Since there are no script engine with XFA, the FormCalc parser is not used irl.
The bug @nmtigor noticed was hidden by another one (the wrong check on `match`).
After the changes in PR 14112 the `PDFViewer`-class is now "identical" to the `BaseViewer`-class and the `PDFSinglePageViewer`-class is just a very thin wrapper around the `BaseViewer`-class.
Hence we can rename these files, and also remove the abstract `BaseViewer`-class, which helps reduce some unnecessary "closures" in the *built* viewer.
*Please note:* These changes are made in two separate commits, to allow GitHub to preserve `blame` for the affected files.
After the changes in PR 14112 the `PDFViewer`-class is now "identical" to the `BaseViewer`-class and the `PDFSinglePageViewer`-class is just a very thin wrapper around the `BaseViewer`-class.
Hence we can rename these files, and also remove the abstract `BaseViewer`-class, which helps reduce some unnecessary "closures" in the *built* viewer.
*Please note:* These changes are made in two separate commits, to allow GitHub to preserve `blame` for the affected files.
Note that this patch implements the `SetOCGState`-handling in `PDFLinkService`, rather than as a new method in `OptionalContentConfig`[1], since this action is nothing but a series of `setVisibility`-calls and that it seems quite uncommon in real-world PDF documents.
The new functionality also required some tweaks in the `PDFLayerViewer`, to ensure that the `layersView` in the sidebar is updated correctly when the optional-content visibility changes from "outside" of `PDFLayerViewer`.
---
[1] We can obviously move this code into `OptionalContentConfig` instead, if deemed necessary, but for an initial implementation I figured that doing it this way might be acceptable.
Apparently this is implemented in e.g. Adobe Reader, and the specification does support it, however it cannot be commonly used in real-world PDF documents since it took over ten years for this feature to be requested.
This was moved into the `src/display/`-folder in PR 15110, for the initial editor-a11y patch. However, with the changes in PR 15237 we're again only using `binarySearchFirstItem` in the `web/`-folder and it thus seem reasonable to move it back there.
The primary reason for moving it back is that `binarySearchFirstItem` is currently exposed in the public API, and we always want to avoid that unless it's either PDF-related functionality or code that simply must be shared between the `src/`- and `web/`-folders. In this case, `binarySearchFirstItem` is a general helper function that doesn't really satisfy either of those alternatives.
While this has always worked, as a consequence of the implementation, it's never been officially supported.
In addition to adding basic unit-tests, this patch also introduces a couple of new JSDoc `@typedef`s in the API to avoid overly long lines.
An annotation doesn't have to be in the text flow, hence it's likely a bad idea
to insert its text in the text layer. But the text must be visible from a screen
reader point of view so it must somewhere in the DOM.
So with this patch, the text from a FreeText annotation is extracted and added in
a div in its HTML counterpart, and with the patch #15237 the text should be visible
and positioned relatively to the text flow.
To improve performance of the sidebar we use the page-canvases to generate the thumbnails whenever possible, since that avoids unnecessary re-rendering when the sidebar is open. This works generally well, however there's an old problem in PDF documents that contain interactive forms (when those are enabled): Note how the thumbnails become partially (or fully) blank, since those Annotations are not included in the OperatorList.[1]
We obviously want to keep using the `PDFThumbnailView.setImage`-method for most documents, however we need a way to skip it only for those pages that contain interactive forms.
As it turns out it's unfortunately not all that simple to tell, after the fact, from looking only at the OperatorList that some Annotations were skipped. While it might have been possible to try and infer that in the viewer, it'd not have been pretty considering that at the time when rendering finishes the annotationLayer has not yet been built.
The overall simplest solution that I could come up with, was instead to include a *summary* of the interactive form-state when doing the final "flushing" of the OperatorList and expose that information in the API.
---
[1] Some examples from our test-suite: `annotation-tx2.pdf` where the thumbnail is completely blank, and `bug1737260.pdf` where the thumbnail is missing the "buttons" found on the page.
Currently some `OPS.beginAnnotation` arguments will contain a `Number` value for the `isUsingOwnCanvas`-parameter, or in some cases an `undefined` value, which is inconsistent from an API perspective.
The previous version was maybe functional but definitely painful to maintain
(maybe more efficient... I don't know) so this patch aims to simplify it and
it adds some basic unit tests.
- In the annotationEditorLayer, reorder the editors in the DOM according
the position of the elements on the screen;
- add an aria-owns attribute on the "nearest" element in the text layer
which points to the added editor.
Note that these cases, which are all in older code, were found using the [`unicorn/no-for-loop`](https://github.com/sindresorhus/eslint-plugin-unicorn/blob/main/docs/rules/no-for-loop.md) ESLint plugin rule.
However, note that I've opted not to enable this rule by default since there's still *some* cases where I do think that it makes sense to allow "regular" for-loops.
Rather than including all of this external code in the PDF.js repository, we should be using the npm package instead.
Unfortunately this is slightly more complicated than you'd hope, since the `fit-curve` package (which is older) isn't directly compatible with modern JavaScript modules.
In particular, the following cases needed to be considered:
- For the development viewer (i.e. `gulp server`) and the unit-tests, we thus need to build a fitCurve-bundle that can be directly `import`ed.
- For the actual PDF.js build-targets, we can slightly reduce the sizes by depending on the "raw" `fit-curve` source-code.
- For the Node.js unit-tests, the `fit-curve` package can be used as-is.
- As in the annotation layer, use percent instead of pixels as unit;
- handle the rotation of the editor layer in allowing editing when rotation
angle is not zero;
- the different editors are rotated counterclockwise in order to be usable
when the main page is itself rotated;
- add support for saving/printing rotated editors.
Given that printing is triggered *synchronously* in browsers, it's thus possible for scripting (in PDF documents) to modify the Annotation-data while printing is currently ongoing.
To work-around that we add a new printing-specific `AnnotationStorage`, where the serializable data is *frozen* upon initialization, which the viewer can thus create/utilize during printing.
After the changes in PR 14998, these operators are now no-ops in the `src/display/canvas.js` code and should no longer be necessary.
Given that `beginAnnotations`/`endAnnotations` are not in the PDF specification, but are rather *custom* PDF.js operators, it seems reasonable to stop using them now that they've become no-ops.
While `TextLayerRenderTask` apparently makes sense in TypeScript environments, given that it's being returned by the `renderTextLayer`-function in the API, we really don't want to extend the *public* API by simply exporting the class directly in `src/pdf.js` since it should never be called/initialized manually.
Hence we follow the same pattern as in PR 14013, and add some very basic unit-tests to ensure that `renderTextLayer` always returns a `TextLayerRenderTask`-instance as expected.
- it aims to fix https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1771477;
- hangul contains some syllables which are decomposed when using NFD, hence
the text must be correctly shifted in case it contains some of them.
The current `lastModified`-getter, which only contains a time-stamp, is a fairly crude way of detecting if the stored data has actually been changed. In particular, when the `getRawValue`-method is used, the `lastModified`-getter doesn't cope with data being modified from the "outside".
To fix these issues[1], and to prevent any future bugs in this code, this patch introduces a new `AnnotationStorage.hash`-getter which computes a hash of the currently stored data. To simplify things this re-uses the existing `MurmurHash3_64`-implementation, which required moving that file into the `src/shared/`-folder, since its performance should be good enough here.
---
[1] Given how the `AnnotationStorage.lastModified`-getter was used, this would have been limited to *printing* of forms.
- since resetForm function reset a field value a calculateNow is consequently triggered.
But the calculate callback can itself call resetForm, hence an infinite recursive loop.
So basically, prevent calculeNow to be triggered by itself.
- in Firefox, the letters entered in some fields were duplicated: "AaBb" instead of "AB".
It was mainly because beforeInput was triggering a Keystroke which was itself triggering
an input value update and then the input event was triggered.
So in order to avoid that, beforeInput calls preventDefault and then it's up to the JS to
handle the event.
- fields have a property valueAsString which returns the value as a string. In the
implementation it was wrongly used to store the formatted value of a field (2€ when the user
entered 2). So this patch implements correctly valueAsString.
- non-rendered fields can be updated in using JS but when they're, they must take some properties
in the annotationStorage. It was implemented for field values, but it wasn't for
display, colors, ...
- it fixes#14862 and #14705.
Interestingly enough this appears to be the very first case of *encoded* dest-strings, in /GoTo destination dictionaries, that we've actually come across. What's really fascinating is that it's less than a week after issue 14847, given that these issues are *somewhat* similar.
As it turns out, most of the code-paths in the `PDFImage`-class won't actually pass the TypedArray (containing the image-data) to the `ColorSpace`-code. Hence we *generally* don't need to force the image-data to be a `Uint8ClampedArray`, and can just as well directly use a `Uint8Array` instead.
In the following cases we're returning the data without any `ColorSpace`-parsing, and the exact TypedArray used shouldn't matter:
- b72a448327/src/core/image.js (L714)
- b72a448327/src/core/image.js (L751)
In the following cases the image-data is only used *internally*, and again the exact TypedArray used shouldn't matter:
- b72a448327/src/core/image.js (L762) with the actual image-data being defined (as `Uint8ClampedArray`) further below
- b72a448327/src/core/image.js (L837)
*Please note:* This is tagged `api-minor` because it's API-observable, given that *some* image/mask-data will now be returned as `Uint8Array` rather than using `Uint8ClampedArray` unconditionally. However, that seems like a small price to pay to (slightly) reduce memory usage during image-conversion.
