There's three notable exceptions here:
- The `saveDocument` one is converted into a permanent `warn`, since it still works when the `annotationStorage` is empty although it's (obviously) less efficient than `getData`.
- The `fallbackWorkerSrc` functionality (for browsers), since just removing it would risk too much third-party breakage.
- The SVG back-end, since a final decision is yet to be made. (It might be completely removed, or left as-is in an essentially "frozen" state.)
Note that this patch prepends the document title with "* ", rather than only "*" as suggested in the bug, since there's nothing that says that a PDF document cannot specify a title[1] beginning with an asterisk. To reduce possible confusion, having a space between the "editing marker" and the actual document title thus cannot hurt as far as I'm concerned.
In order to notify the viewer when all `AnnotationEditor`s have been removed, we utilize the existing `onAnnotationEditor`-callback to allow the document title to be updated as necessary.
Finally, this patch makes the following (slightly unrelated) changes:
- Rename the `AnnotationStorage.removeKey` method to just `AnnotationStorage.remove` instead. This is consistent with e.g. the `has`-method and should suffice to explain what it does.
- Remove the `AnnotationStorage.hasAnnotationEditors` getter, since the viewer now tracks the necessary state internally. This avoids unnecessarily having to iterate through the `AnnotationStorage`-instance when saving/printing the document.
---
[1] Using either an /Info dictionary or a /Metadata stream.
The password dialog can be cancelled in three different ways:
- By clicking on its "Cancel"-button.
- By pressing the Escape-key.
- By force-opening another dialog, although this shouldn't happen in practice.
Here the "Cancel"-button case is slightly special since it'll trigger `PasswordPrompt.#cancel` *twice*, first directly via the click and secondly via the "close" event on the `dialog`-element.
While this shouldn't, as far as I know, cause any bugs it's nonetheless inconsistent with the other cases outlined above. To improve this we can simply attempt to *close* the password dialog instead, and then rely on the "close" event to run the `PasswordPrompt.#cancel` method.
Currently in `disableWorker=true` mode it's possible that opening of password-protected PDF documents outright fails, if an *incorrect* password is entered. Apparently the event ordering is subtly different in the non-Worker case, which causes the password-callback to be updated *before* the dialog has been fully closed.
To avoid that we'll utilize a `PromiseCapability` to keep track of the state of the password dialog, such that we can delay both re-opening and (importantly) updating of the password-callback until doing so is safe.
This patch *may* also fix issue 15330, but it's impossible for me to tell.
*This is a follow-up to PR 14869.*
In the old code we're accidentally "swallowing" part of the event-details, which explains why the annotationLayer didn't render.
One thing that made debugging a lot harder was the lack of error messages, from the viewer, and a few `PDFPageView`-methods were updated to improve this situation.
This was moved into the `src/display/`-folder in PR 15110, for the initial editor-a11y patch. However, with the changes in PR 15237 we're again only using `binarySearchFirstItem` in the `web/`-folder and it thus seem reasonable to move it back there.
The primary reason for moving it back is that `binarySearchFirstItem` is currently exposed in the public API, and we always want to avoid that unless it's either PDF-related functionality or code that simply must be shared between the `src/`- and `web/`-folders. In this case, `binarySearchFirstItem` is a general helper function that doesn't really satisfy either of those alternatives.
Currently when the `TextAccessibilityManager.enabled` method is called, we'll update `aria-owns` for any pre-existing elements. This obviously makes sense when e.g. zooming/rotating in the viewer, since the annotationLayer/annotationEditorLayer is kept in those cases.
However when the page is *fully* reset, e.g. as result of going out-of-view and thus being evicted from the cache, we still keep the `#textNodes`-Map around. This causes us to set the `aria-owns` attribute (in the textLayer) for an element that doesn't actually exist any more, which as far as I'm concerned seems incorrect. In this case the element will simply, as already implemented, be re-inserted when the annotationLayer/annotationEditorLayer renders again.
This patch doesn't structurally change the text layer: it just adds some aria-owns
attributes to some spans.
The aria-owns attribute expect to have an element id, hence it's why it adds back an
id on the element rendering an annotation, but this id is built in using crypto.randomUUID
to avoid any potential issues with the hash in the url.
The elements in the annotation layer are moved into the DOM in order to have them in the
same "order" as they visually are.
The overall goal is to help screen readers to present to the user the annotations as
they visually are and as they come in the text flow.
It is clearly not perfect, but it should improve readability for some people with visual
disabilities.
This exports the same constants as the viewer components, but in the default viewer. To avoid bloating the global-scope the constants are added to a new `PDFViewerApplicationConstants` object[1], which also allows us to skip this in builds where it's not actually needed (e.g. the Firefox *built-in* PDF Viewer).
*Please note:* I'm not completely sold on this idea, and thus wouldn't mind the patch being rejected, since we probably don't want to export every single viewer constant this way. (And it may seem a bit arbitrary, to users, why some constants are exported and others are not.)
---
[1] Somewhat similar to the existing `PDFViewerApplicationOptions` structure.
In addition to the existing `LinkTarget` constant, used by the `PDFLinkService`-constructor, this patch exports the following constants in the viewer components:
- `ScrollMode` and `SpreadMode`, since the `BaseViewer` has getters/setters which work with those constants.
- `RenderingStates`, since that one may be helpful when using `PDFPageView` directly.
By invoking the `reset` methods *last* in the `Toolbar`/`SecondaryToolbar`-constructors, we ensure that the "toolbarreset"/"secondarytoolbarreset"-events are actually handle when the viewer loads. Note that previously those events were dispatched *before* the relevant event-listeners had been attached.
With this small change we can avoid inconsistent initial toolbar-state, specifically in the case when the viewer is *reloaded* (since Firefox keeps the HTML-state on "soft" reloads).
An annotation doesn't have to be in the text flow, hence it's likely a bad idea
to insert its text in the text layer. But the text must be visible from a screen
reader point of view so it must somewhere in the DOM.
So with this patch, the text from a FreeText annotation is extracted and added in
a div in its HTML counterpart, and with the patch #15237 the text should be visible
and positioned relatively to the text flow.
Given that this image is intended specifically for the default viewer, we simply use the CSS preprocessor to remove the image reference in the `gulp components` build.
Considering that the issue only affects a CSS file, I don't believe that replacing the *just released* PDF.js version is actually necessary here.
It doesn't make sense to use a page-canvas that's *smaller* than the resulting thumbnail, since that causes the image to be upscaled which results in a blurry thumbnail. Note that this doesn't normally happen, unless a very small zoom-level is used in the viewer.
To improve performance of the sidebar we use the page-canvases to generate the thumbnails whenever possible, since that avoids unnecessary re-rendering when the sidebar is open. This works generally well, however there's an old problem in PDF documents that contain interactive forms (when those are enabled): Note how the thumbnails become partially (or fully) blank, since those Annotations are not included in the OperatorList.[1]
We obviously want to keep using the `PDFThumbnailView.setImage`-method for most documents, however we need a way to skip it only for those pages that contain interactive forms.
As it turns out it's unfortunately not all that simple to tell, after the fact, from looking only at the OperatorList that some Annotations were skipped. While it might have been possible to try and infer that in the viewer, it'd not have been pretty considering that at the time when rendering finishes the annotationLayer has not yet been built.
The overall simplest solution that I could come up with, was instead to include a *summary* of the interactive form-state when doing the final "flushing" of the OperatorList and expose that information in the API.
---
[1] Some examples from our test-suite: `annotation-tx2.pdf` where the thumbnail is completely blank, and `bug1737260.pdf` where the thumbnail is missing the "buttons" found on the page.
Currently all of these factories take a bunch of (randomly ordered) parameters, which first of all doesn't look that nice in the `PDFPageView`-class when some parameters are optional.
Furthermore, it also makes deprecation/removal of any existing parameter a *potentially* breaking change.
Finally, using an Object will provide a small amount of "documentation" at the call-site which isn't really the case with a bunch of "regular" parameters.
Note that all of the `viewer component` examples still work as-is with this patch, which is why I don't believe that we necessarily have to deprecate in the usual fashion.
Rather than always disable `PDFThumbnailView.setImage` as soon as user has changed the visibility of the Optional Content, we can utilize the new method added in the previous patch to improve thumbnail performance. Note in particular how, in the old code, even *resetting* of the Optional Content to its default state wouldn't enable `PDFThumbnailView.setImage` again.
While slightly unrelated, this patch also removes the `PDFThumbnailViewer._optionalContentConfigPromise`-property since it's completely unused.
Given that the SVG back-end is not defined anywhere except in GENERIC builds, we can remove a bit more unnecessary code in e.g. the Firefox PDF Viewer.
The elements in the annotationEditor layer are rearranged to make them
more accessible, but we must draw them in the order they have been created,
hence this patch adds a z-index to the editors.
- This way, the keyboard callbacks are called even if the page has not
the focus, hence the user doesn't have to guess that they have to click
on the page which is a bit painful especially in Ink mode.
- Add two keyboard shortcuts to commit a Freetext editor (ctrl+enter and
escape).
- In the annotationEditorLayer, reorder the editors in the DOM according
the position of the elements on the screen;
- add an aria-owns attribute on the "nearest" element in the text layer
which points to the added editor.
Given that the SVG back-end is not defined anywhere except in GENERIC builds, we can remove a little bit more unnecessary code in e.g. the Firefox PDF Viewer.
Rather than including all of this external code in the PDF.js repository, we should be using the npm package instead.
Unfortunately this is slightly more complicated than you'd hope, since the `fit-curve` package (which is older) isn't directly compatible with modern JavaScript modules.
In particular, the following cases needed to be considered:
- For the development viewer (i.e. `gulp server`) and the unit-tests, we thus need to build a fitCurve-bundle that can be directly `import`ed.
- For the actual PDF.js build-targets, we can slightly reduce the sizes by depending on the "raw" `fit-curve` source-code.
- For the Node.js unit-tests, the `fit-curve` package can be used as-is.
- this way the context menu in Firefox can take into account what we
have in the clipboard, if an editor is selected, ...
- when the user will click on a context menu item, an action will be
triggered, hence this patch adds what is required to handle it;
- some tests will be added in the Firefox' patch.
Rather than forcing the user to *manually* call `setDimensions`, which is also breaking any existing third-party code, it seems that we can simply let the `AnnotationLayer.{render, update}`-methods handle that internally.
As far as I can tell, based on testing manually in the viewer *and* running the browser-tests, everything still appears to work correctly with this patch.
- Simplify how we look-up the DOM-element, which should also be a tiny bit more efficent.
- Use private class-fields, rather than property-names prefixed with underscores.
- Inline the `#updateBar` helper-method directly in the `percent`-setter, since having a separate method doesn't seem necessary in this case.
- Set the `indeterminate`-class on the ProgressBar DOM-element, to simplify the code.
Finally, also (slightly) re-factors the `PDFViewerApplication.progress`-method to make it a bit smaller.
- for example in Dusk theme (Windows 11), black appears to be white, so
the user will draw something in white. But if they want to print or
save the used color must be black.
- fix a bug with the color input which only accepts hex string colors;
- adjust outline color of the selected/hovered editors in HCM.
Now that it's possible to change the font-size, this placeholder string feels a little bit long (especially for larger font-sizes).
Given that Editing is not enabled/released yet, I hope that it should be fine to update this without changing the l10n-id.
This replaces the boolean `annotationEditorEnabled` option/preference with a "proper" `annotationEditorMode` one. This way it's not only possible for the user to control if Editing is enabled/disabled, but also which *specific* Editing-mode should become enabled upon PDF document load.
Given that Editing is not enabled/released yet, I cannot imagine that changing the name and type of the option/preference should be an issue.
Similar to other recent patches, see e.g. PR 15057, we don't want to add these kind of `id`s to DOM-elements since they shouldn't become "linkable" through the URL hash.
*Please note:* This patch can be tested, in the viewer, with e.g. `bug1737260.pdf` from the test-suite.
- As in the annotation layer, use percent instead of pixels as unit;
- handle the rotation of the editor layer in allowing editing when rotation
angle is not zero;
- the different editors are rotated counterclockwise in order to be usable
when the main page is itself rotated;
- add support for saving/printing rotated editors.
Given that printing is triggered *synchronously* in browsers, it's thus possible for scripting (in PDF documents) to modify the Annotation-data while printing is currently ongoing.
To work-around that we add a new printing-specific `AnnotationStorage`, where the serializable data is *frozen* upon initialization, which the viewer can thus create/utilize during printing.
For encrypted PDF documents without the required permissions set, this patch adds support for disabling of Annotation-editing. However, please note that it also requires that the `pdfjs.enablePermissions` preference is set to `true` (since PDF document permissions could be seen as user hostile).[1]
As I started looking at the issue, it soon became clear that *only* trying to fix the issue without slightly re-factor the surrounding code would be somewhat difficult.
The following is an overview of the changes in this patch; sorry about the size/scope of this!
- Use a new `AnnotationEditorUIManager`-instance *for each* PDF document opened in the GENERIC viewer, to prevent user-added Annotations from "leaking" from one document into the next.
- Re-factor the `BaseViewer.#initializePermissions`-method, to simplify handling of temporarily disabled modes (e.g. for both Annotation-rendering and Annotation-editing).
- When editing is enabled, let the Editor-buttons be `disabled` until the document has loaded. This way we avoid the buttons becoming clickable temporarily, for PDF documents that use permissions.
- Slightly re-factor how the Editor-buttons are shown/hidden in the viewer, and reset the toolbar-state when a new PDF document is opened.
- Flip the order of the Editor-buttons and the pre-exising toolbarButtons in the "toolbarViewerRight"-div. (To help reduce the size, a little bit, for the PR that adds new Editor-toolbars.)
- Enable editing by default in the development viewer, i.e. `gulp server`, since having to (repeatedly) do that manually becomes annoying after a while.
- Finally, support disabling of editing when `pdfjs.enablePermissions` is set; fixes issue 15049.
---
[1] Either manually with `about:config`, or using e.g. a [Group Policy](https://github.com/mozilla/policy-templates).
- each annotation has its coordinates/dimensions expressed in percentage,
hence it's correctly positioned whatever the scale factor is;
- the font sizes are expressed in percentage too and the main font size
is scaled thanks a css var (--scale-factor);
- the rotation is now applied on the div annotationLayer;
- this patch improve the rendering of some strings where the glyph spacing
was not correct (it's a Firefox bug);
- it helps to simplify the code and it should slightly improve the update of
page (on zoom or rotation).
We want to avoid adding regular `id`s to Annotation-elements, since that means that they become "linkable" through the URL hash in a way that's not supported/intended. This could end up clashing with "named destinations", and that could easily lead to bugs; see issue 11499 and PR 11503 for some context.
Rather than using `id`s, we'll instead use a *custom* `data-element-id` attribute such that it's still possible to access the Annotation-elements directly.
Unfortunately these changes required updating most of the integration-tests, and to reduce the amount of repeated code a couple of helper functions were added.
This option is not used, nor has it ever been used, in the *built-in* Firefox PDF Viewer. Hence we can define it only for the environments where it makes sense instead.
This should really have been done as part of PR 12470, since it's now possible to directly set the `defaultUrl`-option without having to fallback to `var`-usage.
- Right now, we must select the tool, then click to select a page and
click to start drawing and it's a bit painful;
- so just create a new ink editor when we're hovering a page without one.
Given that the SVG back-end is not defined anywhere except in GENERIC builds, we can remove a little bit of unnecessary code in e.g. the Firefox PDF Viewer.
Apparently the ESLint rule added in PR 15031 wasn't able to catch all cases that can be converted, which is probably not all that surprising given how some of these call-sites look.
- Use `Element.prepend()` to insert nodes before all other ones in the element, rather than using `firstChild` with `insertBefore`-calls; see https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Element/prepend
- Fix one *incorrect* `insertBefore` call, in the AnnotationLayer-code.
Initially the patch simply changed that to an `Element.before()`-call, however that broke one of the integration-tests. It turns out that the `index` may try to access a non-existent select-child, which triggers undefined behaviour; note the warning in https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Node/insertBefore#parameters
The update in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1773794 failed, because the `editorNone` icon is identical to a pre-existing one. Given that all of the editor-icons are simply placeholders for now, we can just make a tiny change to the SVG-paths to prevent these kind of problems.
- Approximate the drawn curve by a set of Bezier curves in using
js code from https://github.com/soswow/fit-curves.
The code has been slightly modified in order to make the linter
happy.
Because of a capitalization error, the MIME type wasn't actually being set correctly. However, please note that downloading of font files still worked correctly which is probably why this has gone unnoticed since 2014.
Given the differences between XFA documents and "normal" PDF documents, we don't support editing of the former ones. Hence, when a XFA-document is opened, we temporarily disable the editor-buttons.
- Ensure that the modified-warning won't be displayed, when navigating away from the viewer, if the user has added custom Annotations and then *removed all* of them.
- Ensure that the *initial* editor-buttons state, i.e. the `toggled`-class, is correctly displayed in the toolbar when then viewer loads.
- Tweak the CSS-classes for the editor-buttons, such that they use the correct focus/hover-rules (similar to the sidebar-buttons).
- Remove a no longer accurate comment from the `BaseViewer.annotationEditorMode`-setter.
- Address a couple of *smaller* outstanding review comments, including some re-formatting changes, from PR 14976.
In PR 14710 we only included the JavaScript-part of the polyfill, however we probably need to include the CSS as well to reduce the risk of problems in older browsers.
With the recent CSS-related improvements in the `preprocess`-function we could probably have included this conditionally in the `viewer.css` file. However, considering that the `<dialog>` polyfill-code is only invoked when actually needed it seemed most appropriate/correct to lazy-load the polyfill-CSS as well.
- right now we're using the font size from the pdf itself but we use an other font
in the annotation layer. So this size doesn't really make sense and leads to bad
rendering (see pdf in #14928);
- use a sans-serif font for the fields containing text (fix issue #14736);
- remove useless padding in text-based fields (fix issue #14301);
- text fields allow/disallow scrolling bars (see bit 24 in Ff entry), so use this
value to hide/show scrollbars in annotation layer.
- it aims to fix https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1771477;
- hangul contains some syllables which are decomposed when using NFD, hence
the text must be correctly shifted in case it contains some of them.
Currently, when range-requests and/or streaming are not supported or for documents opened from `data`-URLs, we'll manually set the `contentDispositionFilename` (assuming it exists and is valid) from the `onOpenWithData`-callback in `PDFViewerApplication.initPassiveLoading`.
However, because of a small oversight in `PDFViewerApplication._initializeMetadata`, this *cached* `contentDispositionFilename` would be ignored and we'd only attempt to use the one returned by `PDFDocumentProxy.getMetadata` in the API (which in the cases outlined above will always be empty).
Also, to ensure that the document properties dialog always displays the *correct* fileName we'll now lookup it using the same exact method as in the viewer itself (via a new callback-function).
With the exception of `isThumbnailViewVisible`, these getters are completely unused. Generally speaking, using the `visibleView`-getter directly works just as well and seems (at least to me) to be overall preferable considering how our classes are usually implemented.
Currently, when non-standard `pageColors` are specified, the thumbnails will look inconsistent depending on how they're created.
The thumbnails that are created by downsizing the *page* canvases will obviously use the `pageColors` as intended, however the thumbnails which are rendered *directly* will always use the default colors.
Over time, as we've been introducing JavaScript code to modify CSS variables, we've been adding shorthand properties to various classes to reduce unnecessary repetition when accessing the document-styles.
Rather than repeating this in multiple places, it seems overall simpler to just introduce a constant and re-use that throughout the viewer instead.
After the changes in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1757771, that simplified the MOZCENTRAL downloading code, the `ChromeActions.download`-method will no longer invoke the `sendResponse`-callback.
Hence it should no longer be necessary for the `DownloadManager`, in the MOZCENTRAL viewer, to use `FirefoxCom.requestAsync` since no response is ever provided.[1] For the allocated BlobURLs, they should (hopefully) be released when navigating away from the viewer.
---
[1] Note that that was *already* the case, for one of the previous code-paths in the `ChromeActions.download`-method.
After the changes in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1757771, that simplified the MOZCENTRAL downloading code, the `sourceEventType` is now completely unused and should thus be removed (in my opinion).
Furthermore, with these changes, we also no longer need a *separate* internal "save"-event and can instead just use the older "download"-event everywhere.
The original `ProgressBar`-functionality is very old, and could thus do with some general clean-up.
In particular, while it currently accepts various options those have never really been used in either the default viewer or in any examples. The sort of "styling" that these options provided are *much better*, not to mention simpler, done directly with CSS rules.
As part of these changes, the "progress" is now updated using CSS variables rather than by directly modifying the `style` of DOM elements. This should hopefully simplify future changes to this code, see e.g. PR 14898.
Finally, this also fixes a couple of other small things in the "mobile viewer" example.
While zeroing the temporary `canvas` makes sense, manually clearing the canvas and its context doesn't really accomplish anything since those are tied to the scope of the method.
We need to wait for UI rendering to start *before* getting the CSS variable values, since otherwise the values will be `NaN`.
This is only an issue if the viewer is completely hidden during loading, e.g. in a `display: none` iframe-element.
*This patch can be tested, in the viewer, using the `annotation-fileattachment.pdf` document from the test-suite.*
It seems that the code to delay dispatching of the "attachmentsloaded"-event, when `attachmentsCount === 0`, is now effectively broken.[1]
Rather than only using an arbitrary timeout, the new code will instead wait for an "annotationlayerrendered"-event and only *fallback* to using a timeout.
---
[1] The timing of the annotationLayer-rendering changed slightly in PR 14247, and the old code in `PDFAttachmentViewer` wasn't good enough to handle that.
Given that the new API-option is an Object named `pageColors`, with `background`/`foreground` keys, it occurred to me that it'd be slightly more consistent if the options/preferences names fully reflected that.
An old shortcoming of the `preprocessCSS`-function is its complete lack of support for our "normal" defines, which makes it very difficult to have build-specific CSS rules. Recently we've started using specially crafted comments to remove CSS rules from the MOZCENTRAL build, but (ab)using the `preprocessCSS`-function in this way really doesn't feel great.
However, it turns out to be surprisingly simple to instead use the "regular" `preprocess`-function for the CSS files as well. The only special-handling that's still necessary is the helper-function for dealing with CSS-imports, but apart from that everything seems to just work.
One reason, as far as I can tell, for having a separate `preprocessCSS`-function was likely that we originally used *lots* of vendor-prefixed CSS rules in our CSS files. With improvements over the years, especially thanks to Autoprefixer and PostCSS, we've been able to remove *almost* all non-standard CSS rules and the need for special-casing the CSS parsing has mostly vanished.
*Please note:* As part of testing this patch I've diffed the output of `gulp generic`, `gulp mozcentral`, and `gulp chromium` against the `master`-branch to check that there was no obvious breakage.
These methods are completely unused in the Firefox PDF Viewer, and were only added to supplement the `PDFViewerApplication.{bindEvents, bindWindowEvents}`-methods since third-party implementations may apparently need to remove event listeners (see PR 8525).
However, in the MOZCENTRAL build that's just dead code and this patch reduces the size of the *built* `web/viewer.js`-file by `~3.5` kB.
*This patch can be tested, in the viewer, using the `annotation-fileattachment.pdf` document from the test-suite.*
Note how the `FileSpec`-implementation already uses `stringToPDFString` during the filename lookup, see cfac6fa511/src/core/file_spec.js (L70)
Hence there's no reason to repeat that again in the `FileAttachmentAnnotationElement`-constructor, and we can thus simplify the "fileattachmentannotation"-event handling a little bit.
This new CSS variable will allow us to simplify a couple of different viewer components, since we no longer need to use JavaScript-based hacks and can directly set the CSS rules instead. In particular:
- The `BaseViewer`-handling, used as part of the code that will center pages *vertically* in PresentationMode, can be simplified.
By using CSS to control the height of the "dummy"-page we avoid unnecessarily invalidating the scale-value, which can reduce *some* unneeded re-rendering while PresentationMode is active.
- The `SecondaryToolbar.#setMaxHeight`-method, and its associated parameters, are no longer necessary and can be completely removed.
Note that in order for things to work correctly in general, the new `--viewer-container-height` CSS variable must potentially be updated on any window-based "resize"-event (even when there's no zooming). While this is currently only done in the default viewer, that shouldn't be an issue since neither PresentationMode nor Toolbar-functionality is included in the "viewer components".
- Use Canvas & CanvasText color when they don't have their default value
as background and foreground colors.
- The colors used to draw (stroke/fill) in a pdf are replaced by the bg/fg
ones according to their luminance.
After recent changes, adding *basic* Spread mode support in PresentationMode has now become reasonably straightforward.
However, documents with *varying* page sizes are non-trivial to handle and would require re-writing (or at least re-factoring) a bunch of the zooming-code.
Hence this PR *purposely* only allow Spread modes to be used, in PresentationMode, for documents where all pages have exactly the same size. While this obviously isn't a fully complete solution, it will however cover the vast majority of all documents and should hopefully be deemed good enough for now.
In PR 14112 usage of this *internal* method was reduced, and it thus can't hurt to clean-up things a little bit more.
Note in particular that we can simplify the call-sites by directly passing in the already available `PDFPageView`-instance, since the `id`-property those contain can replace the previous `pageNumber`-parameter[1].
Given that the method name has always been prefixed with an underscore it was thus never intended to be "public", hence we can now enforce that with modern ECMAScript features.
---
[1] There's already a bunch of other spots, throughout the viewer-code, where we assume that the `PDFPageView.id`-property contains proper page *numbers* (and not e.g. indices); note how we initialize the `PDFPageView`-instances in the `BaseViewer.setDocument`-method.
Given that we're (ab)using spread-modes in order to ensure that pages are centered *vertically* in PresentationMode, this re-factoring simplifies the code slightly.
Furthermore, in the event that we *possibly* want to try and support spread-modes in PresentationMode[1] this re-factoring will also prevent future duplication.
---
[1] Note that I'm not particularly keen on doing that, since documents with varying page sizes will be annoying to handle.
There's no point in having these variables defined (implicitly) as `undefined` in e.g. the Firefox PDF Viewer.
By defining them with `var` and using ESList ignores, rather than `let`, we can move them into the relevant pre-processor block instead. Note that since the entire viewer-code is placed, by Webpack, in a top-level closure these variables will thus *not* become globally accessible.
Given that `webViewerOpenFileViaURL` only has a single call-site, and also isn't a particularly large/complex function, it doesn't seem necessary for this to be a separate function and hence it's simply inlined instead.
Also, changes the "no valid build-target was set"-case to throw unconditionally since the only way that it could ever be hit is if there are bugs in the `gulpfile`-code.
Currently we're using *both* ids and classes when specifying the button icons, which seems completely unnecessary and only serves to bloat the CSS code.
In general you always need to be careful about CSS specificity, but in these cases that should not actually be a problem.
Also, while not a button, this patch makes a similar simplification for the `pageNumber`-input.
Note how in the `viewer.html` file we're specifying class names for most buttons, despite that not really being necessary. First of all, in many cases those class names are *identical* to the element-ids. Secondly, looking through the CSS rules they are only ever used when specifying button icons.
All-in-all, we should be able to simplify the HTML-code and use the element-ids in the CSS rules instead. Obviously ids have a higher CSS specificity than classes, but given how the old classes were being used that shouldn't be a problem here.
Also, the patch generalizes the styling for buttons (e.g. `viewBookmark`) that are *actually* link-elements.
Finally, while slightly unrelated, this patch also removes a little bit of duplication when specifying the border for `toolbarField`s.
Searching through all of the files in the `web/`-folder has no *other* hits for the "textButton" string. Hence it's clear that there are no DOM elements actually using this class, and it's thus dead code.
This re-factors the various toolbar separators to *explicitly* specify both their dimensions and margins. Also, for the `horizontalToolbarSeparator`-class we can just set the `background-color` rather than using `border-top`.
Note that the `splitToolbarButtonSeparator`-class currently sets a number of unnecessary CSS rules, since as mentioned by the Firefox Devtools both the `display`- and `z-index`-properties are being ignored because `float` is used.
Finally, there's also no need to set a `z-index` for some of the `:hover`-rules. It's possible that this *was* necessary before the re-design, since the buttons had borders then.
Note how both of the openFile-buttons are always hidden during viewer initialization in the MOZCENTRAL build, i.e. the *built-in* Firefox PDF Viewer. Despite that we still include HTML, CSS, and JavaScript code for these buttons in the build.
This patch *reduces* the size of the `gulp mozcentral` output by `1679` bytes, which isn't a lot but still cannot hurt.
These rules became unnecessary with PR 7697, over five years ago, since printing is now done from a `printContainer`-element rather than "directly" using the viewer.
Note how the *entire* `outerContainer`, which contains all of the DOM elements that were being manually hidden, is now being hidden during printing. Furthermore, note also how the print-canvases/images and their containers are using custom CSS-classes[1] rather than re-using the ones from the viewer.
---
[1] See the `printedPage` respectively `xfaPrintedPage` classes.
Rather than modifying the leading/trailing `margin` on the actual toolbar buttons, to achieve appropriate spacing at the left/right edges of the toolbar(s), it seems much more appropriate (and simpler) to just specify an explicit `padding` for the relevant toolbar containers.
Also, for toolbar buttons placed in `splitToolbarButton`-classes we can reduce some complexity around setting the `margin` (since it should always be zero now).
With these changes, we're thus able to get rid of a couple more `!important`-rules.
- Remove a redundant `margin-top` rule for the `.dropdownToolbarButton`. After the (somewhat) recent UI-refresh all buttons now use `margin: 2px 1px;`, which renders the override unnecessary (and getting rid of an `!important`-rule can't hurt).
- Combine two `.toggled::before` rules, since they're identical.
Note that both the `errorWrapper` HTML and JavaScript code is being ignored in the MOZCENTRAL build, i.e. the *built-in* Firefox PDF Viewer, however the CSS rules are still being included.
That seems totally unnecessary, and while we currently don't have full build-target support in the CSS pre-processor we can actually improve things quite easily anyway. By (ab)using the existing CSS pre-processor, which will remove any non-Firefox CSS rules for the MOZCENTRAL build, it's possible to easily stop bundling any CSS rules by using comments that include a `-webkit`-string.
*Please note:* To easily test that this doesn't break the `errorWrapper` in GENERIC builds, try running e.g. `PDFViewerApplication._otherError("test");` in the web-console.
This special-case was added because the original PresentationMode-implementation used some CSS-tricks to hide everything except the current page. With the changes in PR 14112, which added a PAGE scroll-mode, many of the old PresentationMode-specific hacks could thus be removed from both the JS and CSS code.
This patch is yet another (small) clean-up step, to reduce the number of PresentationMode special-cases used throughout the `BaseViewer`. Note in particular that `BaseViewer.update` now works just fine in PresentationMode[1], and that we only need to ensure that the active page won't *accidentally* change because of the PresentationMode-specific zooming that occurs during page-switching.
---
[1] In the event that we ever want to try and support spread-modes in PresentationMode, which I'm really not keen on doing since documents with varying page sizes will be annoying to handle, these changes would be necessary as well.
The styling of the previous/next-buttons and the findInput, with the elements being "glued" together, was supposed to mimic the styling used in the Firefox *browser* findbar. However, after the most recent re-styling of the Firefox browser UI these elements are now visually separated.
Hence it makes sense, as far as I'm concerned, to try and follow this styling for the findbar used in the GENERIC viewer. One benefit of doing this is that we get more consistent styling, since the buttons now look/behave identically in both the main toolbar and the findbar. Additionally this also simplifies the CSS a bit, since a lot of the existing findbar-specific rules can be removed.
The spread-mode code in `BaseViewer.#ensurePageViewVisible`-method was initially copied from the `BaseViewer._updateSpreadMode`-method, which means that it's slightly more complicated than actually necessary.
In particular, in the PAGE scroll-mode there can only be *one* spread active at a time and we thus don't need to handle insertion of multiple spread-divs.
Given that no HTML element has used the `loadingBox`-id for many years, we obviously don't need to try and hide a non-existent element during printing.
Furthermore, we also shouldn't need to change the `overflow`-value for the `viewerContainer`-element during printing. Originally, many years ago now, we printed "directly" using the viewer and then this apparently made sense.
Given that none of these CSS rules are used at all, unless debugging is enabled, it seems completely unnecessary to load them *unconditionally* for all users.[1]
Note that if *both* the `textLayer` and `pdfBug` debugging hash-parameters are specified simultaneously, we'll now load the `PDFBug`-file *twice* (since the code is simpler that way). However, given first of all that none of this is enabled by default and secondly that using those parameters together isn't helpful[2], potentially loading that file twice is hopefully not an issue.
For the `gulp mozcentral` target, the size of the *built* `viewer.css` file is reduced `> 3%` with this patch.
---
[1] For the Firefox built-in PDF Viewer, in order to even be able to access the `PDFBug` functionality, you need to first of all set `pdfjs.pdfBugEnabled = true` manually in `about:config`. Secondly, you then also need to append the `pdfBug=...` hash-parameter to the URL when *initially* loading the document.
[2] Note how the `textLayer`-settings are already, since essentially forever, overriding the highlighting-features of the "FontInspector"-tab.
This CSS variable is only used together with the `annotationCanvasMap`-functionality in the canvas-code, however its value can be *trivially* computed by using the older `--zoom-factor` CSS variable together with the `PixelsPerInch`-structure.
Rather than having *two different* CSS variables that are this closely linked, it seems better to simplify things by using just one CSS variable instead.
According to the CSS, there should be a visible "divider" after the "Page Width" zoom-option. However, this is being ignored in both Mozilla Firefox[1] and Google Chrome hence the rule is effectively useless now.
Furthermore, the "custom" zoom-option is already being `hidden` using the attribute (in the HTML code) and there should thus be no reason to duplicate this in the CSS as well.
---
[1] Support for *detailed* styling of `<select>`-elements was removed as part of the E10s project.
With just a couple of exceptions, for the `thumbnailView`, all of the sidebarViews share the same basic styling which thus allows for some simplification.
- For the findbar/secondaryToolbar case, the `min-width` rule doesn't really make sense since it's way too small to be useful. Furthermore, the findbar is already specifying its own `min-width` and the secondaryToolbar will (thanks to its buttons) receive a correct/useful width.
- The pageNumber-input already has an *explicit* `width` set, hence setting the `min-width` rule as well is completely unnecessary.
- The treeItem-links are supposed to *compute* their `min-width`, and the static value was only added as a fallback for older browsers without `calc()` support.
In a couple of spots, mostly related to the debugging tools, we're unnecessarily using a somewhat "complex" `background`-format only to specify a solid color. This can be simplified by using `background-color` instead, and the patch also removes a `color`-rule that's being ignored anyway.
After the changes in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1761839, we no longer need this CSS work-around to prevent the entire `<dialog>` contents from becoming selected when the backdrop is clicked.
When the viewer becomes narrow enough that the sidebar is overlaying the document, which means that the `viewerContainer` is not moving when opening/closing the sidebar, we're currently not removing the `sidebarMoving` CSS class as intended.
While this doesn't cause any *visible* issues, it's nonetheless wrong and should be fixed.
With the changes in PR 8993, a number of the `@media`-related CSS rules became unnecessary. However, it appears that some of these rule were *accidentally* left behind despite being unused now.
Note that previously, when opening the sidebar shifted the position of the main toolbar, we had to take both the sidebar opened *and* closed cases into account in these `@media` rules.
*This is yet another installment in a never-ending series of patches that attempt to simplify and improve old code.*
The `fileInput`-element is used to support the "Open file"-button in the `GENERIC` viewer, however this is very old code.
Rather than creating the element dynamically in JavaScript, we can simply define it conditionally in the HTML code thanks to the pre-processor. Furthermore, the `fileInput`-element currently has a number of unnecessary CSS rules, since the element is *purposely* never made visibly.
Note that with these changes, the `fileInput`-element will now *always* have `display: none;` set. This shouldn't matter, since we can still trigger the `click`-event of the element just fine (via JavaScript) and this patch has been successfully tested in both Mozilla Firefox and Google Chrome.
With the changes in the previous patch, we can simplify the state-tracking by using the `PresentationModeState`-values directly in the `PDFPresentationMode` class.
The `pdfOpenParams` parameter has never really made sense in PresentationMode, since e.g. the zoom-value doesn't (generally) agree with the value chosen by the user prior to entering PresentationMode.
This has never mattered all that much, since the `viewBookmark`-button isn't visible in PresentationMode (nor is any other toolbar button for that matter). However, in the `PDFHistory`-implementation we're currently forced to handle this case specifically since we don't want to populate the browser history with nonsensical state.
Hence it makes overall sense, as far as I'm concerned, to tweak the "updateviewarea" event to include a *simplified* `pdfOpenParams` parameter when PresentationMode is active. Given that the `viewer components` don't include PresentationMode functionality, this change thus shouldn't matter for third-party users.
This method was originally added specifically to work-around bugs/issues related to PresentationMode in Google Chrome. Note that prior to PR 14112 we were using some CSS hacks to only show the current page in PresentationMode, and that could lead to the `getVisibleElements` function not always finding the correct elements.
However, after the changes in PR 14112 we're now using the Page-scrolling mode in PresentationMode and consequently there'll only be *a single* page visible at a time. Hence then `BaseViewer._getCurrentVisiblePage` helper method should no longer be needed, and when testing (locally) in Google Chrome everything seems to work correctly now.
The various functionality in `web/debugger.js` is currently *indirectly* added to the global scope, since that's how `var` works when it's used outside of any functions/closures.
Given how this functionality is being accessed/used, not just in the viewer but also in the API and textLayer, simply converting the entire file to a module isn't trivial[1]. However, we can at least export the `PDFBug`-part properly and then `import` that dynamically in the viewer.
Also, to improve the code a little bit, we're now *explicitly* exporting the necessary functionality globally.
According to MDN, see https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Statements/import#browser_compatibility, all the browsers that we now support have dynamic `imports` implementations.
---
[1] We could probably pass around references to the necessary functionality, but given how this is being used I'm just not sure it's worth the effort. Also, adding *official* support for these viewer-specific debugging tools in the API feels both unnecessary and unfortunate.
Please note that this patch is purposely quite basic, e.g. it doesn't add the polyfill-CSS in order to simplify the build process, and things such as `::backdrop` thus isn't working.
However, this patch does ensure that older browsers can at least still *access* all of the previous overlays and that things like e.g. opening of password-protected documents respectively printing still works.
This will hopefully improve the a11y a little bit in these dialogs, however there's most definately more things that can be done here (by someone more knowledgeable about a11y).
This way we're able to store the `<dialog>` elements directly, which removes the need to use manually specified name-strings thus simplifying both the `OverlayManager` itself and its calling code.
This replaces our *custom* overlays with standard `<dialog>` DOM elements, see https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/dialog, thus simplifying the related CSS, HTML, and JavaScript code.
With these changes, some of the functionality of the `OverlayManager` class is now handled natively (e.g. `Esc` to close the dialog). However, since we still need to be able to prevent dialogs from overlaying one another, it still makes sense to keep this functionality (as far as I'm concerned).
PDFScriptingManager uses the `mousedown` and `mouseup` listeners to keep
track of whether the mouse pointer is pressed in the `isDown` flag.
These listeners were registered to run during the bubbling phase of the
event dispatch, which can be interrupted if any of the previous event
listeners stopped the event propagation. An example of that is by
`GrabToPan` in web/grab_to_pan.js.
Since the mousedown (and mouseup) listeners of PDFScriptingManager are
free of side effects, and the intention is to always run them, it makes
most sense to register them with the capture flag.
After the recent round of patches, I figured that we'd gone as far as possible in replacing `dir`-dependent CSS rules for the viewer.
However, it occurred that me that we could actually use a bit of CSS-trickery to get rid of the remaining ones. More specifically, this was done by defining a CSS variable whose value depends on the document direction and then using that variable together with `calc()` in the affected rules.
*Please note:* I suppose that this could perhaps be seen as a bit too "magical", hence I understand if this patch is ultimately rejected, however this is probably the only simple way to get rid of the remaining `dir`-dependent CSS rules.
The old code would allow an overlay to force close *itself*, before immediately re-opening itself, which actually isn't very helpful in practice since that won't re-run any overlay-specific initialization code.
Given how the overlays are being used this really shouldn't have caused any issues, but it's a bug that we should fix nonetheless.
*Please note:* This is another step in what will, time permitting, become a series of patches to simplify/modernize the viewer CSS.
Rather than having to manually specify ltr/rtl-specific float-values in the CSS, we can use logical `inline-start`/`inline-end` instead (and similar for some related left/right occurrences).
These logical properties depend on, among other things, the direction of the HTML document which we *always* specify in the viewer.
Given that most of these logical CSS properties are fairly new, and that cross-browser support is thus somewhat limited (see below), we rely on PostCSS plugins in order to support this in the GENERIC viewer.
- https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/float#browser_compatibility
- https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/inset-inline-end#browser_compatibility
Currently we're resolving the Promises in the `_extractTextPromises` Array with the page-index, despite that not really being necessary since the Promises in the Array are explicitly inserted in the correct order.
Furthermore, we can replace the standard `for`-loop with a `for...of`-loop which results in ever so slightly more compact code.
Given that none of these methods were ever intended to be accessed directly from the outside, we can use modern ECMAScript features to ensure that they are indeed private.
This patch also makes `fieldData` private, to remove the old hack used to prevent it from being modified from the outside.
Given that we're now *building* the `web/viewer.css` file used in the development viewer, i.e. with `gulp server`, we no longer need to hard-code these `-webkit`-prefixed rules and can instead let Autoprefixer handle that for us.
To allow using modern CSS features that currently only Mozilla Firefox supports[1], while still enabling development/testing in recent Google Chrome versions, we'll have to start building the `web/viewer.css` file with `gulp server` as well.
In my testing, building the development CSS (and copying the images) takes *less than* `200 ms` on average which is hopefully an acceptable overhead for this sort of feature.
---
[1] In particular `float`, with `inline-start`/`inline-end` values.
This patch fixes an old inconsistency, when using `BasePreferences.{reset, set}`, where the internal Preference values would be kept even if writing them to storage failed.
Given that none of these fields were ever intended to be accessed directly from the *outside*, since that will lead to inconsistent/broken state, we can use modern ECMAScript features to ensure that they are indeed private.
*Please note:* I don't really know anything about a11y, hence it's possible that this patch either doesn't work correctly or at least isn't a complete solution.
In both the SecondaryToolbar and the Sidebar we have "button groups" that functionally acts essentially like radio-buttons. Based on skimming through [this MDN article](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Accessibility/ARIA/Roles/radio_role) it thus appears that we should tag them as such, using `role="radiogroup"` and `role="radio"`, and then utilize the `aria-checked` attribute to indicate to a11y software which button is currently active.
Unfortunately simply using `appearance: textfield;`, or even `-webkit-appearance: textfield;`, doesn't actually hide the "spinner" in number-input elements in e.g. Google Chrome.
Hence we need to use a work-around with the `-webkit-inner-spin-button` rule, however in our CSS code we also have `-webkit-outer-spin-button` currently. According to both [the MDN compatibility data](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/::-webkit-outer-spin-button#browser_compatibility) and also manual testing in Google Chrome Beta 99, the `-webkit-outer-spin-button` rule is no longer necessary and we can thus clean-up the CSS a tiny bit.
