This fixes only those warnings, as reported by https://lgtm.com/projects/g/mozilla/pdf.js?mode=list, that make sense (as far as I'm concerned).
Hence this patch leaves the following things unaddressed:
- The "recommendation"-category, since it only complains about unused variables. However, note that all of those cases are purposely included and that there's thus ESLint-disable comments added to explictly allow them.
- The "warning"-category, which still contains two complaints. However, as far as I can tell, they are both false positives.
Given first of all the false positives of the LGTM static analyzer, and secondly that we'd need to add (essentially duplicated) disable-comments for the unused variable cases, it's not entirely clear to me if we actually want to work towards including LGTM in the PDF.js project (e.g. running alongside Travis) or if we should just close issue 11965.
Given that the `Map`-pattern apparently has undesirable performance characteristics, change this getter back to using an Object instead and check its size before returning it.
Rather than returning an *empty* Object[1] we should be returning `null` instead, since that's consistent with existing API-functionality.
To avoid having to *manually* track if the Object is empty, this patch also introduces a small helper function to check its size.
As can be seen in `src/core/fonts.js`, this method only accepts *one* parameter, hence it's somewhat difficult to understand what the Annotation-code is actually attempting to do here.
The only possible explanation that I can imagine, is that the intention was initially to call `Font.charToGlyph` *directly* instead. However, note that that'd would not actually have been correct, since that'd ignore one level of font-caching (see `this.charsCache`). Hence the unused arguments are removed, in `src/core/annotation.js`, and the `Font.charToGlyph` method is now marked as "private" as intended.
This patch removes unnecessary escape-sequence in (mostly) strings, as a first step, since the ones in regular expressions probably requires more careful testing (just in case).
The only exception is a regular expression in `src/core/annotation.js`, since we should have both unit- and reference-tests for this code *and* given [this information on MDN](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Guide/Regular_Expressions/Character_Classes#Types):
> Inside a character set, the dot loses its special meaning and matches a literal dot.
Please find additional details about the ESLint rule at https://eslint.org/docs/rules/no-useless-escape
Given that `Object.fromEntries` doesn't seem to *guarantee* that a `null` prototype is used, we thus hack around that by using `Object.assign` with `Object.create(null)`.
This provides a work-around to avoid having to conditionally try to initialize the `openAction`-object in multiple places.
Given that `Object.fromEntries` doesn't seem to *guarantee* that a `null` prototype is used, we thus hack around that by using `Object.assign` with `Object.create(null)`.
This probably ought to have been included in PR 12534, but better late than never I suppose, since it helps to more clearly demonstrate the bug in a way that a reference-test alone just cannot do.
When writing this unit-test I also noticed that it required a certain amount of "luck" to actually trigger the bug, prior to the patch, since it seems that the bug only reproduced for certain *unfortunate* sequences of TypedArray data. (The added unit-test contains one such, purposely simple, example.)
Given that we're now accessing certain API-functionality *directly* in this file, e.g. the AnnotationStorage and Optional Content configuration, ensuring that there's not a version mismatch definitely seem like a good idea to prevent any *subtle* future bugs.
The unit-test files themselves shouldn't be loaded until Jasmine has been setup/configured, however that doesn't matter for the "normal" PDF.js library files. Hence we can simply `import` them in the standard way.
This patch first of all enables linting of the files in the `test/font/` folder, and secondly it also re-factors all test files to use native `import`/`export` statements. Finally, all tests are now loaded correctly, rather than being included as scripts through the `font_test.html` file.
Different fonts incorrectly end up with *identical* hashes, despite having different /ToUnicode data.
The issue, and it's very interesting that we've apparently not seen it before, appears to be caused by the fact that different /ToUnicode entries share the *same* underlying `ArrayBuffer`, which thus becomes problematic at the `const dataUint32 = new Uint32Array(data.buffer, 0, blockCounts);` line. The simplest solution thus seem to be to just *copy* the input, when it's an `ArrayBuffer`, rather than using it as-is. (Note that if we'd stringified the input, when calling `MurmurHash3_64.update`, the issue would also have been fixed. In this case, we're already creating an unique TypedArray.)
Given that this code is used on the worker-thread, where SystemJS is still used during development, we need to (for now) handle this folder the same way as the `src/core/` one.
Since we no longer use SystemJS to load the unit-tests, there's now nothing that prevents us from using optional chaining and nullish coalescing in the `src/display/` directory.
*Please note:* Once https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1247687 is implemented, and we've removed SystemJS completely, this entire patch can (and even should) be reverted.
This is similar to the existing `getLookupTableFactory` helper function, but is implemented as outlined in issue 6774.
The re-formatting of the tables were done automatically, by using find-and-replace with regular expressions.
For reasons that I don't even pretend to understand, using this particular structure for these *very* long lookup tables allow SystemJS to process the files correctly/quickly and the development viewer thus works as intended.
While the *built* `pdf.worker.js` file still works correctly with these changes, despite these two files being excluded by Babel[1], the development viewer does not because of issues with SystemJS[2] and/or its Babel-plugin (both of which are old).
Furthermore, note also that excluding these two files from Babel-processing isn't *generally* necessary since e.g. the `gulp mozcentral` command works anyway. The explanation is rather that it's actually the source-map generation which fails for these huge sequences when building the `pdf.worker.js` file.
However, not using standard `import`/`export` statements in all files means we also need to use SystemJS when e.e. running the unit-tests. This is very unfortunate, since SystemJS (or its old Babel-version) doesn't support modern ECMAScript features such as e.g. optional chaining and nullish coalescing.
Unfortunately it also seems that https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1247687, which tracks the implementation of worker-modules in Firefox, has stalled since there hasn't been any updates for six months now.
To hopefully address all of the above, this patch is the first in a series that attempts to further reduce our reliance on SystemJS.
---
[1] The only difference being how the dependencies are handled, in the Webpack-bundled file.
[2] Parsing takes way too long and consumes too much memory, thus rendering the development viewer essentially unusable.
This brings the new `pdf.scripting.js` bundling more in-line with the pre-existing handling for the `pdf.js`/`pdf.worker.js` files:
- Add a new `src/pdf.scripting.js` file as the entry-point for the build scripts.
- Add the version/build numbers at the top of the *built* `pdf.scripting.js` files, since all other built files include that information given that it's often helpful to be able to easily determine the *exact* version.
- Tweak the `createScriptingBundle` in the gulp-file, since it looks like a little bit too much copy-and-paste in the variable names.
This mainly involves the `crypto_spec.js` file which declared most
variables before their usage, which is not really consistent with the
rest of the codebase. This also required reformatting some long arrays
in that file because otherwise we would exceed the 80 character line
limit. Overall, this makes the code more readable.
