Currently for explicit destinations, compared to named destinations, we manually try to build a hash that often times is a quite poor representation of the *actual* destination. (Currently this only, kind of, works for `\XYZ` destinations.)
For PDF files using explicit destinations, this can make it difficult/impossible to obtain a link to a specific section of the document through the URL.
Note that in practice most PDF files, especially newer ones, use named destinations and these are thus unnaffected by this patch.
This patch also fixes an existing issue in `PDFLinkService_getDestinationHash`, where a named destination consisting of only a number would not be handled correctly.
With the added, and already existing, type checks in place for destinations, I really don't think that this patch exposes any "sensitive" internal destination code not already accessible through normal hash parameters.
*Please note:* Just trying to improve the algorithm that generates the hash is unfortunately not possible in general, since there are a number of cases where it will simply never work well.
- First of all, note that `getDestinationHash` currently relies on the `_pagesRefCache`, hence it's possible that the hash returned is empty during e.g. ranged/streamed loading of a PDF file.
- Second of all, the currently computed hash is actually dependent on the document rotation. With named destinations, the fetched internal destination array is rotational invariant (as it should be), but this will not hold in general for the hash. We can easily avoid this issue by using a stringified destination array.
- Third of all, note that according to the PDF specification[1], `GoToR` destinations may actually contain explicit destination arrays. Since we cannot really construct a hash in `annotation.js`, we currently have no good way to support those. Even though this case seems *very* rare in practice (I've not actually seen such a PDF file), it's in the specification, and this patch allows us to support that for "free".
---
[1] http://www.adobe.com/content/dam/Adobe/en/devnet/acrobat/pdfs/PDF32000_2008.pdf#G11.1951685
Currently the `getPageIndex` method will happily return `0`, even if the `Ref` parameter doesn't actually point to a proper /Page dictionary.
Having the API trust that the consumer is doing the right thing seems error-prone, hence this patch which adds a check for this case.
Given that the `Catalog_getPageIndex` method isn't used in any hot part of the codebase, this extra check shouldn't be a problem.
(Note: in the standard viewer, it is only ever used from `PDFLinkService_navigateTo` if a destination needs to be resolved during document loading, which isn't common enough to be an issue IMHO.)
These have been found using `gulp lint` in combination with the `unused:
true` parameter for JSHint. Unfortunately there are too many false
positives to enable this feature, but now that most globals have been
removed because of the conversion to UMD the results are much more
useful than before.
This was only ever useful for the Opera extension because the API
requires a whitelisted extension ID. Opera ditched PDF.js from their
extension gallery, so we don't need to keep this in the tree.
I've seen the above error occasionally when the scale is updated many times in quick succession, but I've not been able to pinpoint exactly why it happens.
Since the error isn't caught, this means that the `pageViewDrawCallback` function doesn't run to completion.
Unfortunately, given the very intermittent nature of the issue, I haven't got any good STR for reliably reproducing this issue. However, I hope that this patch can be accepted anyway, since it's simple and should help prevent unnecessary errors.
In the font in question, there are a couple of `topDict` entries that have invalid values (`0xF 0xF`, i.e. just eof markers without any actual numbers).
This causes the `parseFloatOperand` function, inside `CFFParser_parseDict`, to return `NaN`. Currently we pass this broken font onto the browser, which OTS unsurprisingly rejects.
Fixes https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1068432.
As evident from e.g. PRs 6485 and 7118, some bad PDF generators unfortunately create Arrays where *some* elements are indirect objects (i.e. `Ref`s). This seems to mostly affect Arrays that contain numbers, such as e.g. `Matrix/FontMatrix/BBox/FontBBox/Rect/Color/...`, and has manifested itself in PDF files that fail to render correctly (some elements are missing).
The problem in both the cases above, besides broken rendering, was that there were *no* errors/warnings that indicated what the problem was, making it difficult to pinpoint the issue.
Hence this patch, where I've audited all usages of `Dict_get` in `src/core/` files, and replaced it with `Dict_getArray` where appropriate to try and prevent unnecessary future bugs.
Re: issue 7261.
Given the we have `gulp fonttest`, which tests the `fonts.js` functionality at a higher level, and that we have *a lot* of font specific reference tests, I'm not convinced that we *also* need unit-tests for it.
We're already, since quite some time, using the standard Fullscreen API provided that it's available in the browser. The warning is only caused by the code that checks if the Fullscreen API is supported.
This patch uses a simple preprocessor tag to avoid the warning, since I'm assuming that in general, we want to try and remain backwards compatible with the prefixed versions of the Fullscreen API.
Fixes 7270.
