The `MessageHandler`-implementation already handles either of these callbacks being undefined, hence there's no particular reason (as far as I can tell) to add no-op functions here.
Also, in a couple of `MessageHandler`-methods, utilize an already existing local variable more.
- aims to fix https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1720179
- in some pdfs the XFA array in AcroForm dictionary doesn't contain an entry for 'datasets' (which contains saved data), so basically this patch allows to overwrite the AcroForm dictionary with an updated XFA array when doing an incremental update.
*This patch is very similar to the recently fixed `renderInteractiveForms`-options, see PR 13867.*
As far as I can tell, this *subtle* bug has existed ever since `AnnotationStorage`-support was first added in PR 12106 (a little over a year ago).
The value of the `includeAnnotationStorage`-option, as passed to the `PDFPageProxy.render` method, will (potentially) affect the size/content of the operatorList that's returned from the worker (for documents with forms).
Given that operatorLists will generally, unless they contain huge images, be cached in the API, repeated `PDFPageProxy.render` calls where the form-data has been changed by the user in between, can thus *wrongly* return a cached operatorList.
In the viewer we're only using the `includeAnnotationStorage`-option when printing, which is probably why this has gone unnoticed for so long. Note that we, for performance reasons, don't cache printing-operatorLists in the API.
However, there's nothing stopping an API-user from using the `includeAnnotationStorage`-option during "normal" rendering, which could thus result in *subtle* (and difficult to understand) rendering bugs.
In order to handle this, we need to know if the `AnnotationStorage`-instance has been updated since the last `PDFPageProxy.render` call. The most "correct" solution would obviously be to create a hash of the `AnnotationStorage` contents, however that would require adding a bunch of code, complexity, and runtime overhead.
Given that operatorList caching in the API doesn't have to be perfect[1], but only have to avoid *false* cache-hits, we can simplify things significantly be only keeping track of the last time that the `AnnotationStorage`-data was modified.
*Please note:* While working on this patch, I also noticed that the `renderInteractiveForms`- and `includeAnnotationStorage`-options in the `PDFPageProxy.render` method are mutually exclusive.[2]
Given that the various Annotation-related options in `PDFPageProxy.render` have been added at different times, this has unfortunately led to the current "messy" situation.[3]
---
[1] Note how we're already not caching operatorLists for pages with *huge* images, in order to save memory, hence there's no guarantee that operatorLists will always be cached.
[2] Setting both to `true` will result in undefined behaviour, since trying to insert `AnnotationStorage`-values into fields that are being excluded from the operatorList-building will obviously not work, which isn't at all clear from the documentation.
[3] My intention is to try and fix this in a follow-up PR, and I've got a WIP patch locally, however it will result in a number of API-observable changes.
The value of the `renderInteractiveForms` parameter, as passed to the `PDFPageProxy.render` method, will (potentially) affect the size/content of the operatorList that's returned from the worker (for documents with forms).
Given that operatorLists will generally, unless they contain huge images, be cached in the API, repeated `PDFPageProxy.render` calls that *only* change the `renderInteractiveForms` parameter can thus return an incorrect operatorList.
As far as I can tell, this *subtle* bug has existed ever since `renderInteractiveForms`-support was first added in PR 7633 (which is almost five years ago).
With the previous patch, fixing this is now really simple by "encoding" the `renderInteractiveForms` parameter in the *internal* renderingIntent handling.
The PDF.js API has only ever supported accessing the original file ID, however the second one that (should) exist in *modified* documents have thus far been completely inaccessible through the API.
That seems like a simple oversight, caused e.g. by the viewer not needing it, since it really shouldn't hurt to provide API-users with the ability to check if a PDF document has been modified since its creation.[1]
Please refer to https://www.adobe.com/content/dam/acom/en/devnet/pdf/pdfs/PDF32000_2008.pdf#G13.2261661 for additional information.
For an example of how to update existing code to use the new API, please see the changes in the `web/app.js` file included in this patch.
*Please note:* While I'm not sure if we'll ever be able to remove the old `PDFDocumentProxy.fingerprint` getter, given that it's existed since "forever", that probably isn't a big deal given that it's now limited to only `GENERIC`-builds.
---
[1] Although this obviously depends on the PDF software following the specification, by updating the second file ID as intended.
- when binding (after parsing) we get a map between some template nodes and some data nodes;
- so set user data in input handlers in using data node uids in the annotation storage;
- to save the form, just put the value we have in the storage in the correct data nodes, serialize the xml as a string and then write the string at the end of the pdf using src/core/writer.js;
- fix few bugs around data bindings:
- the "Off" issue in Bug 1716980.
- some containers doesn't always have their 2 dimensions and those dimensions re based on contents;
- so in order to measure text, we must get the glyph widths (for the xfa fonts) before starting the layout;
- implement a word-wrap algorithm;
- handle font change during text layout.
This patch uses the new option added in PR 12726 to *also* allow fetching binary CMap data directly in the worker-thread in browsers.
Given that these changes remove the need to transfer data between threads for the default (browser) use-case, we can also revert the changes in PR 11118 since that simplifies the overall implementation.
- the only goal of this patch is to be able to get synchronously the fake html when printing from firefox:
- in order to print we need to inject some html in beforeprint callback but we cannot block in waiting for all the pages.
- from a memory point of view: it doesn't change anything since the fake HTML is deleted in the worker;
- this way we don't break any assumptions.
Using `for...of` is a modern and generally much nicer pattern, since it gets rid of unnecessary callback-functions. (In a couple of spots, a "regular" `for` loop had to be used.)
First of all, while it should be very unlikely that the /ID-entry is an *indirect* object, note how we're using `Dict.get` when parsing it e.g. in `PDFDocument.fingerprint`. Hence we definitely should be consistent here, since if the /ID-entry is an *indirect* object the existing code in `src/core/writer.js` would already fail.
Secondly, to fix the referenced issue, we also need to check that the /ID-entry actually is an Array before attempting to access its contents in `src/core/writer.js`.
*Drive-by change:* In the `xrefInfo` object passed to the `incrementalUpdate` function, re-name the `encrypt` property to `encryptRef` since its data is fetched using `Dict.getRaw` (given the names of the other properties fetched similarly).
- Use `PDFManager.ensureDoc`, rather than `PDFManager.ensure`, in a couple of spots in the code. If there exists a short-hand format, we should obviously use it whenever possible.
- Fix a unit-test helper, to account for the previous changes. (Also, converts a function to be `async` instead.)
- Add one more exists-check in `PDFDocument.loadXfaFonts`, which I missed to suggest in PR 13146, to prevent any possible errors if the method is ever called in a situation where it shouldn't be.
Also, print a warning if the actual font-loading fails since that could help future debugging. (Finally, reduce overall indentation in the loop.)
- Slightly unrelated, but make a small tweak of a comment in `src/core/fonts.js` to reduce possible confusion.
- Different fonts can be used in xfa and some of them are embedded in the pdf.
- Load all the fonts in window.document.
Update src/core/document.js
Co-authored-by: Jonas Jenwald <jonas.jenwald@gmail.com>
Update src/core/worker.js
Co-authored-by: Jonas Jenwald <jonas.jenwald@gmail.com>
Similar to all other data accesses, note e.g. the "GetDocJSActions" handler just above, we need to ensure that a `MissingDataException` isn't propagated to the main-thread if this data is accessed while the PDF document is still loading.
It's obviously (a bit) more efficient to return early in `Page.getStructTree`, rather than trying to first "parse" an *empty* structTree-root.
*Somehow I didn't think of this yesterday, but this feels like a much better solution overall; sorry about the churn here!*
Looking at the API, there's no code which actually sends this message. Most likely it's a left-over from a previous version of PR 13069, since the `isPureXfa` parameter is being included in the "GetDoc" message.
When a PDF is "marked" we now generate a separate DOM that represents
the structure tree from the PDF. This DOM is inserted into the <canvas>
element and allows screen readers to walk the tree and have more
information about headings, images, links, etc. To link the structure
tree DOM (which is empty) to the text layer aria-owns is used. This
required modifying the text layer creation so that marked items are
now tracked.
- add an option to enable XFA rendering if any;
- for now, let the canvas layer: it could be useful to implement XFAF forms (embedded pdf in xml stream for the background and xfa form for the foreground);
- ui elements in template DOM are pretty close to their html counterpart so we generate a fake html DOM from template one:
- it makes easier to translate template properties to html ones;
- it makes faster the creation of the html element in the main thread.
There's built-in ESLint rule, see `sort-imports`, to ensure that all `import`-statements are sorted alphabetically, since that often helps with readability.
Unfortunately there's no corresponding rule to sort `export`-statements alphabetically, however there's an ESLint plugin which does this; please see https://www.npmjs.com/package/eslint-plugin-sort-exports
The only downside here is that it's not automatically fixable, but the re-ordering is a one-time "cost" and the plugin will help maintain a *consistent* ordering of `export`-statements in the future.
*Note:* To reduce the possibility of introducing any errors here, the re-ordering was done by simply selecting the relevant lines and then using the built-in sort-functionality of my editor.
* the goal is to execute actions like Open or OpenAction
* can be tested with issue6106.pdf (auto-print)
* once #12701 is merged, we can add page actions
* When no actions then set it to null instead of empty object
* Even if a field has no actions, it needs to listen to events from the sandbox in order to be updated if an action changes something in it.
- Actually register/unregister the `WorkerTask`s, used when saving each page, correctly.
To prevent issues when terminating the Worker, we purposely wait for all running `WorkerTask`s to complete first. Hence we need to actually handle `WorkerTask`s the same way in "SaveDocument" as in the rest of this file, see e.g. "GetOperatorList" and "GetTextContent".
- Access `PDFDocument` properties in a generally safe/consistent way.
While the current code works fine, given how the PDF document is being loaded, it still seems like a very good idea to be *consistent* in how we access these kind of properties (since in general you need to avoid `MissingDataException` everywhere in this file).
- Change a variable name, since there's essentially no precedent in the code-base for *local* variable names to start with an underscore.
Support for the `scope` parameter, in `MessageHandler.on`, was removed in PR 11110 however this particular case was unused/unnecessary for years prior to that change. (From a quick look through the history, I'm not even sure if it was actually needed in the first place.)
This simplifies/consolidates the ESLint configuration slightly in the `src/` folder, and prevents the addition of any new files where `var` is being used.[1]
Hence we no longer need to manually add `/* eslint no-var: error */` in files, which is easy to forget, and can instead disable the rule in the `src/core/` files where `var` is still in use.
---
[1] Obviously the `no-var` rule can, in the same way as every other rule, be disabled on a case-by-case basis where actually necessary.
- Check that the "Info"-entry, in the XRef-trailer, is actually a dictionary before accessing it. This is similar to the `PDFDocument.documentInfo` method and follows the general principal of validating data carefully before accessing it, given how often PDF-software may create corrupt PDF files.
- Slightly simplify the "XFA"-lookup, since there's no point in trying to fetch something from the empty dictionary.
* Move display/xml_parser.js in shared to use it in worker
* Save form data in XFA datasets when pdf is a mix of acroforms and xfa
Co-authored-by: Brendan Dahl <brendan.dahl@gmail.com>
Even though the code obviously works as-is, given that we have unit-tests for it, it still feels incorrect to just *assume* that the `Catalog`-instance has all of its properties immediately available. Especially when (almost) all of the other handlers, in `src/core/worker.js`, protect their data accesses with appropriate `pdfManager.ensure` calls.
Even though the code obviously works as-is, given that we have unit-tests for it, it still feels incorrect to just *assume* that the `XRef`-instance has all of its properties immediately available. Especially when (almost) all of the other handlers, in `src/core/worker.js`, protect their data accesses with appropriate `pdfManager.ensure` calls.
Add a new method to the API to get the optional content configuration. Add
a new render task param that accepts the above configuration.
For now, the optional content is not controllable by the user in
the viewer, but renders with the default configuration in the PDF.
All of the test files added exhibit different uses of optional content.
Fixes#269.
Fix test to work with optional content.
- Change the stopAtErrors test to ensure the operator list has something,
instead of asserting the exact number of operators.
Looking carefully at this code, you'll notice that the `loadDocument` function has no less than *three* Promise handling functions. This obviously makes no sense, since a Promise can only have one resolve and one reject handler.
Hence the final `onFailure`-case is unreachable, which only serves to add confusion when reading the code. Note that this code has been re-factored more than once over the years, but it seems as if this may even have been incorrect already in PR 3310 (and no-one have noticed for seven years :-).
