At the beginning of a search we can an update can be triggered with 0 over 0
found matches.
In the GeckoView context, we can't update the finder whenever we want but only
when it has been required.
In GeckoView, on an event, a callback must be executed with the result of an action,
but the callback can be used only one time.
So for each FindInPage event, we must trigger only one matches count update.
Adding some logging with `console.{time, timeEnd}` around all the constant definitions at the top of the `web/pdf_find_controller.js` file, I noticed that computing `DIACRITICS_EXCEPTION_STR` took close to half the total time.
My first idea was just to try and make it slightly more efficient, by reducing the amount of iterations and intermediate allocations. However, with this constant only being used during "match diacritics" searches it thus seemed like a good candidate for lazy initialization.
*Please note:* Given that this is a micro optimization, I fully understand if the patch is rejected.
This was moved into the `src/display/`-folder in PR 15110, for the initial editor-a11y patch. However, with the changes in PR 15237 we're again only using `binarySearchFirstItem` in the `web/`-folder and it thus seem reasonable to move it back there.
The primary reason for moving it back is that `binarySearchFirstItem` is currently exposed in the public API, and we always want to avoid that unless it's either PDF-related functionality or code that simply must be shared between the `src/`- and `web/`-folders. In this case, `binarySearchFirstItem` is a general helper function that doesn't really satisfy either of those alternatives.
- In the annotationEditorLayer, reorder the editors in the DOM according
the position of the elements on the screen;
- add an aria-owns attribute on the "nearest" element in the text layer
which points to the added editor.
- it aims to fix https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1771477;
- hangul contains some syllables which are decomposed when using NFD, hence
the text must be correctly shifted in case it contains some of them.
Currently we're resolving the Promises in the `_extractTextPromises` Array with the page-index, despite that not really being necessary since the Promises in the Array are explicitly inserted in the correct order.
Furthermore, we can replace the standard `for`-loop with a `for...of`-loop which results in ever so slightly more compact code.
- it aims to fix#14562;
- 'X-\n' were not correctly positioned;
- when X is a diacritic (e.g. in "sä-\n", which is decomposed into "sa¨-\n") we must handle both things:
- diacritics on the one hand;
- "-\n" on the other hand.
- get original index in using a dichotomic seach instead of a linear one;
- normalize the text in using NFD;
- convert the query string into a RegExp;
- replace whitespaces in the query with \s+;
- handle hyphens at eol use to break a word;
- add some \s* around punctuation signs
With these changes, we'll now *always* replace all whitespaces with standard spaces (0x20). This behaviour is already, since many years, the default in both the viewer and the browser-tests.
This patch, first of all, removes circular dependencies in the TypeScript definitions. Secondly, it also moves `RenderingStates` into `web/ui_utils.js` to break another type-dependency and directly use the `XfaLayerBuilder` during XFA-printing.
Finally, note that this patch *slightly* reduces the size of the default viewer (e.g. in the `MOZCENTRAL` build) by not having to bundle code which is completely unused.
This patch circumvents the issues seen when trying to update TypeScript to version `4.5`, by "simply" fixing the broken/missing JSDocs and `typedef`s such that `gulp typestest` now passes.
As always, given that I don't really know anything about TypeScript, I cannot tell if this is a "correct" and/or proper way of doing things; we'll need TypeScript users to help out with testing!
*Please note:* I'm sorry about the size of this patch, but given how intertwined all of this unfortunately is it just didn't seem easy to split this into smaller parts.
However, one good thing about this TypeScript update is that it helped uncover a number of pre-existing bugs in our JSDocs comments.
Looking at the code, I do have to agree with the point made in issue 12731 about it being unexpected/unhelpful that the `PDFFindController.executeCommand`-method isn't directly usable with the "find"-event.
The reason for it being this way is, as so often, for historical reasons: The `executeCommand`-method was added (just) prior to the introduction of the `EventBus` in the viewer.
Obviously we cannot simply change the existing `PDFFindController.executeCommand`-method, since that'd be a breaking change in code which has existed for over five years.
Initially I figured that we could simply add a new method in `PDFFindController` that'd accept the state from the "find"-event, however after thinking about this and looking through the use-cases in the default viewer I settled on a slightly different approach: Let the `PDFFindController` just listen for the "find"-event (on the `EventBus`-instance) directly instead, which also removes one level of (unneeded) indirection during searching in the default viewer.
For GENERIC builds of the PDF.js library, the old `PDFFindController.executeCommand`-method is still available with a deprecation warning.
Note that as far as I can tell, this is *not* a regression but rather a bug which has existed since basically "forever".
**In order to reproduce this easily:**
- Open the viewer.
- Set the zoom level to `400%`,
- Search for "expression".
The problem here is that when scrolling matches into view, we're scrolling to the start of the *containing* `textLayer` element rather than the start of the highlighted match itself.[1] When the entire width (or at least most) of the page is visible in the viewer, that doesn't really matter though which is likely why this bug has gone unnoticed for so long.[2]
Given that the highlighted match can be placed anywhere, e.g. even at the very end, within its `textLayer` element it's quite easy to see why the current implementation becomes a problem at higher zoom levels. All of this is then *further* exacerbated by `PDFFindController.scrollMatchIntoView` using a negative left offset, to ensure that the current match has some (visible) context available once scrolled into view.
In order to address this long-standing bug, we'll determine the (left) offset of the `selected` match and use that to modify the final position scrolled to in `PDFFindController.scrollMatchIntoView` such that the match is visible regardless of zoom level.
---
[1] Unfortunately we cannot directly scroll to the `selected` match, since it's not absolutely positioned and changing that would cause other bugs/regressions (note recent patches in that area).
[2] I did actually stumble upon this problem a little while ago, while working on PR 13482, but forgot to look into this again until I saw the new issue.
This patch is a rebased *and* refactored version of PR 9448, such that it applies cleanly given that `PDFFindController` has changed since that PR was opened; obviously keeping the original author information intact.
This patch will thus ensure that e.g. fractions, and other things that we normalize before searching, will still be highlighted correctly in the textLayer.
Furthermore, this patch also adds basic unit-tests for this functionality.
*Note:* The `[api-minor]` tag is added, since third-party implementations of the `PDFFindController` must now always use the `pageMatchesLength` property to get accurate length information (see the `web/text_layer_builder.js` changes).
Co-authored-by: Ross Johnson <ross@mazira.com>
Co-authored-by: Jonas Jenwald <jonas.jenwald@gmail.com>
Please note that these changes were done automatically, using `gulp lint --fix`.
Given that the major version number was increased, there's a fair number of (primarily whitespace) changes; please see https://prettier.io/blog/2020/03/21/2.0.0.html
In order to reduce the size of these changes somewhat, this patch maintains the old "arrowParens" style for now (once mozilla-central updates Prettier we can simply choose the same formatting, assuming it will differ here).
The correct/intended way of working with the "viewer components" is by providing an `EventBus` instance upon initialization, and the `getGlobalEventBus` was only added for backwards compatibility.
Note, for example, that using `getGlobalEventBus` doesn't really work at all well with a use-case where there's *multiple* `PDFViewer` instances on a one page, since it may then be difficult/impossible to tell which viewer a particular event originated from.
All of the "viewer components" examples have been previously updated, such that there's no longer any code/examples which relies on the now removed `getGlobalEventBus` functionality.
*This is part of a series of patches that will try to split PR 11566 into smaller chunks, to make reviewing more feasible.*
Once all the code has been fixed, we'll be able to eventually enable the ESLint `no-shadow` rule; see https://eslint.org/docs/rules/no-shadow
Since the goal has always been, essentially since the `EventBus` abstraction was added, to remove all dispatching of DOM events[1] from the viewer components this patch tries to address one thing that came up when updating the examples:
The DOM events are always dispatched last, and it's thus guaranteed that all internal event listeners have been invoked first.
However, there's no such guarantees with the general `EventBus` functionality and the order in which event listeners are invoked is *not* specified. With the promotion of the `EventBus` in the examples, over DOM events, it seems like a good idea to at least *try* to keep this ordering invariant[2] intact.
Obviously this won't prevent anyone from manually calling the new *internal* viewer component methods on the `EventBus`, but hopefully that won't be too common since any existing third-party code would obviously use the `on`/`off` methods and that all of the examples shows the *correct* usage (which should be similarily documented on the "Third party viewer usage" Wiki-page).
---
[1] Looking at the various Firefox-tests, I'm not sure that it'll be possible to (easily) re-write all of them to not rely on DOM events (since getting access to `PDFViewerApplication` might be generally difficult/messy depending on scopes).
In any case, even if technically feasible, it would most likely add *a lot* of complication that may not be desireable in the various Firefox-tests. All-in-all, I'd be fine with keeping the DOM events only for the `MOZCENTRAL` target and gated on `Cu.isInAutomation` (or similar) rather than a preference.
[2] I wouldn't expect any *real* bugs in a custom implementation, simply based on event ordering, but it nonetheless seem like a good idea if any "external" events are still handled last.
To avoid outright breaking third-party usages of the "viewer components" the `getGlobalEventBus` functionality is left intact, but a deprecation message is printed if the function is invoked.
The various examples are updated to *explicitly* initialize an `EventBus` instance, and provide that when initializing the relevant viewer components.
In order to eventually get rid of SystemJS and start using native `import`s instead, we'll need to provide "complete" file identifiers since otherwise there'll be MIME type errors when attempting to use `import`.
This patch makes the follow changes:
- Remove no longer necessary inline `// eslint-disable-...` comments.
- Fix `// eslint-disable-...` comments that Prettier moved down, thus causing new linting errors.
- Concatenate strings which now fit on just one line.
- Fix comments that are now too long.
- Finally, and most importantly, adjust comments that Prettier moved down, since the new positions often is confusing or outright wrong.
Note that Prettier, purposely, has only limited [configuration options](https://prettier.io/docs/en/options.html). The configuration file is based on [the one in `mozilla central`](https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/source/.prettierrc) with just a few additions (to avoid future breakage if the defaults ever changes).
Prettier is being used for a couple of reasons:
- To be consistent with `mozilla-central`, where Prettier is already in use across the tree.
- To ensure a *consistent* coding style everywhere, which is automatically enforced during linting (since Prettier is used as an ESLint plugin). This thus ends "all" formatting disussions once and for all, removing the need for review comments on most stylistic matters.
Many ESLint options are now redundant, and I've tried my best to remove all the now unnecessary options (but I may have missed some).
Note also that since Prettier considers the `printWidth` option as a guide, rather than a hard rule, this patch resorts to a small hack in the ESLint config to ensure that *comments* won't become too long.
*Please note:* This patch is generated automatically, by appending the `--fix` argument to the ESLint call used in the `gulp lint` task. It will thus require some additional clean-up, which will be done in a *separate* commit.
(On a more personal note, I'll readily admit that some of the changes Prettier makes are *extremely* ugly. However, in the name of consistency we'll probably have to live with that.)
Sometimes we also used `@return` or `@returns`, but `@type` is what
the JSDoc documentation recommends. This also improves the documentation
because before this commit the types were not shown and now they are.
Unless the `PDFLinkService` instance contains all of the expected methods, a lot of things will break in various places in the default viewer. Hence there's not much value in having this check, and outright falling seems more appropriate.
Finally, this also makes the return value explicit in this case, since that's consistent with the rest of the `PDFFindController._shouldDirtyMatch` method.
Only scroll search results into view as a result of an actual find operation, and not when the user scrolls/zooms/rotates the document (bug 1237076, issue 6746)
Most of the code in `PDFFindController` assumes that a valid `state` always exits, hence it cannot hurt to add a simple check to avoid errors being thrown.
Currently searching, and particularily highlighting of search results, may interfere with subsequent user-interactions such as scrolling/zooming/rotating which can result in a somewhat jarring UX where the document suddenly "jumps" to a previous position.
This is especially annoying in cases where the highlighted search result isn't even visible when a user initiated scrolling/zooming/rotating happens, and there exists a couple of bugs/issues about this behaviour.
It seems reasonable, as far as I'm concerned, to treat searching as one operation and any subsequent non-search user interactions with the viewer as separate and thus not scroll the current search result into view *unless* the user is actually doing another search.
This also seems consistent with general searching in e.g. Firefox and Adobe Reader:
- Compare with "regular" searching of e.g. HTML files in Firefox, where the user scrolling and/or zooming the document will not force a currently highlighted search result to become re-scrolled into view.
- Compare also with Adobe Reader, where the user scrolling, zooming, and/or rotating the document will not force the currently highlighted search result to become re-scrolled into view.
The question is then why search highlighting was implemented this way in PDF.js to begin with. It might be that this wasn't really intended behaviour, but more a consequence of the asynchronous nature of the API. Considering that most operations, such as fetching the page, rendering it and extracting its text-content are all asynchronous; searching and highlighting of matches thus becomes asynchronous too.
However, it should be possible to track when search results have been scrolled into view and highlighted, and thus prevent these wierd "jumps" when the user interacts with the document.
*Please note:* Unfortunately this required moving the scrolling of matches back into `PDFFindController`, since I simply couldn't see any other (reasonable) way of implementing the functionality without tracking the `_shouldScroll` property in only *one* spot.
However, given that the new `PDFFindController.scrollMatchIntoView` method follows a similar pattern as `BaseViewer.scrollPageIntoView` and `PDFThumbnailViewer.scrollThumbnailIntoView`, this is hopefully deemed OK.
Currently we'll only attempt to start from the current page when a new search is done, however for 'findagain' operations we'll always continue from the last match position.
This could easily lead to confusing behaviour if the user has scrolled to a completely different part of the document. In an attempt to improve this somewhat, for repeated 'findagain' operations, we'll instead reset the position to the current page when it's *absolutely* certain that the user has scrolled.
Note that this required adding a new `BaseViewer` method, and exposing that through `PDFLinkService`, in order to check if a given page is visible.
In an attempt to avoid issues, in custom implementations of `PDFFindController`, the code checks for the existence of the `PDFLinkService.isPageVisible` method *before* using it.
Unfortunately the `PDFFindController.executeCommand` method has now become a bit more complicated than one would like, but hopefully this small change will improve the structure somewhat (especially for subsequent patches).
