Note that this patch prepends the document title with "* ", rather than only "*" as suggested in the bug, since there's nothing that says that a PDF document cannot specify a title[1] beginning with an asterisk. To reduce possible confusion, having a space between the "editing marker" and the actual document title thus cannot hurt as far as I'm concerned.
In order to notify the viewer when all `AnnotationEditor`s have been removed, we utilize the existing `onAnnotationEditor`-callback to allow the document title to be updated as necessary.
Finally, this patch makes the following (slightly unrelated) changes:
- Rename the `AnnotationStorage.removeKey` method to just `AnnotationStorage.remove` instead. This is consistent with e.g. the `has`-method and should suffice to explain what it does.
- Remove the `AnnotationStorage.hasAnnotationEditors` getter, since the viewer now tracks the necessary state internally. This avoids unnecessarily having to iterate through the `AnnotationStorage`-instance when saving/printing the document.
---
[1] Using either an /Info dictionary or a /Metadata stream.
This functionality has never been used anywhere in the PDF.js library/viewer itself, since it was added in 2013.
Furthermore this functionality is, and has always been, *completely untested* and also unmaintained.
Finally, there's (at least) one old issue about `appendImage` not returning the correct position; see issue 4182.
All-in-all, it seems that keeping very old, untested, unmaintained, and partially broken code around probably isn't what we want here.
(On the off-chance that any future a11y-work requires getting access to image-positions, it'd likely be much better to re-implement the necessary functionality from scratch and also make sure that it's properly tested from the beginning.)
This old method, which is only used with the `imageLayer` functionality, is essentially just a re-implementation of the existing `Util.applyTransform` method.
*This is a follow-up to PR 14869.*
In the old code we're accidentally "swallowing" part of the event-details, which explains why the annotationLayer didn't render.
One thing that made debugging a lot harder was the lack of error messages, from the viewer, and a few `PDFPageView`-methods were updated to improve this situation.
- Remove the `typeof Worker` check, since all browsers have had `Worker` support for many years now; see https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Worker#browser_compatibility
Furthermore the `new Worker(...)` call is wrapped in try-catch, which means that we'll still fallback to "fake workers" if necessary.
- Limit the `fallbackWorkerSrc` handling, in the `PDFWorker.workerSrc` getter, to only GENERIC builds since that's the only place where it's defined anyway.
Given that the code is written with JavaScript module-syntax, none of this functionality will "leak" outside of this file with these change.
By removing this closure the file-size is decreased, even for the *built* `pdf.worker.js` file, since there's now less overall indentation in the code.
This was moved into the `src/display/`-folder in PR 15110, for the initial editor-a11y patch. However, with the changes in PR 15237 we're again only using `binarySearchFirstItem` in the `web/`-folder and it thus seem reasonable to move it back there.
The primary reason for moving it back is that `binarySearchFirstItem` is currently exposed in the public API, and we always want to avoid that unless it's either PDF-related functionality or code that simply must be shared between the `src/`- and `web/`-folders. In this case, `binarySearchFirstItem` is a general helper function that doesn't really satisfy either of those alternatives.
Given that the code is written with JavaScript module-syntax, none of this functionality will "leak" outside of this file with these changes.
For e.g. the `gulp mozcentral` command the *built* `pdf.worker.js` file-size decreases `~2 kB` with this patch, and most of the improvement comes from having less overall indentation in the code.
Given that the code is written with JavaScript module-syntax, none of this functionality will "leak" outside of this file with these changes.
By removing this closure the file-size is decreased, even for the *built* `pdf.worker.js` file, since there's now less overall indentation in the code.
This patch doesn't structurally change the text layer: it just adds some aria-owns
attributes to some spans.
The aria-owns attribute expect to have an element id, hence it's why it adds back an
id on the element rendering an annotation, but this id is built in using crypto.randomUUID
to avoid any potential issues with the hash in the url.
The elements in the annotation layer are moved into the DOM in order to have them in the
same "order" as they visually are.
The overall goal is to help screen readers to present to the user the annotations as
they visually are and as they come in the text flow.
It is clearly not perfect, but it should improve readability for some people with visual
disabilities.
According to MDN `Path2D` is available in all browsers that we currently support, see https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Path2D#browser_compatibility
Hence only Node.js is currently lagging behind here, and requires that we keep the old code as a fallback in the `compileType3Glyph` function. However, there's an open PR in the `node-canvas` repository for adding `Path2D` support.
As far as I'm concerned, there's two possible solutions here:
- We land this patch now, since it removes unnecessary code in e.g. the Firefox PDF Viewer, which means that compilation of Type3 glyphs will be disabled in Node.js until that PR is landed.[1]
If users report bugs about Type3 glyphs looking "inconsistent" in Node.js and/or being slow to render, we could perhaps encourage them to upvote and otherwise help out getting that PR landed?
- We wait for the mentioned PR to land *first*, before moving forward with this patch. Given that there's been no updates on that PR for almost two months, this alternative may possibly take a while.
---
[1] Note that Type3 fonts are first of all not very common in PDF documents, and secondly that compilation only applies specifically to Type3 glyphs that contain /ImageMask-data (i.e. not all Type3 fonts are affected).
While this has always worked, as a consequence of the implementation, it's never been officially supported.
In addition to adding basic unit-tests, this patch also introduces a couple of new JSDoc `@typedef`s in the API to avoid overly long lines.
By doing this in the worker-thread this code will only need to run *once*, whereas currently re-rendering of a page forces this to be repeated (e.g. after it's been scrolled out-of-view and then back into view again).
When a FreeText editor is pasted then it hasn't an editorDiv yet when added
to the layer, hence it's empty.
So this patch just move the call to addToAnnotationStorage to ensure we've
what we need.
An annotation doesn't have to be in the text flow, hence it's likely a bad idea
to insert its text in the text layer. But the text must be visible from a screen
reader point of view so it must somewhere in the DOM.
So with this patch, the text from a FreeText annotation is extracted and added in
a div in its HTML counterpart, and with the patch #15237 the text should be visible
and positioned relatively to the text flow.
To improve performance of the sidebar we use the page-canvases to generate the thumbnails whenever possible, since that avoids unnecessary re-rendering when the sidebar is open. This works generally well, however there's an old problem in PDF documents that contain interactive forms (when those are enabled): Note how the thumbnails become partially (or fully) blank, since those Annotations are not included in the OperatorList.[1]
We obviously want to keep using the `PDFThumbnailView.setImage`-method for most documents, however we need a way to skip it only for those pages that contain interactive forms.
As it turns out it's unfortunately not all that simple to tell, after the fact, from looking only at the OperatorList that some Annotations were skipped. While it might have been possible to try and infer that in the viewer, it'd not have been pretty considering that at the time when rendering finishes the annotationLayer has not yet been built.
The overall simplest solution that I could come up with, was instead to include a *summary* of the interactive form-state when doing the final "flushing" of the OperatorList and expose that information in the API.
---
[1] Some examples from our test-suite: `annotation-tx2.pdf` where the thumbnail is completely blank, and `bug1737260.pdf` where the thumbnail is missing the "buttons" found on the page.
Currently some `OPS.beginAnnotation` arguments will contain a `Number` value for the `isUsingOwnCanvas`-parameter, or in some cases an `undefined` value, which is inconsistent from an API perspective.
