This patch improves the code structure of the annotation code.
- Create the annotation border style object in the `setBorderStyle` method instead of in the constructor. The behavior is the same as the `setBorderStyle` method is always called, thus a border style object is still always available.
- Put all data object manipulation lines in one block in the constructor. This improves readability and maintainability as it is more visible which properties are exposed.
- Simplify `appendToOperatorList` by removing the promise capability and removing an unused parameter.
- Remove some unnecessary newlines/spaces.
*This is a regression from PR 3424.*
The PDF file in the referenced issue is using `Type3` fonts. In one of those, the `/CharProcs` dictionary contains an entry with the name `/#`. Before the changes to `Lexer_getName` in PR 3424, we were allowing certain invalid `Name` patterns containing the NUMBER SIGN (#).
It's unfortunate that this has been broken for close to two and a half years before the bug surfaced, but it should at least indicate that this is not a widespread issue.
Fixes 6692.
This patch goes a bit further than issue 6612 requires, and replaces all kinds of whitespace with standard spaces.
When testing this locally, it actually seemed to slightly improve two existing test-cases (`tracemonkey-text` and `taro-text`).
Fixes 6612.
Currently `getAnnotations` will *only* fetch annotations that are either `viewable` or `printable`. This is "hidden" inside the `core.js` file, meaning that API consumers might be confused as to why they are not recieving *all* the annotations present for a page.
I thus think that the API should, by default, return *all* available annotations unless specifically told otherwise. In e.g. the default viewer, we obviously only want to display annotations that are `viewable`, hence this patch adds an `intent` parameter to `getAnnotations` that makes it possible to decide if only `viewable` or `printable` annotations should be fetched.
This patch makes it possible to set and get all possible flags that the PDF specification defines. Even though we do not support all possible annotation types and not all possible annotation flags yet, this general framework makes it easy to access all flags for each annotation such that annotation type implementations can use this information.
We add constants for all possible annotation flags such that we do not need to hardcode the flags in the code anymore. The `isViewable()` and `isPrintable()` methods are now easier to read. Additionally, unit tests have been added to ensure correct behavior.
This is another part of #5218.
I received multiple reports about the following cryptic error in the
Chrome extension when the user tried to open a local file:
> PDF.js v1.1.527 (build: 2096a2a)
> Message: Cannot read property 'Symbol(Symbol.iterator)' of null
This error most likely originated from core/stream.js:
function Stream(arrayBuffer, start, length, dict) {
this.bytes = (arrayBuffer instanceof Uint8Array ?
arrayBuffer : new Uint8Array(arrayBuffer));
^^^^^^^^^^^
`arrayBuffer` is `null`, and that in turn is caused by the fact that
for non-existing files, there is no data. I've applied two fixes:
1. Never call onDone with a void buffer, but call the error handler
instead.
2. Show a sensible error message for local files with status = 0.
In the `RenderPageRequest` handler in `worker.js`, we attempt to print an `info` message containing the rendering time and the length of the operator list. The latter is currently broken (and has been for quite some time), since the `length` of an `OperatorList` is reset when flushing occurs.
This patch attempts to rectify this, by adding a getter which keeps track of the total length.
`operatorList.addOp` adds the arguments to the list which is then
passed as-is by postMessage to the main thread. But since we don't
parse these operations, they are raw PDF objects and may therefore
cause a serialization error.
This is a conservative patch, and only affects operators which are
known to be unsupported. We should ignore all unknown operators,
but I haven't really looked into the consequences of doing that.
Fixes#6549
In PR 6485 I somehow missed to account for the case where `xref` is undefined. Since a dictonary can be initialized without providing a reference to an `xref` instance, `Dict_getArray` can thus fail without this added check.
According to the PDF spec 5.3.2, a positive value means in horizontal,
that the next glyph is further to the left (so narrower), and in
vertical that it is further down (so wider).
This change fixes the way PDF.js has interpreted the value.
This patch adjusts `get fingerprint` to also check that the `/ID` entry contains (non-empty) strings, to prevent more possible failures when loading corrupt PDF files (follow-up to PR 5602).
Note that I've not actually encountered such a PDF file in the wild. However given that `stringToBytes` will assert that the input is a string, and that we'll thus fail to load a document unless `get fingerprint` succeeds, making this more robust seems like a good idea to me.
For (1, 0) cmaps, we have two different codepaths depending on whether the font has/hasn't got an encoding. But with (3, 1) cmaps we don't have a good fallback when the encoding is missing, hence this patch changes `readCmapTable` to only choose a (3, 1) cmap table if the font is non-symbolic *and* an encoding exists. Without this, we'll not be able to successfully create a working glyph map for some TrueType fonts with (3, 1) cmap tables.
Fixes 6410.
This code was added in PR 1214, but was made obsolete by PRs 1488/1493. Prior to the latter ones, `Dict_get` retured the raw objects. However, afterwards (and currently) `Dict_get` now resolves indirect objects, which makes `Parser_fetchIfRef` redundant.
*Potential risks with this patch:*
This patch passes all tests locally, but there's a *small* possibility that it could break some weird PDF files.
In the current code, wrapping `Dict_get` inside `Parser_fetchIfRef` will potentially mean two back-to-back call of `XRef_fetch`, if a reference points directly to another reference. I'm not sure if this can actually happen in practice, and I'd think that if that were the case we'd already have run into it elsewhere in the code-base, given that `Parser` is the only place where we try to "double" resolve references.