Fixes http://www.pdf-archive.com/2013/09/30/file2/file2.pdf.
Note how it's not possible to show the various Popup Annotations in the above document.
To fix that, this patch lets the Popup inherit the flags of the parent, in the special case where the parent is `viewable` *and* the Popup is not.
In general, I don't think that a Popup must have the same flags set as the parent. However, it seems very strange to have a `viewable` parent annotation, and then not being able to view the Popup.
Annoyingly the PDF specification doesn't, as far as I can find, mention anything about how this case should be handled, but this patch seem consistent with the actual behaviour in Adobe Reader.
In the font in question, there are a couple of `topDict` entries that have invalid values (`0xF 0xF`, i.e. just eof markers without any actual numbers).
This causes the `parseFloatOperand` function, inside `CFFParser_parseDict`, to return `NaN`. Currently we pass this broken font onto the browser, which OTS unsurprisingly rejects.
Fixes https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1068432.
Note that in the PDF files provided by the reporter, this issue was limited to `Rect` arrays in AcroForm entries (which we currently don't support).
However, since a bad PDF generator could create this problem in *any* kind of annotation, the reduced test-case included here uses a simple LinkAnnotation instead.
Fixes 7115.
This patch adds a `getUnicodeForGlyph` helper function, which is used to recover Unicode values for non-standard glyph names.
Some PDF generators, e.g. Scribus PDF, use improper `uniXXXX` glyph names which breaks the glyph mapping. We can avoid this by converting them to "standard" glyph names instead.
Fixes https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1132849.
Fixes 6893.
Fixes 6894.
In the PDF file in question, some of the 'name' table entries have `record.length === 0`. This becomes problematic in the non-unicode case, since `font.getBytes(0)` will fetch the *entire* stream.
Given that OTS rejects 'name' entries larger than `2^16`, this thus explain the sanitizer errors.
Fixes 7020.
*A more robust solution for issue 6066.*
As a temporary work-around for (the upstream) [bug 1164199](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1164199), we parsed *all* images in the Firefox addon during a short time.
Doing so uncovered an issue with our image handling (see 6066), for JPEG images with a `DeviceGray` ColorSpace *and* `bpc !== 1` (bits per component).
As long as we let the browser handle image decoding in this case, this isn't going to be an issue, but I do think that we should proactively fix this to avoid future issues if we change where the images are decoded (in `jpg.js` vs in browser).
Also, we currently don't seem to have a test-case for that kind of image data.
Some bad PDF generators, in particular "Scribus PDF", duplicates resources *a lot* at various levels of the PDF files. This can lead to `PartialEvaluator_hasBlendModes` taking an unreasonable amount of time to complete.
The reason is that the current code is using `Dict_getAll`, which recursively dereferences *all* indirect objects, which can be really slow. This patch instead uses `Dict_getKeys`, and then manually looks up only the necessary indirect objects.
I've added the PDF file as a `load` test. The most important thing here is probably to ensure that the file remains available in the repo, and the comment should help reduced the chance of regressions. (Note that locally, the `load` test times out without this patch, but we cannot really assume that that always happens.)
Fixes 6961.
As part of the link cleanup in issue 6854, obtaining this file through the Internet Archive didn't work.
However, given that the file was added in order to test an issue with `CropBox/MediaBox`, a reduced test-case should do just fine instead.
Please refer to issue 1155, and PR 1212.
It seems to be fairly common for OCR software to include incomplete TrueType fonts, notable missing the "glyf" table, in PDF files. Since we currently reject such fonts, the result is that text-selection/copying is broken.
This patch contains a suggested approach to try and use these kind of broken fonts, by using existing code in `sanitizeGlyphLocations` to replace a missing "glyf" table with dummy data.
Fixes 4684.
Fixes 6007.
Fixes 6829.
The test case was changed in 1faca19021 because the original file was not available anymore. However, its hash was also changed, meaning that we do not test the intended version anymore.
This patch makes sure that we test the intented version by reverting to
the original hash and using a link, also pointing to the Internet
Archive, with the original file.
This test was disabled in PR 4732, because the file was no longer available. The motivation being that there were two other files which should be good replacements. However, one of those has since been replaced with a reduced test-case (which doesn't exercise the same code-path), and in the other one the error does not appear to be entirely identical.
Hence it seems reasonable to re-add the 'aboutstacks.pdf' test, since it was possible to find it on the Internet Archive (by searching using a different URL, compared to the current one).
Note that despite the new file having a different hash than the the current one, it does render *identically* and most importantly it uses *the same* JBIG2 functionality.
For reference, please see issue 3666 and PR 3738.
*This patch follows a similar idea as PR 5756.*
The patch is based on the nice debugging done by Brendan in the referenced issue 6782.
A better way to handle this, and similar issues, would probably be to completely ignore what the PDF file claims about font type/subtype, and just check the actual data. But until that kind of rewrite happens, this patch should help.
Fixes 6782.
When generating new references locally on Windows, after PR 6724, I get the following output:
```
WARNING: Unable to open file for reading "Error: ENOENT, open 'c:\Users\Jonas\Git\pdfjs\test\pdfs\issue_3694_reduced.pdf'".
Unable to verify the checksum for the files that are used for testing.
Please re-download the files, or adjust the MD5 checksum in the manifest for the files listed above.
```
Compared to the name of the file (`issue3694_reduced.pdf`), you see that the manifest entry has a superfluous underscore in the "file" entry.
Currently we're not applying Patterns for text, but only for graphics.
This patch is unfortunately not a complete solution, but rather a step on the way, since there are still some PDF files where the Patterns look more like a solid colour, rather than the intended gradient.
I've been unable to fix these issues completely, and I've not managed to determine if the remaining issues are caused either by the pattern code, the canvas code, or perhaps both.
However, given that even this simple patch improves the current situation quite a bit, I figured that it couldn't hurt to submit it as-is.
- Fixes 5804.
- Fixes 6130.
- Improves 3988 a lot, since the text is now visible. However, it looks like the text is *one* solid colour, instead of the correct gradient.
- Improves 5432, since the text is no longer gray. (This file also suffers from the same problem as the previous one.)
Most code for Popup annotations is already present for Text annotations.
This patch extracts the popup creation logic from the Text annotation
code so it can be reused for Popup annotations.
Not only does this add support for Popup annotations, the Text
annotation code is also considerably easier. If a `Popup` entry is
available for a Text annotation, it will not be more than an image. The
popup will be handled by the Popup annotation. However, it is also
possible for Text annotations to not have a separate Popup annotation,
in which case the Text annotation handles the popup creation itself.
This PDF file (see issue 4914) originally regressed in PR 4318, and was subsequently fixed in PR 4915.
I added the PDF file as a (linked) test-case in PR 6481, in an effort to prevent regressions. Since we at that time didn't have the necessary framework in place, in order to correctly test annotations, this almost regressed *again* in PR https://github.com/mozilla/pdf.js/pull/6672#issuecomment-158689392.
In that PDF file, some of the annotations are both printable and hidden, and should definitely *not* be visible on normal display. Hence this patch, which adds the `annotations` flag to the manifest in order to ensure that those annotations won't be rendered when `intent === 'display'`.
In `Font_checkAndRepair` we can decide that a font isn't TrueType, and instead parse it as CFF. In that case it's quite possible that the `fontMatrix` will be changed, and without calling `adjustWidths` we're failing to update the glyph widths correctly.
Fixes 5027.
Fixes 5084.
Fixes 6556.
Fixes https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1204903.
After PR 6590, `font.spaceWidth` is now called in more cases than before (in `PartialEvaluator_getTextContent`), which exposed an underlying issue with `IdentityToUnicodeMap_charCodeOf` throwing an error.
This breaks text-selection in some PDF files found in the wild, hence this patch replaces the `error` with an actual function instead (modelled after `IdentityCMap_charCodeOf`).
*This is a regression from PR 3424.*
The PDF file in the referenced issue is using `Type3` fonts. In one of those, the `/CharProcs` dictionary contains an entry with the name `/#`. Before the changes to `Lexer_getName` in PR 3424, we were allowing certain invalid `Name` patterns containing the NUMBER SIGN (#).
It's unfortunate that this has been broken for close to two and a half years before the bug surfaced, but it should at least indicate that this is not a widespread issue.
Fixes 6692.
This patch goes a bit further than issue 6612 requires, and replaces all kinds of whitespace with standard spaces.
When testing this locally, it actually seemed to slightly improve two existing test-cases (`tracemonkey-text` and `taro-text`).
Fixes 6612.
When I submitted PR 3576, I included a linked test-case. The reason was that I didn't know enough about the PDF format, in order to successfully create a reduced test-case.
Considering that the link points to a Dropbox, there's no guarantee that the PDF file will remain available, hence it seems worthwhile to replace the test-case.
*Note:* Since this is a `load` test, `makeref` won't be necessary.
The file (`lshort.pdf`) has changed a couple of times since the test was added, hence there's no guarantee that the current version accurately reflects the issues the test was added to check.
In this patch, I'm updating the link location to point to the *intended* file version (hosted on the "Internet Archive").
According to the PDF spec 5.3.2, a positive value means in horizontal,
that the next glyph is further to the left (so narrower), and in
vertical that it is further down (so wider).
This change fixes the way PDF.js has interpreted the value.
For (1, 0) cmaps, we have two different codepaths depending on whether the font has/hasn't got an encoding. But with (3, 1) cmaps we don't have a good fallback when the encoding is missing, hence this patch changes `readCmapTable` to only choose a (3, 1) cmap table if the font is non-symbolic *and* an encoding exists. Without this, we'll not be able to successfully create a working glyph map for some TrueType fonts with (3, 1) cmap tables.
Fixes 6410.
Fixes https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1200096.
The problematic font has a `format 2` cmap, which we've never supported properly. Prior to PR 2606, we were able to fallback to a working state, despite not having proper support for that cmap format.
Obviously the best/correct solution would be to implement actual support for more cmap formats[1]. However, I'm hoping that a simple patch will be OK for now, given that:
- `format 2` cmaps seem to be quite rare in practice, since this has been broken for 2.5 years before anyone noticed.
- Having a simple patch will make potential uplifts a lot easier.
[1] See the specification at https://developer.apple.com/fonts/TrueType-Reference-Manual/RM06/Chap6cmap.html
Re: PR 4731.
Since the URL points to the Internet Archive, I think that adding a linked test-case should be OK. (Also, it's difficult to create reduced, or even `unit`, tests that accurately captures the brokenness of real-world PDF files.)
*Please note:* Since this is a `load` test, `makeref`ing won't be needed.
Our current test coverage for vertical text is somewhat lacking, as evident from e.g. issue 6387. That regression could easily have been avoided if the `taro` test-case would have been an `eq` test, as well as an `text` test.
Currently we only attempt to test the *first* page, since `lastPage == 1`, but given that it's subsequently skipped we end up not testing anything.
*Note:* I've verified that the *second* page actually contains the kind of Colour space that the test was intended to check for.
This patch improves the detection of `xref` in files where it is followed by an arbitrary whitespace character (not just a line-breaking char).
It also adds a check for missing whitespace, e.g. `1 0 obj<<`, to speed up `readToken` for the PDF file in the referenced issue.
Finally, the patch also replaces a bunch of magic numbers with suitably named constants.
Fixes 5752.
Also improves 6243, but there are still issues.
The problem with the PDF files in the issue, besides the obviously broken XRef tables which we're able to recover from, is that many/most of the streams have Dictionaries where the `Length` entry is set to `0`. This causes us to return `NullStream`, instead of the appropriate one in `Parser_makeFilter`.
Fixes 6360.
Short story: somebody got lost in two different indices. pi is an index in the stream and is explained on page 198 of the 32000-spec (however 1-based there), and ps is an index to something in PDF.js. I used the code from flag 0 (which works) to understand which is which. It is also important to understand that for flags 1,2 and 3, the stream is always assigned to the same coordinates and colors. What changes is which "old" coordinates and colors are assigned to what is "missing" in the stream. This is why for these flags, the code is identical except for the assignments in the first "row".
When the parser finds a stream, it retrieves the Length from the stream
dictionary and advances the lexer to the offset as specified in Length.
If this Length is incorrect, the lexer could end up anywhere.
When the lexer gets in an invalid state, it could throw errors. For
example, in issue 6108, the lexer ends up inside the stream data. This
stream has the ASCIIHexDecode filter, so all characters are made up from
ASCII characters, and the lexer interprets it as a command token. Tokens
cannot be longer than 127 bytes, so eventually 128 bytes are consumed
and the lexer throws "Command token too long" error.
Another possible error is "Illegal character: 41" when the lexer happens
to end up at a ')' due to the length mismatch.
These problems are solved by catching lexer errors and recovering the
parser via the existing stream length detection branch.
Xref offsets are relative to the start of the PDF data, not to the start
of the PDF file. This is clear if you look at the other code:
- In the XRef's readXRefTable and processXRefTable methods of XRef, the
offset of a xref entry is set to the bytes as given by a PDF file.
These values are always relative to the start of the PDF file (%PDF-).
- The XRef's readXRef method adds the start offset of the stream to
Xref entry's offset: "stream.pos = startXRef + stream.start".
Clearly, this line assumes that the entry offset excludes the start
offset.
However, when the PDF is parsed in recovery mode, the xref table is
filled with entries whose offset is relative to the start of the stream
rather than the PDF file. This is incorrect, and the fix is to subtract
the start offset of the stream from the entry's byte offset.
The manually created PDF file serves as a regression test. It is a valid
PDF, except:
- The integer to point to the start of the xref table and the %%EOF
trailer are missing. This will activate recovery mode in PDF.js
- Some junk was added before the start of the PDF file. This exposes the
bad offset bug.
This patch adds:
- Unit tests for the annotation border style class
- Regression test (self-made) for the annotation border style class
- Documentation generation using JSDoc
Fixes 6068.
The most notable issue with the font in question is that the `differences` array contains lots of strange entries (of the type `uniXXXX`, instead of proper glyph names).
For passwords where the encoding already is correct, the conversion is a no-op.
Also, since `encodeURIComponent` might throw, we need to make sure that we handle that case too.
Fixes 6010.
Fixes https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1050040.
With this patch the file is completely readable, but given that the font is broken enough to be rejected by OTS the rendering differs slightly from Adobe Reader.
*Note:* the PDF file is sufficiently broken that even Adobe Reader complains about the font, *and* also about another more general issue.
Prior to PR 4259, we *incorrectly* ignored `toUnicode` for Type3 fonts. Since we now handle that correctly, this patch adds a `text` test-case to prevent regressions.
According to practical experiments, falling back to "Helvetica" when we encounter a non-embedded "[Century Gothic](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Century_Gothic)" `CIDFontType2` font seems to work well.
(Also, the section on Wikipedia about "Printer ink usage" *might* provide some anecdotal evidence that Century Gothic is a fairly standard sans-serif font.)
Obviously this patch doesn't make "Century Gothic" fonts render perfectly, as is often the case with non-embedded fonts, but all the text is now legible in the referenced issues.
Fixes 4722.
Fixes https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=879561.
When submitting PR 5276 there wasn't a good PDF file to include in the test suite. However, with https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1108753, we now have a better source for a test file, hence this patch.
The files issue3115.pdf and issue2337.pdf are identical, the only difference being that the first one is an `eq` test and the second one a `load` test. Hence there is no reason to keep the `load` test, since it's just a subset of the `eq` test.
PR 4259 fixed a large number of font bugs, but none of those where added as test-cases. This was, in my opinion, unfortunate since it increases the risk of regressions in the future when other font bugs are fixed.
This PR simply adds a few more test-cases, to improve our test coverage somewhat.
