Given that browsers will reject padding values smaller than zero (which may be caused by limited numerical precision during calculations in the `expand` code), it makes no sense to include those when expanding the `textDiv`s.
With the changes to the `StreamType`/`FontType` "enums" in PR 11029, one unfortunate result is that `getStats` now *always* returns empty Arrays. Something that everyone, myself included, apparently missed is that you obviously cannot index an Array with Strings :-)
I wrongly assumed that the unit-tests would catch any bugs, but they apparently suffered from the same issue as the code in `src/core/`.
Another possible option could perhaps be to use `Set`s, rather than objects, but that will require larger changes since `LoopbackPort` (in `src/display/api.js`) doesn't support them.
There's a number of spots in the current code, and tests, where `cancel` methods are not called with appropriate arguments (leading to Promises not being rejected with Errors as intended).
In some cases the cancel `reason` is implicitly set to `undefined`, and in others the cancel `reason` is just a plain String. To address this inconsistency, the patch changes things such that cancelling is done with `AbortException`s everywhere instead.
Note that, in the old code, there was a code-path which could prevent this from happening thus affecting future cleanup.
Furthermore, ensure that we'll always attempt to cleanup when handling the 'PageError' message, similar to the code in e.g. the `PDFPageProxy._renderPageChunk` method.
The `receivingOperatorList` property is currently tracked *twice* in the rendering code, both directly and inversely through the `intentState.operatorList.lastChunk` boolean. This type of double bookkeeping is never a good idea, since it's just too easy for the properties to accidentally fall out of sync.
In this case there's even a `cleanup`-related bug caused by this, which means that `PDFPageProxy._tryCleanup` will never be able to discard any data if there's an error on the worker-thread (as handled through the 'PageError' message).
Hence the simplest solution seems, at least to me, to update `PDFPageProxy._tryCleanup` to replace the `intentState.receivingOperatorList` check with a `!intentState.operatorList.lastChunk` check and completely remove the former property.
Given that `cleanupAfterRender` is already set for large images, when handling 'obj' messages, this patch *should* thus be safe in general (since otherwise there ought be existing bugs related to cleanup and printing).
Calling `someArray = []` will create a new Array, which seems completely unnecessary when it's sufficient to just call `someArray.length = 0` to achieve the same effect.
Even though I cannot imagine these particular cases having any noticeable performance impact, similar changes were made in `core/` code years ago since it's apparently more efficient memory wise.
This includes the information in the core and display layers. The
date parsing logic from the document properties is rewritten according
to the specification and now includes unit tests.
Moreover, missing unit tests for the color of a popup annotation have
been added.
Finally the styling of the popup is changed slightly to make the text a
bit smaller (it's currently quite large in comparison to other viewers)
and to make the drop shadow a bit more subtle. The former is done to be
able to easily include the modification date in the popup similar to how
other viewers do this.
While PR 10714 did address the `disableRange=true` case, it also managed to "break" the `disableStream=true` case instead since the indeterminate loadingBar is now displayed when it shouldn't; sorry about that!
The solution is simple enough though, don't attempt to fallback to `_fullRequestReader.onProgress` when handling "incomplete" loading information.
Please see the specification, https://www.adobe.com/content/dam/acom/en/devnet/acrobat/pdfs/PDF32000_2008.pdf#M11.9.12864.1Heading.71.Viewer.Preferences
Furthermore, note that this patch *only* adds API support and unit-tests but does not attempt to integrate e.g. the `ViewerPreferences -> Direction` property into the viewer (which would be necessary to address issue 10736).
The reason for this is that it's not entirely clear to me exactly if/how that could be implemented; e.g. would it be as simple as setting the `dir` attribute on the `viewerContainer` DOM element, or will it be more complicated?
There's also the question of how the `ViewerPreferences -> Direction` value interacts with the `PageMode`, and this will generally require a fair bit of manual testing. Since the direction of the *entire* viewer depends on the browser locale, there's also a somewhat open question regarding what default value to use for different locales.
Finally, if the viewer supports `ViewerPreferences -> Direction` then I'm assuming that it will be necessary to allow users to override the default value, which will require (most likely) new `SecondaryToolbar` buttons and icons for those etc.
Hence this patch only lays the necessary foundation for eventually addressing issue 10736, but defers the actual implementation until later. (Time permitting, I'll try to look into the viewer part later.)
*Please note:* This patch purposely ignores `src/display/network.js`, since its support for progressive reading depends on the non-standard `moz-chunked-arraybuffer` responseType which is currently in the process of being removed.
The file `test/pdfs/annotation-caret-ink.pdf` is already available in
the repository as a reference test for this since I supplied it for
another patch that implemented ink annotations.
This mirrors the canvas implementation where we ignore these operators.
This avoids console spam regarding unimplemented operators we're not
interested in.
For the Tracemonkey paper, we're now down to one warning about tiling
patterns which is in fact a valid one.
In particular, this should reduce intermediate string creation by using
template strings and reduce variable lookup times by removing unneeded
variables and caching `this.current` in more places.
With PR 10675 having fixed the completely broken `disableRange=true` setting in the Firefox version of PDF.js, I couldn't help but noticing that loading progress is never reported properly in that case.
Currently loading progress is only reported for the `rangeProgress` chrome-event, which obviously isn't dispatched with `disableRange=true` set. However, the `progressiveRead` chrome-event includes loading progress as well, but this information isn't being used in any way.
Furthermore, the `PDFDataRangeTransport.onDataProgress` method wasn't able to handle "complete" loading information, and neither was `PDFDataTransportStream._onProgress` since that method would only ever attempt to report it through a RangeReader (which won't exist when `disableRange=true` is set).
