This changes the `transformOrigin` calculations in `AnnotationElement._createContainer` and `PopupAnnotationElement.render`, to ensure that e.g. the clickable area of annotations and/or popups are both positioned correctly.
The problem occurs for *negative* values, since they're not negated correctly because of how the `transformOrigin` strings were build; see issue 12406 for a more in-depth explanation. Previously, for negative values, the `transformOrigin` strings would thus be ignored since they're not valid.
This patch contains a possible approach for fixing issue 12294, which compared to other PRs is purposely limited to the affected `WidgetAnnotation` code.
As mentioned elsewhere, considering that we're (at least for now) trying to fix *one specific* case, I think that we should avoid modifying the `Dict` primitive[1] and/or avoid a solution that (indirectly) modifies an existing `Dict`-instance[2].
This patch simply fixes the issue at hand, since that seems easiest for now, and I'd suggest that we worry about a more general approach if/when that actually becomes necessary.
Hence the solution implemented here, for `WidgetAnnotation`, is to simply use a combination of the local *and* AcroForm /DR resources during OperatorList-parsing to ensure that things work correctly regardless of where a particular /Font resource is found.
For saving of form-data, on the other hand, we want to avoid increasing the file-size unnecessarily and need to be smarter than just merging all of the available resources. To achive this, a new `WidgetAnnotation._getSaveFieldResources` method will when necessary produce a combined resources `Dict` with only the minimum amount of data from the AcroForm /DR resources included.
---
[1] You want to avoid anything that could cause the general `Dict` implementation to become slower, or more complex, just for handling an edge-case in my opinion.
[2] If an existing `Dict`-instance is modified unexpectedly, that could very easily lead to problems elsewhere since e.g. `Dict`-instances created during parsing are not expected to be changed.
This will allow `makeref` to run "successfully" on the bots, since in the current state testing/makeref is just overall broken.
Obviously we still need to figure what's causing the intermittent failures, and fix them, but let's at least unblock things for now; see issue 12371.
* Move display/xml_parser.js in shared to use it in worker
* Save form data in XFA datasets when pdf is a mix of acroforms and xfa
Co-authored-by: Brendan Dahl <brendan.dahl@gmail.com>
This allows for merging of dictionaries one level deeper than previously. This could be useful e.g. for /Resources dictionaries, where you want to e.g. merge their respective /Font dictionaries (and other) together rather than picking just the first one.
In issue 12120, the font has a 1,0 cmap and is marked symbolic which
according to the spec means we should directly use the cmap instead of
the extra steps that are defined in 9.6.6.4.
However, just fixing that caused bug 1057544 to break. The font in bug
1057544 has a 0,1 cmap (Unicode 1.1) which we were not using, but is
easy to support. We're also easily able to support some of the other
unicode cmaps, so I added those as well.
There was also a second issue with bug 1057544, the cmap doesn't have
a mapping for the "quoteright" glyph, but it is defined in the post
table. To handle this, I've moved post table as a fallback for any
font that has an encoding.
Good form type detection is important to get reliable telemetry and to
only show the fallback bar if a form cannot be filled out by the user.
PDF.js only supports AcroForm data, so XFA data is explicitly unsupported
(tracked in issue #2373). However, the previous form type detection
couldn't separate AcroForm and XFA well enough, causing form type
telemetry to be incorrect sometimes and the fallback bar to be shown for
forms that could in fact be filled out by the user.
The solution in this commit is found by studying the specification and
the form documents that are available to us. In a nutshell the rules are:
- There is XFA data if the `XFA` entry is a non-empty array or stream.
- There is AcroForm data if the `Fields` entry is a non-empty array and
it doesn't consist of only document signatures.
The document signatures part was not handled in the old code, causing a
document with only XFA data to also be marked as having AcroForm data.
Moreover, the old code didn't check all the data types.
Now that AcroForm and XFA can be distinguished, the viewer is configured
to only show the fallback bar for documents that only have XFA data. If
a document also has AcroForm data, the viewer can use that to render the
form. We have not found documents where the XFA data was necessary in
that case.
Finally, we include unit tests to ensure that all cases are covered and
move the form type detection out of the `parse` function so that it's
only executed if the document information is actually requested
(potentially making initial parsing a tiny bit faster).
The `AcroForm` entry is part of the catalog, not of the document, so its
logic should be placed there instead. The document should look in the
catalog to fetch it, and not have knowledge of `catDict`, which is a
member internal to the catalog.
Moreover, make the AcroForm member private on the document instance. It's
only used internally and was also never intended to be public. For users
it's exposed by the `getMetadata` API endpoint as `IsAcroFormPresent`.
Only a boolean is exposed, so we now also only store the boolean on the
document instance.
Finally, the annotation code needs access to the full AcroForm
dictionary, so it's updated to fetch the data from the catalog instead
of the document that now only holds the boolean.
In addition to the unit tests these reference tests make sure that this
document, that triggered some edge cases in our code, can be rendered
and printed successfully now.
The down appearance (`D`) is optional and not available in the document
from #12233, so the checkboxes are never saved/printed as checked
because the checked appearance is based on the export value that is
missing because the `D` entry is not available.
Instead, we should use the normal appearance (`N`) since that one is
required and therefore always available.
Finally, the /Off appearance is optional according to section 12.7.4.2.3
of the specification, so that needs to be taken into account to match
the specification and to fix reference test failures for the
`annotation-button-widget-print` test. That is a file that doesn't
specify an /Off appearance in the normal appearance dictionary.
The helper method `_decodeFormValue` is used to ensure that it happens
in one place. Note that form values are field values, display values
and export values.
The specification states that the field value is `null` if no item is
selected and we didn't handle this case properly. Even though this did
not break the rendering because we always convert the value to an array
and the `includes` check in the display layer would simply not match,
the field value would be `[null]` which is not expected and strange from
an API perspective.
This commit fixes that by ensuring that we return an empty array in
case the field value is `null`. The API therefore still always gives an
array for the field value, but now the code is more specific so that the
value is either an empty array or an array of strings.
This commit follows the same pattern as another unit test in this file
and both reduces existing and future code duplication (since the next
commit will extend this test with an additional input).
This commit includes support for rendering pages in printing mode,
which, when combined with annotation storage data, is useful for testing
if form data is correctly rendered onto the printed canvas.
This is *similar* to the existing transfer function support for SMasks, but extended to simple image data.
Please note that the extra amount of data now being sent to the worker-thread, for affected /ExtGState entries, is limited to *at most* 4 `Uint8Array`s each with a length of 256 elements.
Refer to https://www.adobe.com/content/dam/acom/en/devnet/acrobat/pdfs/PDF32000_2008.pdf#G9.1658137 for additional details.
Some fonts have loca tables that aren't sorted or use 0 as an offset to
signal a missing glyph. This fixes the bad loca tables by sorting them
and then rewriting the loca table and potentially re-ordering the glyf
table to match.
Fixes#11131 and bug 1650302.
