There's no good reason for calling this helper function without a `url` parameter, and this way we can prevent that from happening.
Note how the `PDFOutlineViewer` call-site was already doing the right thing here, and only the `LinkAnnotationElement` call-site needed a small adjustment to make it work.
This includes the information in the core and display layers. The
date parsing logic from the document properties is rewritten according
to the specification and now includes unit tests.
Moreover, missing unit tests for the color of a popup annotation have
been added.
Finally the styling of the popup is changed slightly to make the text a
bit smaller (it's currently quite large in comparison to other viewers)
and to make the drop shadow a bit more subtle. The former is done to be
able to easily include the modification date in the popup similar to how
other viewers do this.
The file `test/pdfs/annotation-caret-ink.pdf` is already available in
the repository as a reference test for this since I supplied it for
another patch that implemented ink annotations.
This file (currently) contains not only DOM-specific helper functions/classes, but is used generally for various helper code relevant for main-thread functionality.
First of all, note how there's currently *two* methods for checking if a certain object exists, which seems completely unwarranted.
Furthermore, the rarely used `getData` method was removed and its only callsite changed to use a combination of `PDFObjects.{has, get}` instead.
Finally, the methods were rearranged slightly, to bring the most important ones (for an API user) to the top of the class.
This attempts to reduced the level of indirection, and the amount of code, when dispatching `fileattachmentannotation` events, by removing the `PDFLinkService.onFileAttachmentAnnotation` method and just accessing `PDFLinkService.eventBus` directly in the `FileAttachmentAnnotationElement` constructor.
Given that other properties, such as `externalLinkTarget`/`externalLinkRel`, are already being accessed directly this pattern seems fine here as well.
This removes the `PDFJS.externalLinkTarget`/`PDFJS.externalLinkRel` dependency from the viewer components, but please note that as a *temporary* solution the default viewer still uses it.
This removes the `PDFJS.imageResourcesPath` dependency from the viewer components and the test-suite, but please note that as a *temporary* solution the default viewer still uses it.
It is only used in a few places to handle prefixing style properties if
necessary. However, we used it only for `transform`, `transformOrigin`
and `borderRadius`, which according to Can I Use are supported natively
(unprefixed) in the browsers that PDF.js 2.0 supports. Therefore, we can
remove this class, which should help performance too since this avoids
extra function calls in parts of the code that are called often.
This patch provides a new unit tested factory for creating SVG
containers and elements. This code is duplicated twice in the
codebase, but with upcoming changes this would need to be duplicated
even more. Moreover, consolidating this code in one factory allows
us to replace it easily for e.g., supporting Node.js. Therefore, move
this to a central place and update/ES6-ify the related code.
Finally, we replace `setAttributeNS` with `setAttribute` because no
namespace is provided.
Rather than displaying links that does *nothing* when clicked, it probably makes more sense to simply not render them instead. Especially since it turns out that, at least at this point in time, this is *very* easy to both implement and test.
Fixes 3897.
http://eslint.org/docs/rules/comma-danglehttp://eslint.org/docs/rules/object-curly-spacing
Given that we currently have quite inconsistent object formatting, fixing this in *one* big patch probably wouldn't be feasible (since I cannot imagine anyone wanting to review that); hence I've opted to try and do this piecewise instead.
Please note: This patch was created automatically, using the ESLint `--fix` command line option. In a couple of places this caused lines to become too long, and I've fixed those manually; please refer to the interdiff below for the only hand-edits in this patch.
```diff
diff --git a/src/display/canvas.js b/src/display/canvas.js
index 5739f6f2..4216b2d2 100644
--- a/src/display/canvas.js
+++ b/src/display/canvas.js
@@ -2071,7 +2071,7 @@ var CanvasGraphics = (function CanvasGraphicsClosure() {
var map = [];
for (var i = 0, ii = positions.length; i < ii; i += 2) {
map.push({ transform: [scaleX, 0, 0, scaleY, positions[i],
- positions[i + 1]], x: 0, y: 0, w: width, h: height, });
+ positions[i + 1]], x: 0, y: 0, w: width, h: height, });
}
this.paintInlineImageXObjectGroup(imgData, map);
},
diff --git a/src/display/svg.js b/src/display/svg.js
index 9eb05dfa..2aa21482 100644
--- a/src/display/svg.js
+++ b/src/display/svg.js
@@ -458,7 +458,11 @@ SVGGraphics = (function SVGGraphicsClosure() {
for (var x = 0; x < fnArrayLen; x++) {
var fnId = fnArray[x];
- opList.push({ 'fnId': fnId, 'fn': REVOPS[fnId], 'args': argsArray[x], });
+ opList.push({
+ 'fnId': fnId,
+ 'fn': REVOPS[fnId],
+ 'args': argsArray[x],
+ });
}
return opListToTree(opList);
},
```
Please see http://eslint.org/docs/rules/object-shorthand.
For the most part, these changes are of the search-and-replace kind, and the previously enabled `no-undef` rule should complement the tests in helping ensure that no stupid errors crept into to the patch.
This patch implements support for line annotations. Other viewers only
show the popup annotation when hovering over the line, which may have
any orientation. To make this possible, we render an invisible line (SVG
element) over the line on the canvas that acts as the trigger for the
popup annotation. This invisible line has the same starting coordinates,
ending coordinates and width of the line on the canvas.
The display layer is responsible for creating the HTML elements for the
annotations from the core layer. If we need to ignore border styling for
the containers of certain elements, the display layer should do so and
not the core layer. I noticed this during the implementation of line
annotations, for which we actually need the original border width in the
display layer, even though we ignore it for the container. If we set the
border style to zero in the core layer, this becomes impossible.
To prevent this, this patch moves the container border removal code from
the core layer to the display layer. This makes the core layer output
the unchanged annotation data and lets the display layer remove any
border styling if necessary.
Other PDF viewers, e.g. Adobe Reader, seem to append `FileAttachment`s to their attachments views.
One obvious difference in PDF.js is that we cannot append all the annotations on document load, since that would require parsing *every* page. Despite that, it still seems like a good idea to add `FileAttachment`s, since it's thus possible to access all the various types of attachments from a single place.
*Note:* With the previous patch we display a notification when a `FileAttachment` is added to the sidebar, which thus makes appending the contents of these annotations to the sidebar slightly more visible/useful.
Using `else` after `return` is not necessary, and can often lead to unnecessarily cluttered code. By using the `no-else-return` rule in ESLint we can avoid this pattern, see http://eslint.org/docs/rules/no-else-return.
Modern browsers support styling radio buttons and checkboxes with CSS.
This makes the implementation much easier, and the fallback for older
browsers is still decent.
Moreover, we refactor the code a bit to extract code that is shared
between the two branches and we only apply text alignment (and create
the array) when it is actually defined, since it's optional and left is
already the default.
This patch is the first step towards implementing support for
interactive forms (AcroForms). It makes it possible to render text
widget annotations exactly like Adobe Reader/Acrobat.
Everything we implement for AcroForms is disabled by default using a
preference, mainly because it is not ready to use yet, but has to
implemented in many steps to avoid complexity. The preference allows us
to work with the code while not exposing the behavior by default. Mainly
storing entered values and printing them is still absent, which would be
minimal requirements for enabling this by default.
