The issue has been open for years now, and has even been marked with `5-good-beginner-bug` for *months*, without any movement.
Considering just how simple the suggested solution is, I'm submitting this patch just to close out a long-standing issue.
The following is printed with every build, which gets kind of annoying when looking at the logs:
```
Replace Autoprefixer browsers option to Browserslist config.
Use browserslist key in package.json or .browserslistrc file.
Using browsers option cause some error. Browserslist config
can be used for Babel, Autoprefixer, postcss-normalize and other tools.
If you really need to use option, rename it to overrideBrowserslist.
Learn more at:
https://github.com/browserslist/browserslist#readmehttps://twitter.com/browserslist
```
Given how we're using Autoprefixer, with a number of build-specific configs, simply changing the option name seems like the easiest solution here.
(I'm also adding a couple of newlines at the `autoprefixer` call-sites, to aid readability.)
Obviously userAgent checks aren't that great, since it's very easy to spoof, but it probably doesn't hurt to attempt to extend this (since it's limited to `GENERIC` builds).
Besides, anyone using the default viewer can always set the `maxCanvasPixels` option to a value of their choosing.
This patch is making me somewhat worried about future regressions, since it's certainly easy to imagine this completely breaking certain kinds of corrupt/edited PDF documents while fixing others.[1]
Obviously it passes all existing reference tests (and even improves one), however compared to many other patches there's no telling how much it could break.
The only reason that I'm even submitting this patch, is because of the number of open issues that it would address.
Generally speaking though, the best course of action would probably be if `XRef.indexObjects` was re-written to be much more robust (since it currently feels somewhat hand-wavy in parts). E.g. by actually checking/validating more of the objects before committing to them.
---
[1] Especially given that it's reverting part of PR 5910, however in the case of issue 5909 it seems that other (more recent) changes have actually made that PR redundant.
Sometimes we also used `@return`, but `@returns` is what the JSDoc
documentation recommends. Even though `@return` works as an alias, it's
good to use the recommended syntax and to be consistent within the
project.
Sometimes we also used `@return` or `@returns`, but `@type` is what
the JSDoc documentation recommends. This also improves the documentation
because before this commit the types were not shown and now they are.
Rather than specifying certain build targets manually, it seems much more appropriate (and future-proof) to use the `SKIP_BABEL` build target instead.
Also, the patch adds a missing `/* eslint no-var: error */` line since I'm touch the file anyway and no code-changes were necessary for it.
As part of attempting to fix a number issues containing PDF documents with corrupt XRef tables, I'd like to improve the reference test-coverage slightly *first*.
Obviously this will increase the runtime of the tests a bit, however I'd rather "waste" resources on the bots instead of developer time fixing regressions which could have been avoided.
For badly generated PDF documents, with issue 6961 being one example, there's well over one hundred thousand function calls being made in total for just the *two* pages.
This handles the two different ways that fonts can be loaded, either by Name (which is the common case) or by Reference.
Furthermore, this also takes the `ignoreErrors` option into account when deciding whether to fallback or Error.
Finally, by creating a minimal but valid Font dictionary, there's no special-cases necessary in any of the font parsing code.
Co-authored-by: huzjakd <huzjakd@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: Jonas Jenwald <jonas.jenwald@gmail.com>
With the sole exception of `meh`[1], none of the locales removed here have even been updated since the last change was made to the default `en-US` locale.
Please note that if/when these locales would start shipping in Nightly again, they will automatically be re-added in PDF.js as well with the `gulp importl10n` command.
---
[1] The current translation is also somewhat incomplete, to put it mildly.
All of these methods have been marked as `deprecated` in *three* releases now, and I'd thus like to (slowly) move towards complete removal.
However rather than just removing the methods right away, which would cause somewhat cryptic failures, this patch tries to implement a hopefully reasonable middle ground by throwing `Error`s with (essentially) the same information as the previous warnings.
While the previous `deprecated` messages could perhaps be seen as optional, with these changes API consumers will now be forced to actually migrate their code.
Rather than having the script remove locales automatically, which seems like a heavy-handed approach at least initially, listing these for manual checking seems nice though.
Rather than having to manually maintain a static list of language codes, it's much easier to simply fetch the active ones from `mozilla-central` instead.
As part of this the code in `external/importL10n/locales.js` was modernized slightly, by using Promises/async functions to get rid of a bunch of annoying callbacks (which shouldn't be a problem for reasonably modern Node.js versions).
*Please note:* I've been thinking about possible ways of addressing this issue for a while now, but all of the solutions I came up with became too complicated and thus hurt readability of the code.
However, it occured to me that we're essentially trying to add a heuristic *on top* of another heuristic, and that it shouldn't matter how efficient the code is as long as it works.
In the PDF file in the issue the Encoding contains glyphNames of the `Cdd` format, which our existing heuristics will treat as base 10 values. However, in this particular file they actually contain base 16 values, which we thus attempt to detect and fix such that text-selection works.
I've absolutely no idea why I wrote the code that way originally, since the nested `if`s are not really helping readability one bit.
Hence this patch which changes things to use early `return`s instead, to help readability.
Rather than manually clamping the `width` here, we can just `export` an already existing helper function from `ui_utils.js` instead.
(Hopefully it will eventually be possible to replace this helper function with a native `Math.clamp` function, given that there exists a "Stage 1 Proposal" for adding such a thing to the ECMAScript specification.)
