Some of the code in `src/core/jpg.js` is fairly old, and has with time become unnecessary when the surrounding code has been updated to handle various types of JPEG corruption.
In particular the `if (!marker || marker <= 0xff00) { ... }` branch is now dead code, since:
- The `!marker` case can no longer happen, since we would already have broken out of the loop thanks to the `!fileMarker` branch a handful of lines above.
- The `marker <= 0xff00` case can also no longer happen, since the `findNextFileMarker` function validate markers much more thoroughly (by checking `marker >= 0xffc0 && marker <= 0xfffe`). Hence we'd again have broken out of the loop via the `!fileMarker` branch above when no valid marker was found.
Given the way that "classes" were previously implemented in PDF.js, using regular functions and closures, there's a fair number of false positives when the `no-shadow` ESLint rule was enabled.
Note that while *some* of these `eslint-disable` statements can be removed if/when the relevant code is converted to proper `class`es, we'll probably never be able to get rid of all of them given our naming/coding conventions (however I don't really see this being a problem).
*This is part of a series of patches that will try to split PR 11566 into smaller chunks, to make reviewing more feasible.*
Once all the code has been fixed, we'll be able to eventually enable the ESLint no-shadow rule; see https://eslint.org/docs/rules/no-shadow
*This whole patch feels somewhat arbitrary, and I'd be slightly worried about possibly breaking something else.*
To limit the impact of these changes, we only re-parse JPEG images using a reduced `scanLines` value if and only if: An unexpected EOI (End of Image) marker was encountered during decoding of Scan data *and* the "actual" `scanLines` value is at least one order of magnitude smaller than expected.
As can be seen in the code, the `xScaleBlockOffset` typed array doesn't depend on the actual image data but only on the width and x-scale. The width is obviously consistent for an image, and it turns out that in practice the `componentScaleX` is quite often identical between two (or more) adjacent image components.
All-in-all it's thus not necessary to *unconditionally* re-compute the `xScaleBlockOffset` when getting the JPEG image data.
While avoiding, in many cases, one or more loops can never be a bad thing these changes are unfortunately completely dominated by the rest of the JpegImage code and consequently doesn't really show up in benchmark results. *Hence I'd understand if this patch is ultimately deemed not necessary.*
*Note:* This is inspired by PR 5473, which made similar changes for another kind of JPEG data.
Since the implementation in `src/core/jpg.js` only supports 8-bit data, as opposed to similar code in `src/core/colorspace.js`, the computations can be further simplified since the `scale` is always constant.
By updating the coefficients, effectively inlining the `scale`, we'll thus avoid *four* multiplications for each loop iteration.
Unfortunately I wasn't able, based on a quick look through the test-files, to find a sufficiently *large* CMYK JPEG image in order for these changes to really show up in benchmark results. However, when testing the `cmykjpeg.pdf` manually there's a total of `120 000` fewer multiplication with this patch.
- Re-factor the "incorrect encoding" check, since this can be easily achieved using the general `findNextFileMarker` helper function (with a suitable `startPos` argument).
- Tweak a condition, to make it easier to see that the end of the data has been reached.
- Add a reference test for issue 1877, since it's what prompted the "incorrect encoding" check.
The other image decoders, i.e. the JBIG2 and JPEG 2000 ones, are using the common helper function `readUint16`. Most likely, the only reason that the JPEG decoder is doing it this way is because it originated *outside* of the PDF.js library.
Hence we can simply re-factor `src/core/jpg.js` to use the common `readUint16` helper function, which is especially nice given that the functionality was essentially *duplicated* in the code.
Please find additional details about the ESLint rule at https://eslint.org/docs/rules/prefer-const
With the recent introduction of Prettier this sort of mass enabling of ESLint rules becomes a lot easier, since the code will be automatically reformatted as necessary to account for e.g. changed line lengths.
Note that this patch is generated automatically, by using the ESLint `--fix` argument, and will thus require some additional clean-up (which is done separately).
This removes a couple of, thanks to preceeding code, unnecessary `typeof PDFJSDev` checks, and also fixes a couple of incorrectly implemented (my fault) checks intended for `TESTING` builds.
This rule is already enabled in mozilla-central, and helps avoid some confusing formatting, see https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/9e45d74b956be046e5021a746b0c8912f1c27318/tools/lint/eslint/eslint-plugin-mozilla/lib/configs/recommended.js#209-210
With the recent introduction of Prettier some of the existing nested ternary statements became even more difficult to read, since any possibly helpful indentation was removed.
This particular ESLint rule wasn't entirely straightforward to enable, and I do recognize that there's a certain amount of subjectivity in the changes being made. Generally, the changes in this patch fall into three categories:
- Cases where a value is only clamped to a certain range (the easiest ones to update).
- Cases where the values involved are "simple", such as Numbers and Strings, which are re-factored to initialize the variable with the *default* value and only update it when necessary by using `if`/`else if` statements.
- Cases with more complex and/or larger values, such as TypedArrays, which are re-factored to let the variable be (implicitly) undefined and where all values are then set through `if`/`else if`/`else` statements.
Please find additional details about the ESLint rule at https://eslint.org/docs/rules/no-nested-ternary
In order to eventually get rid of SystemJS and start using native `import`s instead, we'll need to provide "complete" file identifiers since otherwise there'll be MIME type errors when attempting to use `import`.
This patch makes the follow changes:
- Remove no longer necessary inline `// eslint-disable-...` comments.
- Fix `// eslint-disable-...` comments that Prettier moved down, thus causing new linting errors.
- Concatenate strings which now fit on just one line.
- Fix comments that are now too long.
- Finally, and most importantly, adjust comments that Prettier moved down, since the new positions often is confusing or outright wrong.
Note that Prettier, purposely, has only limited [configuration options](https://prettier.io/docs/en/options.html). The configuration file is based on [the one in `mozilla central`](https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/source/.prettierrc) with just a few additions (to avoid future breakage if the defaults ever changes).
Prettier is being used for a couple of reasons:
- To be consistent with `mozilla-central`, where Prettier is already in use across the tree.
- To ensure a *consistent* coding style everywhere, which is automatically enforced during linting (since Prettier is used as an ESLint plugin). This thus ends "all" formatting disussions once and for all, removing the need for review comments on most stylistic matters.
Many ESLint options are now redundant, and I've tried my best to remove all the now unnecessary options (but I may have missed some).
Note also that since Prettier considers the `printWidth` option as a guide, rather than a hard rule, this patch resorts to a small hack in the ESLint config to ensure that *comments* won't become too long.
*Please note:* This patch is generated automatically, by appending the `--fix` argument to the ESLint call used in the `gulp lint` task. It will thus require some additional clean-up, which will be done in a *separate* commit.
(On a more personal note, I'll readily admit that some of the changes Prettier makes are *extremely* ugly. However, in the name of consistency we'll probably have to live with that.)
There's a fair number of (primarily) `Array`s/`TypedArray`s whose formatting we don't want disturb, since in many cases that would lead to the code becoming much more difficult to read and/or break existing inline comments.
*Please note:* It may be a good idea to look through these cases individually, and possibly re-write some of the them (especially the `String` ones) to reduce the need for all of these ignore commands.
Currently there's only a single spot in the code-base where `JpegImage.getData` is called, however it nonetheless seem like a good idea to ensure during tests that the `isSourcePDF` parameter is correctly set. (Especially considering that the PDF use-cases will break without it.)
Additionally, in `JpegImage._getLinearizedBlockData`, the code can be made a tiny bit more efficient by checking the value of `isSourcePDF` *first* to avoid useless checks (for the default PDF use-cases).
The purpose of this patch is to provide a better default behaviour when `JpegImage` is used to parse standalone JPEG images with CMYK colour spaces.
Since the issue that the patch concerns is somewhat of a special-case, the implementation utilizes the already existing decode support in an attempt to minimize the impact w.r.t. code size.
*Please note:* It's always possible for the user of `JpegImage` to control image inversion, and thus override the new behaviour, by simply passing a custom `decodeTransform` array upon initialization.
With PDF.js version `2.0` we'll only support browsers with built-in `TypedArray` functionality, hence there doesn't seem to be any good reason not to implement this now.
Fixes 4888.
Please refer to the specification, found at https://www.w3.org/Graphics/JPEG/itu-t81.pdf#page=49
Given how the JPEG decoder is currently implemented, we need to know the value of the scanLines parameter (among others) *before* parsing of the SOS (Start of Scan) data begins.
Hence the best solution I could come up with here, is to re-parse the image in the *hopefully* rare case of JPEG images that include a DNL (Define Number of Lines) marker.
Fixes 8614.
In the JPEG images in the referenced PDF file, the DHT (Define Huffman Tables) segments contain more data than expected based on the length parameter.
Fixes 9425.
I've been looking into the remaining point in 8637 about blurry images, to see if we could perhaps improve the rendering quality slightly there. After quite a bit of debugging, it seems that the issue is limited to certain progressive JPEG images.
As mentioned previously, I've got no detailed knowledge of the JPEG format, but this patch does seem to improve things quite a bit for the images in question.
Squinting at https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/6c33dde6ca02b389c52e8db3d22494df8b916f33/media/libjpeg/jdphuff.c#492-639, it seems reasonable that we should take the sign of the data into account. Furthermore, looking at the specification in https://www.w3.org/Graphics/JPEG/itu-t81.pdf#page=118, the "F.2.4.3 Decoding the binary decision sequence for non-zero DC differences and AC coefficients" section even contains a description of this (even though I cannot claim to really understand the details).
This patch removes the `clamp0to255` helper function, as well as manual clamping code in `src/core/jpg.js`.
The adjusted constants in `_convertCmykToRgb` were taken from CMYK to RGB conversion code found in `src/core/colorspace.js`.
*Please note:* There will be some very slight movement in a number of existing test-cases, since `Uint8ClampedArray` appears to use `Math.round` (or equivalent) and the old code used (basically) `Math.floor`.
According to the PDF specification, please see http://www.adobe.com/content/dam/Adobe/en/devnet/acrobat/pdfs/PDF32000_2008.pdf#G6.2394361, if an Adobe JPEG marker is present it should always take precedence. This even seem to be consistent with the existing comment that is present in the code.
Hence it seems reasonable to interpret `transformCode === 0` as no color conversion being necessary.
Fixes the rendering of page 1 in `issue-4926` (from the test-suite), when the built-in `src/core/jpg.js` image decoder is used.
Please note that the `glyphlist.js` and `unicode.js` files are converted to CommonJS modules instead, since Babel cannot handle files that large and they are thus excluded from transpilation.
Please see http://eslint.org/docs/rules/object-shorthand.
For the most part, these changes are of the search-and-replace kind, and the previously enabled `no-undef` rule should complement the tests in helping ensure that no stupid errors crept into to the patch.
*After browsing through (a version of) the JPEG specification, see https://www.w3.org/Graphics/JPEG/itu-t81.pdf, I hope that this patch makes sense.*
Note that while issue 7828 became a problem after PR 7661, it isn't really a regression from than PR. The explanation is rather that we're now relying on `core/jpg.js` instead of the Native Image decoder in more situations than before, which thus exposed an *existing* issue in our JPEG decoder.
Another factor also seems to be that in many JPEG images, the DRI (Define Restart Interval) marker isn't present, in which case this bug won't manifest either.
According to https://www.w3.org/Graphics/JPEG/itu-t81.pdf#page=89 (at the bottom of the page):
"NOTE – The final restart interval may be smaller than the size specified by the DRI marker segment, as it includes only the number of MCUs remaining in the scan."
Furthermore, according to https://www.w3.org/Graphics/JPEG/itu-t81.pdf#page=39 (in the middle of the page):
"[...] If restart is enabled and the restart interval is defined to be Ri, each entropy-coded segment except the last one shall contain Ri MCUs. The last one shall contain whatever number of MCUs completes the scan."
Based on the above, it thus seem to me that we should simply ensure that we're not attempting to continue to parse Scan data once we've found all MCUs (Minimum Coded Unit) of the image.
Fixes 7828.
Please see http://eslint.org/docs/rules/no-unused-vars; note that this patch purposely uses the same rule options as in `mozilla-central`, such that it fixes part of issue 7957.
It wasn't, in my opinion, entirely straightforward to enable this rule compared to the already existing rules. In many cases a `var descriptiveName = ...` format was used (more or less) to document the code, and I choose to place the old variable name in a trailing comment to not lose that information.
I welcome feedback on these changes, since it wasn't always entirely easy to know what changes made the most sense in every situation.
Please see http://eslint.org/docs/rules/spaced-comment.
Note that the exceptions added for `line` comments are intended to still allow use of the old preprocessor without linting errors.
Also, I took the opportunity to improve the grammar slightly (w.r.t. capitalization and punctuation) for comments touched in the patch.
Using `else` after `return` is not necessary, and can often lead to unnecessarily cluttered code. By using the `no-else-return` rule in ESLint we can avoid this pattern, see http://eslint.org/docs/rules/no-else-return.
*Please note that most of the necessary code adjustments were made in PR 7890.*
ESLint has a number of advantageous properties, compared to JSHint. Among those are:
- The ability to find subtle bugs, thanks to more rules (e.g. PR 7881).
- Much more customizable in general, and many rules allow fine-tuned behaviour rather than the just the on/off rules in JSHint.
- Many more rules that can help developers avoid bugs, and a lot of rules that can be used to enforce a consistent coding style. The latter should be particularily useful for new contributors (and reduce the amount of stylistic review comments necessary).
- The ability to easily specify exactly what rules to use/not to use, as opposed to JSHint which has a default set. *Note:* in future JSHint version some of the rules we depend on will be removed, according to warnings in http://jshint.com/docs/options/, so we wouldn't be able to update without losing lint coverage.
- More easily disable one, or more, rules temporarily. In JSHint this requires using a numeric code, which isn't very user friendly, whereas in ESLint the rule name is simply used instead.
By default there's no rules enabled in ESLint, but there are some default rule sets available. However, to prevent linting failures if we update ESLint in the future, it seemed easier to just explicitly specify what rules we want.
Obviously this makes the ESLint config file somewhat bigger than the old JSHint config file, but given how rarely that one has been updated over the years I don't think that matters too much.
I've tried, to the best of my ability, to ensure that we enable the same rules for ESLint that we had for JSHint. Furthermore, I've also enabled a number of rules that seemed to make sense, both to catch possible errors *and* various style guide violations.
Despite the ESLint README claiming that it's slower that JSHint, https://github.com/eslint/eslint#how-does-eslint-performance-compare-to-jshint, locally this patch actually reduces the runtime for `gulp` lint (by approximately 20-25%).
A couple of stylistic rules that would have been nice to enable, but where our code currently differs to much to make it feasible:
- `comma-dangle`, controls trailing commas in Objects and Arrays (among others).
- `object-curly-spacing`, controls spacing inside of Objects.
- `spaced-comment`, used to enforce spaces after `//` and `/*. (This is made difficult by the fact that there's still some usage of the old preprocessor left.)
Rules that I indend to look into possibly enabling in follow-ups, if it seems to make sense: `no-else-return`, `no-lonely-if`, `brace-style` with the `allowSingleLine` parameter removed.
Useful links:
- http://eslint.org/docs/user-guide/configuring
- http://eslint.org/docs/rules/
