the layers have common parameters (e.g. an `AnnotationStorage`-instance) there's also some duplication.
Hence this patch, which removes the `annotationLayerFactory` and instead uses a lookup-function in the `PDFPageView`-class to access the external viewer-properties as necessary.
Note that this should even be an improvement for the "pageviewer" component-example, since most layers will now work by default rather than require manual configuration.
---
[1] In practice we generally suggest using the "simpleviewer", or "singlepageviewer", since it does *most* things out-of-the-box and given that a lot of functionality really require *a viewer* and not just a single page in order to work.
Please note that this functionality has never really mattered for the Firefox PDF Viewer, the GENERIC viewer, or even the "simpleviewer"/"singlepageviewer" component-examples. Hence, in practice this means that only the "pageviewer" component-example[1] have ever really utilized this.
Using factories to initialize various layers in the viewer, rather than simply invoking the relevant code directly, seems (at least to me) like a somewhat roundabout way of doing things.
Not only does this lead to more code, both to write and maintain, but since many of the layers have common parameters (e.g. an `AnnotationStorage`-instance) there's also some duplication.
Hence this patch, which removes the `annotationEditorLayerFactory` and instead uses a lookup-function in the `PDFPageView`-class to access the external viewer-properties as necessary.
Note that this should even be an improvement for the "pageviewer" component-example, since most layers will now work by default rather than require manual configuration.
---
[1] In practice we generally suggest using the "simpleviewer", or "singlepageviewer", since it does *most* things out-of-the-box and given that a lot of functionality really require *a viewer* and not just a single page in order to work.
Currently we'll only initialize and render the `annotationEditorLayer` once the regular `annotationLayer` has been rendered.
While it obviously makes sense to render the `annotationEditorLayer` *last*, the way that the code is currently written means that if a third-party user disables the `annotationLayer` then the editing-functionality indirectly becomes disabled as well.
Given that this seems like a somewhat arbitrary limitation, this patch simply decouples these two layers while still keeping the rendering order consistent.
By moving this code the "pageviewer"-component example will become slightly more usable on its own, it may simplify a future addition of XFA Foreground document support, and finally also serves as preparation for the following patches.
The container position and dimensions should be almost constant, hence
it's pretty useless to query them on each rescale.
Finally it avoids to trigger some reflows.
First of all, given the screen-sizes of most mobile phones using Spread modes is unlikely to be useful.
Secondly, and more importantly, since there's (currently) no UI available for the user to override a PDF document-specified Spread mode this would result in a bad UX otherwise.
Also, removes an outdated comment from the `apiPageLayoutToViewerModes` helper function.
Previously we'd abort all parsing if an Error was encountered, despite the fact that multiple `startXRefQueue`-entries may be available and that continued parsing could thus eventually be able to find usable data.
Note that in the referenced PDF document the `startxref`-operator, at the end of the file, points to a position in the middle of an arbitrary `stream` which is why things break.
Depending on e.g. the `textLayerMode` option it might not actually be necessary to always initialize this eagerly.
*Please note:* Unfortunately we cannot `shadow` a private field, hence why this is only made semi-"private".
This is done to support upcoming viewer-changes, and in order to prevent third-party users from outright breaking things we'll simply ignore too large values.
It's a follow-up of #14950: some format actions are ran when the document is open
but we must be sure we've everything ready for that, hence we have to run some
named actions before runnig the global format.
In playing with the form, I discovered that the blur event wasn't triggered when
JS called `setFocus` (because in such a case the mouse was never down). So I removed
the mouseState thing to just use the correct commitKey when blur is triggered by a
TAB key.
In order to move the annotations in the DOM to have something which corresponds
to the visual order, we need to have their dimensions/positions which means that
the parent must have some dimensions.
While reviewing recent patches, I couldn't help but noticing that we now have a lot of call-sites that manually access the `PageViewport.viewBox`-property.
Rather than repeating that verbatim all over the code-base, this patch adds a lazily computed and cached getter for this data instead.
This was essentially done only to compensate for the viewer calling `PDFPageProxy.getAnnotations` unconditionally on every annotationLayer-rendering invocation. With the previous patch that's no longer happening, and this API-caching should thus no longer be necessary.
For pages without any annotations, applies e.g. to the `tracemonkey.pdf` document, we'll repeatedly try to re-create the `annotationLayer` on every zoom and rotation operation.
The reason that this happens is because we don't insert the `annotationLayer`-div into the DOM unless there's annotations present on the page, which thus means that we miss the existing `annotationLayer`-caching present in the `PDFPageView` implementation.
This is a very old issue, and the easiest solution is to simply always insert an *empty* (and hidden) `annotationLayer`-div such that the existing code/caching starts working for the "no annotations" case as well.
Note that this is consistent with other layers, since e.g. the `textLayer` and/or `annotationEditorLayer` may be empty. Given that only a limited, by default ten, number of pages are ever active at once the additional DOM-elements shouldn't effect things negatively here.
This is consistent with the `render` methods of the other layers, and reduces overall indentation in the method.
Furthermore, don't "swallow" errors since the `PDFPageView._renderXfaLayer` method is already able to deal with that.
