Given that we already have a `PresentationModeState`-enumeration, we should use that with the "presentationmodechanged" event rather than including separate properties. Note that this new behaviour, of including an enumeration-value in the event, is consistent with lots of other existing viewer-events.
To hopefully avoid issues in custom implementations of the default viewer, any attempt to access the removed properties will now throw.
Similar to e.g. the "locale" option, this in *only* done for those build-targets where the "sandboxBundleSrc" is actually defined.
With these changes we can remove an `AppOptions` dependency from the `web/generic_scripting.js` file, thus limiting *direct* `AppOptions` usage in the default viewer files.
Given that the `dispatchEventInSandbox` method (on the scripting-classes) is asynchronous, there's a very real risk that the events won't be dispatched/handled until *after* their associated functionality has actually run (with the "Will..." events being particularily susceptible to this issue).
To reduce the likelihood of that happening, we can simply `await` the `dispatchEventInSandbox` calls as necessary. A couple of methods are now marked as `async` to support these changes, however that shouldn't be a problem as far as I can tell.
*Please note:* Given that the browser "beforeprint"/"afterprint" events are *synchronous*, we unfortunately cannot await the `WillPrint`/`DidPrint` event dispatching. To fix this properly the web-platform would need support for asynchronous printing, and we'll thus have to hope that things work correctly anyway.
Note that currently the `DidSave` event is not *guaranteed* to actually be dispatched if there's any errors during saving, which is easily fixed by simply moving it to occur in the `finally`-handler in `PDFViewerApplication.save` method.
For the `WillPrint`/`DidPrint` events, things are unfortunately more complicated. Currently these events will *only* be dispatched iff the printing request comes from within the viewer itself (e.g. by the user clicking on the "Print" toolbar button), however printing can be triggered in a few additional ways:
- In the GENERIC viewer:
- By the <kbd>Ctrl</kbd>+<kbd>P</kbd> keyboard shortcut.
- In the MOZCENTRAL viewer, i.e. the Firefox built-in viewer:
- By the <kbd>Ctrl</kbd>+<kbd>P</kbd> keyboard shortcut.
- By the "Print" item, as found in either the Firefox "Hamburger menu" or in the browser-window menu.
In either of the cases described above, no `WillPrint`/`DidPrint` events will be dispatched. In order to *guarantee* that things work in the general case, we thus have to move the `dispatchEventInSandbox` calls to the "beforeprint"/"afterprint" event handlers instead.
Rather than calling `getJavaScript` in the API and then ignoring the result, when "enableScripting" is set, it should be more efficient/faster to simply skip it altogether instead.
Finally, the `setTimeout` call at the end of `PDFViewerApplication._initializeAutoPrint` is removed, since it doesn't seem necessary any more as far as I can tell.[1]
Note that when this functionality was originally added, back in PR 2839, it seems that `pagesPromise` simply waited for the `getPage` calls of *all* pages to resolve. Today, on the other hand, the viewer fetches *and* renders the first page *before* doing the remaining `getPage` calls, and only afterwards is `pagesPromise` resolved. Hence it's not really clear why we now need to delay printing even further with a `setTimeout` call.
---
[1] The patch was tested with the following documents: https://github.com/mozilla/pdf.js/blob/master/test/pdfs/bug1001080.pdf and https://github.com/mozilla/pdf.js/blob/master/test/pdfs/issue6106.pdf
These callbacks should not be necessary *before* the document has been initialized. Furthermore, move the functionality to a new helper-method since `PDFViewerApplication.load` is already quite large.
Given that this relies on accessing properties on the `PDFDocumentProxy`-instance, it seems more appropriate for this code to live in `PDFViewerApplication`.
It seems that the timeout is way too short in practice, since this new integration-test failed *intermittently* already in PR 12702 (which is where the test was added).
The ideal solution here would be to simply await an event, dispatched by the viewer, however that unfortunately doesn't appear to be supported by Puppeteer.
Instead, the solution implemented here is to add a new method in `PDFViewerApplication` which Puppeteer can query to check if the scripting/sandbox has been fully initialized.
There's really no point, as far as I can tell, to attempt to dispatch an event in a non-existent sandbox. Generally speaking, even trying to do this *could* possibly even lead to errors in some cases.
Furthermore, utilize optional chaining to simplify some `dispatchEventInSandbox` calls throughout the viewer.
Finally, replace superfluous `return` statements with `break` in the switch-statement in the `updateFromSandbox` event-handler.
There's no really compelling reason, as far as I can tell, to introduce the `ENABLE_SCRIPTING` build-target, instead of simply re-using the existing `TESTING` build-target for the new `gulp integrationtest` task.
In general there should be no problem with just always enable scripting in TESTING-builds, and if I were to *guess* the reason that this didn't seem to work was most likely because the Preferences ended up over-writing the `AppOptions`.
As it turns out the GENERIC-viewer has already has built-in support for disabling of Preferences, via the `AppOptions`, and this can be utilized in TESTING-builds as well to ensure that whatever `AppOptions` are set they're always respected.
For DOM events all event names are lower-case, and the newly added PDF.js scripting-events thus "stick out" quite a bit. Even more so, considering that our internal `eventBus`-events follow the same naming convention.
Hence this patch, which changes the "updateFromSandbox"/"dispatchEventInSandbox" events to be lower-case instead.
Furthermore, using DOM events for communication *within* the PDF.js code itself (i.e. between code in `web/app.js` and `src/display/annotation_layer.js/`) feels *really* out of place.
That's exactly the reason that we have the `EventBus` abstraction, since it allowed us to remove prior use of DOM events, and this patch thus re-factors the code to make use of the `EventBus` instead for scripting-related events.
Obviously for events targeting a *specific element* using DOM events is still fine, but the "updatefromsandbox"/"dispatcheventinsandbox" ones should be using the `EventBus` internally.
*Drive-by change:* Use the `BaseViewer.currentScaleValue` setter unconditionally in `PDFViewerApplication._initializeJavaScript`, since it accepts either a string or a number.
- Actually remove the `isDown` property when destroying the scripting-instance.
- Mark all `mouseState` usage as "private" in the various classes.
- Ensure that the `AnnotationLayer` actually treats the parameter as properly *optional*, the same way that the viewer components do.
- For now remove the `mouseState` parameter from the `PDFPageView` class, and keep it only on the `BaseViewer`, since it's questionable if all of the scripting-functionality will work all that well without e.g. a full `BaseViewer`.
- Append the `mouseState` to the JSDoc for the `AnnotationElement` class, and just move its definition into the base-`AnnotationElement` class.
* the goal is to execute actions like Open or OpenAction
* can be tested with issue6106.pdf (auto-print)
* once #12701 is merged, we can add page actions
This new event essentially mirrors the existing "pagesinit" event, and will allow e.g. a custom implementation of the viewer to be notified before the current PDF document is removed from the viewer.
By using this new event, we're thus able to dispatch a "pageclose" event for JavaScript actions when closing the existing document.
Having looked at the Acrobat JavaScript specification, see https://www.adobe.com/content/dam/acom/en/devnet/acrobat/pdfs/AcrobatDC_js_api_reference.pdf#G5.1963437, I suppose that introducing these two new events is probably the easiest solution overall.
However there's a number of things that, as far as I'm concerned, will help the overall implementation:
- Only dispatch these new events when `enableScripting = true` is set.
- Handle them *separately* from the existing "pagechanging" event dispatching, to avoid too much clutter.
- Don't dispatch either of the events if the page didn't actually change.
- When waiting for pages to render, don't dispatch "pageopen" if the page is no longer active when rendering finishes.
- Ensure that we only use *one* "pagerendered" event listener.
- Ensure that "pageopen" is actually dispatched when the document loads.
I suppose that we *could* avoid adding the "pageclose" event, and use the existing "pagechanging" event instead, however having a separate event might allow more flexibility in the future. (E.g. I don't know if we'll possibly want to dispatch "pageclose" on document close, as mentioned briefly in the specification.)
* move set/clear|Timeout/Interval and crackURL code in pdf.js
* remove the "backdoor" in the proxy (used to dispatch event) and so return the dispatch function in the initializer
* remove listeners if an error occured during sandbox initialization
* add support for alert and prompt in the sandbox
* add a function to eval in the global scope
Given that the GENERIC default viewer supports opening more than one document, and that a unique scripting-instance is now used for each document, the changes made in this patch seem appropriate.
While it's not entirely clear to me that it's ultimately desirable to use the `pdf.sandbox.js` in the Chromium-extension, given that the MOZCENTRAL-build uses `pdf.scripting.js` directly in a *custom* sandbox, the current state isn't that great since setting `enableScripting = true` with the Chromium-extension will currently fail completely.
Hence this patch, which should at least unbreak things for now.
Since the `close` method has become quite large, this small re-factoring shouldn't hurt (and may also be useful with future changes to the `_initializeJavaScript` method).
I completely missed this previously, but we obviously should remove the scriptElement as well to *really* clean-up everything properly.
Given that there's multiple existing usages of `loadScript` in the code-base, the safest/quickest solution seemed to be to have call-sites opt-in to remove the scriptElement using a new parameter.
This patch *attempts* to actually implement what's described for the `Count`-entry in the PDF specification, see https://www.adobe.com/content/dam/acom/en/devnet/acrobat/pdfs/PDF32000_2008.pdf#G11.2095911, which I mostly ignored back in PR 10890 since it seemed unnecessarily complicated[1].
Besides issue 12704, I've also tested a couple of other documents (e.g. the PDF specification) and these changes don't *seem* to break anything else; additional testing would be helpful though!
---
[1] At the time, all PDF documents that I tested worked even with a very simple approach and I thus hoped that it'd would suffice.
Similar to the previous patch, the GENERIC default viewer is capable of opening more than *one* PDF document and we should ensure that we handle that case correctly.
I was actually quite surprised to find that, despite the various `scripting`-getters implementing `destroySandbox` methods, there were no attempts at actually cleaning-up either the "sandbox" or removing the globally registered event listeners.
This patch also changes the method to skip *all* data fetching when "enableScripting" isn't active. Finally, simplifies some event-data accesses in the "updateFromSandbox" listener.
Another possible option here could be to use the `contentLength`, when it exists, and then using e.g. a custom event to always update the "filesize" in the sandbox "after the fact" with the result of the `getDownloadInfo`-call.
We can easily avoid unnecessary API-calls here, since most of the time the `metadata` will already be available here. In the *rare* case that it's not available, we can simply wait for the existing `getMetadata`-call to resolve.
This will be useful in the following patch, and note that there's also an old issue (see 5765) which asked for such an event. However, given that the use-case wasn't *clearly* specified, and that we didn't have an internal use for it at the time it wasn't implemented.
Also, ensure that all of the metadata-related properties are actually reset when the document is closed.
Compared to the, previously removed, `sandbox`/`watch-sandbox` gulp-tasks, these ones should work even when run against an non-existent/empty `build`-folder.
Also, to ensure that the development viewer actually works out-of-the-box, `gulp server` will now also include `gulp watch-dev-sandbox` to remove the need to *manually* invoke the build-tasks.
Finally, this patch also removes the `web/devcom.js` file since it shouldn't actually be needed, assuming that the "sandbox"-loading code in the `web/genericcom.js` file is actually *correctly* implemented.
Rather than having two slightly different ways of setting the pending/notFound appearance on the "findInput", we can simply use "data-status" in both cases since they're obviously mutually exclusive.
As mentioned in https://github.com/mozilla/pdf.js/wiki/Frequently-Asked-Questions#faq-support, PDF.js version `2.6.347` is the last release with IE 11/Edge support.
Hence we should now be able to reduce unnecessary duplication in the default viewer image resources, note the files in the `web/images/` folder with a `-dark` suffix, by using only *one* SVG-image for each icon and letting the `background-color` depend on the CSS theme instead.
For the `gulp mozcentral` build-target, the resulting `web/images/` folder is reduced from `43 997` to `28 566` bytes (~35 percent).
*Please note:* I don't really know if this implementation is necessarily the *best* solution, but it seems to work well enough in e.g. Firefox Nightly and Google Chrome Beta as far as my testing goes.
Given that we already include the "Content-Disposition"-header filename, when it exists, it shouldn't hurt to also include the information from the "Content-Length"-header.
For PDF documents opened via a URL, which should be a very common way for the PDF.js library to be used, this will[1] thus provide a way of getting the PDF filesize without having to wait for the `getDownloadInfo`-promise to resolve[2].
With these API improvements, we can also simplify the filesize handling in the `PDFDocumentProperties` class.
---
[1] Assuming that the server is correctly configured, of course.
[2] Since that's not *guaranteed* to happen in general, with e.g. `disableAutoFetch = true` set.
* quickjs-eval.js has been generated using https://github.com/mozilla/pdf.js.quickjs/
* lazy load of sandbox code
* Rewrite tests to use the sandbox
* Add a task `watch-sandbox` which update bundle pdf.sandbox.js on change in the sandbox code
