This patch moves the `PDFJSDev`-checks *inline*, similar to the rest of the code-base, such that the code in question is actually being removed from the *built* files in e.g. the official releases.
- In case of large string the sandbox initialization failed because of an OOM
* so allocate a new string in the heap
* and free it after use.
- it requires a quickjs update since we need to export some symbols (stringToNewUTF8 and free).
There's no really compelling reason, as far as I can tell, to introduce the `ENABLE_SCRIPTING` build-target, instead of simply re-using the existing `TESTING` build-target for the new `gulp integrationtest` task.
In general there should be no problem with just always enable scripting in TESTING-builds, and if I were to *guess* the reason that this didn't seem to work was most likely because the Preferences ended up over-writing the `AppOptions`.
As it turns out the GENERIC-viewer has already has built-in support for disabling of Preferences, via the `AppOptions`, and this can be utilized in TESTING-builds as well to ensure that whatever `AppOptions` are set they're always respected.
* move set/clear|Timeout/Interval and crackURL code in pdf.js
* remove the "backdoor" in the proxy (used to dispatch event) and so return the dispatch function in the initializer
* remove listeners if an error occured during sandbox initialization
* add support for alert and prompt in the sandbox
* add a function to eval in the global scope
This simplifies not just this code, but the unit-tests as well, and should be sufficient as far as I can tell.
Note also that currently, in the *built* `pdf.sandbox.js` file, there's even a line reading `testMode = testMode && false;` because of an accidentally flipped pre-processor statement.
Finally, in the `scripting_spec.js` unit-test, defines `sandboxBundleSrc` at the top of the file to make it easier to find and/or change it when necessary.
There's no good reason, as far as I can tell, to use search-and-replace to include the *stringified* `pdf.scripting.js` file in the built `pdf.sandbox.js` file. Instead we could, and even should, utilize the existing `PDFJSDev.eval(...)`-functionality, which is not only simpler but will also be more efficient as well (no need for a regular expression).
The current location feels somewhat strange, and also inconsistent with the existing way that bundling is done.
Finally, add the version/build numbers at the top of the *built* `pdf.sandbox.js` files, since all other built files include that information given that it's often helpful to be able to easily determine the *exact* version.
