When there was a rotation, the generated bbox was wrong because of an inversion
between width and height.
This patch aims to fix this issue in re-writing the FreeText code generation
to have something similar to what Acrobat does.
And fix the name of the font which wasn't the correct one when calling the
evaluator.
- Update the "Getting the Code" section to specifically mention Mozilla Firefox, since while the development viewer *works* it may look slightly "broken" in Chromium-based browsers. (This is caused by a lack of support for unprefixed CSS properties, e.g. `mask-image`, however this does *not* affect the built PDF.js viewer.)
- Remove the Twitter-link, since that account has not been updated since 2016 (i.e. over seven years ago).
Semantically, it is more correct to encode the fragment in the URL
instead of the URL-encoded `file` query parameter. This shouldn't matter
in practice, because `rewriteUrlClosure` in `chromecom.js` decodes the
`file` parameter and restores the fragment. However, as #16625 shows,
there was a case where this did not work as expected.
`PDFViewerApplication` reads from `location.hash` to initialize
`initialBookmark`. But when extensions/chromium/pdfHandler.js prepares
the redirect URL, the reference fragment is encoded instead of bare.
`rewriteUrlClosure` in `chromecom.js` is responsible for decoding the
URL, but that currently runs too late.
To fix this, update `initialBookmark` after rewriting the URL.
This was not a problem in the past because `rewriteUrlClosure` in
`chromecom.js` executed before the initialization of `initialBookmark`.
Given that the PDF.js library has never officially supported/documented that binary data can be provided as a `Buffer`, and that it's been explicitly deprecated in *four* releases, it seems reasonable that we outright reject such data instead (to reduce the amount of Node.js specific code-paths).
We've now been throwing an Error in *three* releases if the `canvasFactory` option is provided, hence it ought to be fine to stop doing that and simply ignore the option instead.
Rather than having to *manually* determine the potential `transfers` at various spots in the API, we can let the `AnnotationStorage.serializable` getter include this.
To further simplify things, we can also let the `serializable` getter compute and include the `hash`-string as well.
These options are completely unused in the PDF.js viewer, and given that the last update of the `GrabToPan`-code from upstream was in 2016 it shouldn't hurt to remove them.
Before this commit, lint-chromium complained without an obvious course
of action:
> Warning: Pref objects doesn't have the same length.
> Error: chromium/preferences_schema is not in sync
With this commit, the error message is more actionable:
> Warning: extensions/chromium/preferences_schema.json does not contain an entry for pref: enableFloatingToolbar
> Error: chromium/preferences_schema is not in sync
This is something that I completely overlooked during review of PR 16593, since the idea is (obviously) that the viewer-components should be usable as-is without the user needing to manually pass in any *additional* parameters.
To support this we can very easily expose the current `FilterFactory`-instance on the `PDFPageProxy`-class[1], and if needed initialize the highlight-filters when initializing the page (again limited to the viewer-components).
In order to minimize the size the of a saved pdf, we generate only one
image and use a reference in each annotation using it.
When printing, it's slightly different since we have to render each page
independantly but we use the same image within a page.
- Modify the text and background colors in popup to fit a11y requirements
- Add a backdrop filter on clickable areas in using a svg filter mapping
canvas colors to Highlight and HighlightText ones.
It occurred to me that we can actually run this unit-test in Node.js environments by making use of the preprocessor to stub out the browser globals there.
Given that nullish coalescing is now available in all environments/browser that we support, we can (ever so slightly) simplify handling of the `TESTING` build-target.
