Currently these methods are only used from the respective `reset` methods, and from `{BaseViewer, PDFThumbnailViewer}._cancelRendering` which only runs when the active document is closed.
This patch changes `{PDFPageView, PDFThumbnailView}.cancelRendering` to *only* cancel any pending rendering operations, and doesn't attempt to reset e.g. the `renderingState`, since that causes visual glitches (duplicated canvases in the viewer) when called directly.
Furthermore, unless you "know" what you're doing, the `{PDFPageView, PDFThumbnailView}.reset` methods are what *should* normally be used instead.
If, as PR 10368 suggests, more parameters should be added to `getViewport` I think that it would be a mistake to not change the signature *first* to avoid needlessly unwieldy call-sites.
To not break any existing code and third-party use-cases, this is obviously implemented with a deprecation warning *and* with a working fallback[1] for the old method signature.
---
[1] This is limited to `GENERIC` builds, which should be sufficient.
The code responsible for highlighting/scrolling thumbnails is quite old, and parts of it hasn't really changed much over time.
In particular, the `scrollThumbnailIntoView` method is currently using `document.querySelector` in order to find both the new/current thumbnail element. This seems totally unnessary, since we can easily keep track of the current thumbnail (similar to the "regular" viewer) and thus avoid unnecessary DOM look-ups.
Furthermore, note how the `PDFThumbnailView` constructor is currently highlighting the *first* thumbnail. This is yet another leftover from older viewer code, which we can now remove and instead take care of in `PDFThumbnailViewer.setDocument`.
Given that `PDFThumbnailView` does not, nor should it, have any concept of which thumbnail is currently selected, this change also improves the general structure of this code a tiny bit.
This patch intends to simplify future ES6 refactoring of the thumbnail code, since the current code isn't going to work well together with proper `Class`es.
Also replaces `var` with `let` in code that's touched in the patch. Please note that this should be completely safe, for two separate reasons, since trying to access let in a scope where it's not defined is first of all a runtime error and second of all an ESLint error (thanks to the `no-undef` rule).
In various viewer files, there's a number of cases where we basically duplicate the functionality of `createPromiseCapability` manually.
As far as I can tell, a couple of these cases have existed for a very long time, and notable even before the `createPromiseCapability` utility function existed.
Also, since we can write ES6 code now, the patch also replaces a couple of `bind` usages with arrow functions in code that's touched in the patch.
Note that as discussed on IRC, this makes the viewer slightly slower to load *only* in `gulp server` mode, however the difference seem slight enough that I think it will be fine.
*This is a follow-up to PRs 6299 and 6441.*
The patch also adds an option to `PDFThumbnailView`, that disables the canvas-to-image conversion entirely, which might be useful in the context of issue 7026.
The `hasImage` property is a left-over from older thumbnail code, and has been made obsolete by `renderingState`.
Having two different properties tracking (basically) the same state is asking for trouble, since it's very easy to forget to update one of them, with annoying bugs as the result.
*Follow-up to PR 6299.*
This patch reduces unnecessary code duplication for the `canvas` to `image` conversion. It also does a bit of re-ordering (and adds new lines) in `_getPageDrawContext`, since that function currently is a bit hard to read.
Reuse the existing getOutputScale() machinery to render and/or rescale
thumbnail images to the native display resolution. Fixes blurry thumbnails on
HiDPI displays making it a lot easier to make out the content.
This includes an optimization to zero the height and width of existing thumbnail canvases, when they are removed and recreated during rotation of the document. (Credit goes to nnethercote, who initially found this in PR 4920.)
