With upcoming changes we'll potentially start to cache `ImageBitmap` data at the document-level, in addition to just at the page-level.
Hence we need to ensure that such data is actually released on clean-up, and rather than duplicating the existing *manual* handling this code is instead moved into the `PDFObjects.clear` method. (In my opinion, this is an overall improvement even without globally cached `ImageBitmap` data.)
*Please note:* This patch is written using the GitHub UI, since I'm currently without a dev machine, so hopefully it's correct and makes sense.
The `Buffer`-object is Node.js specific functionality[1], thus (obviously) not found in browsers. Please note that the PDF.js library has never officially supported/documented that binary data can be passed as a `Buffer`, and that *internally* in the `src/core`-code we only work with standard `Uint8Array`s.
This means that if, in Node.js environments, a `Buffer` is passed to the API we need to wrap it into a `Uint8Array`, which essentially means creating a copy of the data and thus increasing memory usage.
---
[1] Refer to https://nodejs.org/api/buffer.html#buffer
- Pass the `URL`-object directly to `getDocument`, since that's been supported since PR 13166.
- Remove support for the `disableRange`-option in the test-manifest, since it's completely unused. Please note that it's originally added in PR 2719, however there's never actually been any reference tests using it (not even from the start).
Given that the option is `false` by default everywhere (e.g. in the Firefox PDF Viewer) and that we have unit-tests for `disableRange = true`, it doesn't seem necessary to add new reference tests for it now.
Currently we duplicate the same code more than once in the `test/driver.js` file, which we can avoid by adding a new `AnnotationStorage` helper method instead.
Given that this helper function is only used on the worker-thread, there's no reason to duplicate it in both of the *built* `pdf.js` and `pdf.worker.js` files.
Currently these classes take a bunch of parameters (somewhat randomly ordered), probably because this is very old code that's been extended over the years.
Hence this patch changes the constructors to use parameter-objects instead, which improves consistency and (slightly) reduces the amount of code as well.
*Please note:* Also removes the `msgHandler`-property on these classes, since I cannot find a single call-site that accesses it.
Given that the debugging hash-parameters will only be used when the `pdfBugEnabled` option is manually set[1], we can skip a *tiny* bit of asynchronicity for "regular" users.
---
[1] Note that it's enabled by default in the development viewer, i.e. in `gulp server` mode.
Currently this helper function only has two call-sites, and both of them only pass in `ArrayBuffer` data. Given how it's implemented there's a couple of code-paths that are completely unused (e.g. the "string" one), and in particular the intended fast-paths don't actually work.
This patch re-factors and simplifies the helper function, and it'll no longer accept anything except `ArrayBuffer` data (hence why it's also re-named).
Note that at the time when `arraysToBytes` was added we still supported browsers without TypedArray functionality, and we'd then simulate them using regular Arrays.
When printing the pdf in #12233 in Acrobat, we can see that the combo for country
is empty: it's because the V entry doesn't have to be one of the options.
We're using this helper function when reading data from the [`PDFWorkerStreamReader.read`](a49d1d1615/src/core/worker_stream.js (L90-L98)) and [`PDFWorkerStreamRangeReader.read`](a49d1d1615/src/core/worker_stream.js (L122-L128)) methods, and as can be seen they always return `ArrayBuffer` data. Hence we can simply get the `byteLength` directly, and don't need to use the helper function.
Note that at the time when `arrayByteLength` was added we still supported browsers without TypedArray functionality, and we'd then simulate them using regular Arrays.
In the mac case we don't want to care about the scaleFactor threshold
because else if too big another move could start and then subsequent
events aren't considered as wheel events.
It isn't really ideal and at some point we'll need to find a way at
least for the Firefox case to get the real events instead of the fake
wheel ones.
