It appears that the PDF document in [bug 1292316](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1292316) now renders "correctly"[1] when compared to e.g. Adobe Reader and PDFium. Most likely this bug was fixed by a *somewhat* recent patch, or patches, to the `XRef.indexObjects` method.
Before just closing [bug 1292316](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1292316) as WFM, I figured that it probably can't hurt to add it as a new test-case to avoid accidentally regressing this document in the future.
---
[1] Given that the XRef table is corrupt, and that we're forced to recover, there's generally speaking probably some question as to what actually constitutes "correct" in this case.
Currently only the `gulp unittest` task actually set the time-zone, which means that locally I'm now getting failures with e.g. `gulp test`.
*Please note:* I firmly believe that the unit-tests in question should be re-written, since even with this patch applied there's failures when running http://localhost:8888/test/unit/unit_test.html directly in a browser.
There doesn't seem to be anything definitive about this in
the spec, but from experimenting, it seems acrobat lets
PDFs override the widths of the standard fonts.
Given that the GENERIC default viewer supports opening more than one document, and that a unique scripting-instance is now used for each document, the changes made in this patch seem appropriate.
While it's not entirely clear to me that it's ultimately desirable to use the `pdf.sandbox.js` in the Chromium-extension, given that the MOZCENTRAL-build uses `pdf.scripting.js` directly in a *custom* sandbox, the current state isn't that great since setting `enableScripting = true` with the Chromium-extension will currently fail completely.
Hence this patch, which should at least unbreak things for now.
Since the `close` method has become quite large, this small re-factoring shouldn't hurt (and may also be useful with future changes to the `_initializeJavaScript` method).
I completely missed this previously, but we obviously should remove the scriptElement as well to *really* clean-up everything properly.
Given that there's multiple existing usages of `loadScript` in the code-base, the safest/quickest solution seemed to be to have call-sites opt-in to remove the scriptElement using a new parameter.
This patch *attempts* to actually implement what's described for the `Count`-entry in the PDF specification, see https://www.adobe.com/content/dam/acom/en/devnet/acrobat/pdfs/PDF32000_2008.pdf#G11.2095911, which I mostly ignored back in PR 10890 since it seemed unnecessarily complicated[1].
Besides issue 12704, I've also tested a couple of other documents (e.g. the PDF specification) and these changes don't *seem* to break anything else; additional testing would be helpful though!
---
[1] At the time, all PDF documents that I tested worked even with a very simple approach and I thus hoped that it'd would suffice.
Similar to the previous patch, the GENERIC default viewer is capable of opening more than *one* PDF document and we should ensure that we handle that case correctly.
I was actually quite surprised to find that, despite the various `scripting`-getters implementing `destroySandbox` methods, there were no attempts at actually cleaning-up either the "sandbox" or removing the globally registered event listeners.
This patch also changes the method to skip *all* data fetching when "enableScripting" isn't active. Finally, simplifies some event-data accesses in the "updateFromSandbox" listener.
Another possible option here could be to use the `contentLength`, when it exists, and then using e.g. a custom event to always update the "filesize" in the sandbox "after the fact" with the result of the `getDownloadInfo`-call.
We can easily avoid unnecessary API-calls here, since most of the time the `metadata` will already be available here. In the *rare* case that it's not available, we can simply wait for the existing `getMetadata`-call to resolve.
This will be useful in the following patch, and note that there's also an old issue (see 5765) which asked for such an event. However, given that the use-case wasn't *clearly* specified, and that we didn't have an internal use for it at the time it wasn't implemented.
Also, ensure that all of the metadata-related properties are actually reset when the document is closed.
This simplifies not just this code, but the unit-tests as well, and should be sufficient as far as I can tell.
Note also that currently, in the *built* `pdf.sandbox.js` file, there's even a line reading `testMode = testMode && false;` because of an accidentally flipped pre-processor statement.
Finally, in the `scripting_spec.js` unit-test, defines `sandboxBundleSrc` at the top of the file to make it easier to find and/or change it when necessary.
Compared to the, previously removed, `sandbox`/`watch-sandbox` gulp-tasks, these ones should work even when run against an non-existent/empty `build`-folder.
Also, to ensure that the development viewer actually works out-of-the-box, `gulp server` will now also include `gulp watch-dev-sandbox` to remove the need to *manually* invoke the build-tasks.
Finally, this patch also removes the `web/devcom.js` file since it shouldn't actually be needed, assuming that the "sandbox"-loading code in the `web/genericcom.js` file is actually *correctly* implemented.
The way that the `pdf.sandbox.js` building was implemented feels all kinds of inconsistent/wrong, and it "sticks out" quite a bit when compared to the rest of the `gulpfile.js`. This patch thus attempts to improve the current situation slightly, to hopefully make future maintenance easier.
One thing that strikes you, pretty immediately, when looking at PR 12604 is that the two new `gulp`-tasks added (i.e. `sandbox` and `watch-sandbox`) don't even work!?
The reason for this is that they implicitly dependent upon the result of the `buildnumber`-task, which isn't listed as a dependency. (Try running `gulp clean` *first*, and invoking any of the new `gulp`-tasks will inevitably fail.)
Furthermore, there's another (potentially big) problem with the implementation of e.g. the `gulp sandbox` task, since it doesn't actually wait for all building to complete before the task is considered as "done". This has the potential to cause all sorts of subtle bugs elsewhere, and the fact that things even "work" as-is can probably be attributed mostly to luck.
Unfortunately there's no *perfect* way to improve things here, since the `pdf.sandbox.js` file depends on including the `pdf.scripting.js` file as a string, however I firmly believe that improvements are still possible here.
To that end, this patch updates all relevant build-targets to create a *temporary* `pdf.scripting.js` file as part of the setup in the `gulp`-tasks, and then reads that file during the `pdf.sandbox.js` building.
This at least allows us to bring all of this "sandbox"-build code much more in-line with the existing build-system.
