Given that the GitHub Advanced Security workflow now covers everything that LGTM does, but generally faster and with better GitHub-integration, there's no longer much point in also running LGTM separately.
As a follow-up to this patch, we should also disable/remove the LGTM-integration from the PDF.js repository.
Most of the warnings we don't really care about, and those are simply white-listed using inline comments; however two cases prompted actual code changes:
- In `src/display/pattern_helper.js` the branch in question is indeed unreachable, and should thus be safe to remove. (This code originated in PR 4192, which is now over seven years ago.)
- In `test/test.js`, the function in question indeed doesn't accept any arguments. (The patch also re-formats a string just above, which didn't seem worthy of a separated patch.)
This now leaves only *one* warning in the LGTM report, however that one is a false positive that we'll need to report upstream.
- app.alert and few other function can use an object as parameter ({cMsg: ...});
- support app.alert with a question and a yes/no answer;
- update field siblings when one is changed in an action;
- stop calculation if calculate is set to false in the middle of calculations;
- get a boolean for checkboxes when they've been set through annotationStorage instead of a string.
When a PDF is "marked" we now generate a separate DOM that represents
the structure tree from the PDF. This DOM is inserted into the <canvas>
element and allows screen readers to walk the tree and have more
information about headings, images, links, etc. To link the structure
tree DOM (which is empty) to the text layer aria-owns is used. This
required modifying the text layer creation so that marked items are
now tracked.
* JS - Handle correctly hierarchy of fields
- it aims to fix#13132;
- annotations can inherit their actions from the parent field;
- there are some fields which act as a container for other fields:
- they can be access through js so need to add them with an empty type (nothing in the spec about that but checked in Acrobat);
- calculation order list (CO) can reference them so need make them through this.getField;
- getArray method must return kids.
- field values are number, string, ... depending of their type but nothing in the spec on how to know what's the type:
- according to the comment for Canonical Format: https://www.adobe.com/content/dam/acom/en/devnet/pdf/pdfs/PDF32000_2008.pdf#page=461
- it seems that this "type" can be guessed from js action Format (when setting a type in Acrobat DC, the only affected thing is this action).
- util.scand with an empty string returns the current date.
- strokeColor corresponds to borderColor;
- support fillColor and textColor;
- support colors on the different annotations;
- fix typo in aforms (+test).
It seems that the timeout is way too short in practice, since this new integration-test failed *intermittently* already in PR 12702 (which is where the test was added).
The ideal solution here would be to simply await an event, dispatched by the viewer, however that unfortunately doesn't appear to be supported by Puppeteer.
Instead, the solution implemented here is to add a new method in `PDFViewerApplication` which Puppeteer can query to check if the scripting/sandbox has been fully initialized.
* the goal is to execute actions like Open or OpenAction
* can be tested with issue6106.pdf (auto-print)
* once #12701 is merged, we can add page actions
