After PR 9566, which removed all of the old Firefox extension code, the `FIREFOX` build flag is no longer used for anything.
It thus seems to me that it should be removed, for a couple of reasons:
- It's simply dead code now, which only serves to add confusion when looking at the `PDFJSDev` calls.
- It used to be that `MOZCENTRAL` and `FIREFOX` was *almost* always used together. However, ever since PR 9566 there's obviously been no effort put into keeping the `FIREFOX` build flags up to date.
- In the event that a new, Webextension based, Firefox addon is created in the future you'd still need to audit all `MOZCENTRAL` (and possibly `CHROME`) build flags to see what'd make sense for the addon.
In order to eventually get rid of SystemJS and start using native `import`s instead, we'll need to provide "complete" file identifiers since otherwise there'll be MIME type errors when attempting to use `import`.
Please find additional details about the ESLint rule at https://eslint.org/docs/rules/prefer-const
Note that this patch is generated automatically, by using the ESLint `--fix` argument, and will thus require some additional clean-up (which is done separately).
Note that Prettier, purposely, has only limited [configuration options](https://prettier.io/docs/en/options.html). The configuration file is based on [the one in `mozilla central`](https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/source/.prettierrc) with just a few additions (to avoid future breakage if the defaults ever changes).
Prettier is being used for a couple of reasons:
- To be consistent with `mozilla-central`, where Prettier is already in use across the tree.
- To ensure a *consistent* coding style everywhere, which is automatically enforced during linting (since Prettier is used as an ESLint plugin). This thus ends "all" formatting disussions once and for all, removing the need for review comments on most stylistic matters.
Many ESLint options are now redundant, and I've tried my best to remove all the now unnecessary options (but I may have missed some).
Note also that since Prettier considers the `printWidth` option as a guide, rather than a hard rule, this patch resorts to a small hack in the ESLint config to ensure that *comments* won't become too long.
*Please note:* This patch is generated automatically, by appending the `--fix` argument to the ESLint call used in the `gulp lint` task. It will thus require some additional clean-up, which will be done in a *separate* commit.
(On a more personal note, I'll readily admit that some of the changes Prettier makes are *extremely* ugly. However, in the name of consistency we'll probably have to live with that.)
The `viewer` option was *only* used for checking that a document is loaded in `PDFPresentationMode.request`, however that's just as easy to do by simply utilizing `BaseViewer.pagesCount` instead and this way we can also avoid the DOM lookup.
Note that these files were among the first to be converted to ES6 classes, so it probably makes sense to do another pass to bring them inline with the most recent ES6 conversions.
The click handler used in Presentation Mode didn't check if the first/last page was already reached, which after PR 7529 now causes an unnecessary console error.
Hence we should simply use the already existing `_goToPreviousPage`/`_goToNextPage` methods instead, since they do the necessary bounds checking.
Fixes 8498.
Note that as discussed on IRC, this makes the viewer slightly slower to load *only* in `gulp server` mode, however the difference seem slight enough that I think it will be fine.
Functionality wise, `ensureThumbnailVisible` is essentially just a shorthand for `scrollThumbnailIntoView`. (And note that `PDFViewer` doesn't implement a `ensurePageVisible` method.)
The only remaining usage of `PDFThumbnailViewer_ensureThumbnailVisible` is inside `PDFPresentationMode`, which introduces an otherwise unnecessary `PDFThumbnailViewer` dependency there.
We're already relying on the `presentationmodechanged` event, in various files, to track the state of Presentation Mode. Thus we can simply listen for that event in `PDFSidebar` too, and update the thumbnails if necessary.
This patch is the the first step towards to addressing issue 6158, which will be done by refactoring the code for setting/getting the current scale in `viewer.js`.
