With the changes in PR 17208, where browser-preferences are now handled as "regular" viewer-options, we can tweak the definition of `canvasMaxAreaInBytes` to slightly simplify things in the `PDFViewerApplication.open` method.
Hopefully this will allow us to catch bugs in new Node.js versions earlier, rather than having to wait for bug reports.
Given that `CompressionStream` is (currently) only potentially used when saving a *modified* PDF document, which is unlikely to be a common use-case in Node.js environments, let's just disable the affected unit-test for now.
Given that this branch is only necessary in development mode and *during* building, but is never actually used in the final viewer-bundles, we can utilize the pre-processor to ignore this code.
Currently we *synchronously* fetch a number of browser preferences/options, from the platform code, during the viewer respectively PDF document initialization paths.
This seems unnecessary, and we can re-factor the code to instead include the relevant data when fetching the regular viewer preferences.
The active LTS version is now based on Node.js version 20, hence let's update the relevant workflows to use that one instead; see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Node.js#Releases
Given that we still support Node.js version 18, i.e. the maintenance LTS version, in the PDF.js library we'll keep testing both versions in GitHub Actions to prevent regressions.
I noticed the following warning in the GitHub Actions workflow logs:
`Configuration file not found: .github/linter_config.yml`
The configuration file is called `fluent_linter_config.yml` instead, so
this commit fixes the path so it points to the correct file.
Fixes 487816b.
The current stable version of Python is Python 3.12, see
https://www.python.org/downloads, so we should switch to that since
Python 3.10 is older and only receives security updates.
This commit tweaks the Fluent linter workflow to match the other
workflow files we have, so we make sure the steps have a newline between
them for better readability and align names and descriptions of steps
with how they are called in the other workflow files we have.
There are environments that include *incomplete* polyfills for the `navigator`-object, which may thus cause the PDF.js library to break.
Despite that clearly not being our fault, it may still result in bug reports filed against the PDF.js project; see e.g. 15728.
Currently this even seem to affect *the latest* version of Node.js; see e.g. [here].
*Please note:* Thanks to the pre-processor none of these changes affect the Firefox PDF Viewer, however it does add "overhead" when working with and reviewing the affected code (which is why I'm not crazy about this).
*Please note:* While following the steps in the README still works with this patch, in the sense that the example runs and successfully renders a PDF document, I unfortunately cannot tell if it illustrates Webpack best practices.
- Remove the `errorWrapper`-element, since it simplifies the example and is consistent with the default viewer; see PR 15533.
- Simplify the l10n-handling, since the `NullL10n` should be able to translate everything e.g. without fallback values; see PR 17146.
Note that we must append the textLayer to the DOM *before* enabling the `highlighter` and `accessibilityManager`, to avoid breaking e.g. a pending searching operation.
The least invasive solution, that I was able to come up with, is to introduce a new `TextLayerBuilder` callback-function for this purpose.
Currently the `WidgetAnnotationElement._getKeyModifier` method will always be falsy on Linux, which seems like a simple oversight. Looking at all the other `FeatureTest.platform` accesses we only handle the `isMac`-case specially, and it seems reasonable to do the same thing here.
The reason that this hasn't led to any bug reports is most likely that the `modifier`-property seems completely unused in the scripting-implementation.
Finally, with these changes we can (slightly) simplify the `FeatureTest.platform` implementation.
After PR 17177 the interface of `XfaLayerBuilder` is now inconsistent, since whether or not we directly append the xfaLayer to the DOM now depends on the rendering intent.
