The reason that this code can be moved is that the `if (this.loading && page === 1)` check, in the `pagechange` event handler in viewer.js, is never satisfied since `this.loading` is not defined in that scope.
This *could* be considered a regression from PR 5295, since prior to that `this.loading` was using the `PDFViewerApplication` scope (or `PDFView` as it were).
However, I don't think that we need to fix that since we've been shipping this code in no less than *three* Firefox releases (uplifted in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1084158), without breaking the world.
An explanation of why the `pagechange` code works, despite `this.loading === undefined`, is that `set currentPageNumber` (in `PDFViewer`) returns early whenever `this.pdfDocument` isn't set. This check is, for all intents and purposes, functionally equivalent to checking `PDFViewerApplication.loading`.
Hence we can move the page switching code into `PDFViewer`, and also remove `PDFViewerApplication.loading` since it's not used any more.
(The `this.loading` property was added in PR 686, which was before the current viewer even existed.)
*Note:* The changes in this patch should also be beneficial to the viewer `components`, since requiring every implementer to provide their own `pagechange` event handler just to get `PDFViewer.currentPageNumber` to actually work seems like an unnecessary complication.
Fixes https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1170063.
The bug only mentions the <kbd>Meta</kbd> key, but given that a similar situation can occur for <kbd>Ctrl</kbd>, it seemed reasonable to also handle that case in the same patch.
The only possible caveat with the patch is that because of the use of `shadow`, things won't work perfectly if either of the prefs are changed *while* the viewer is active. In this case a reload is required in order for it to work correctly, but given that the issue this patch fixes should be quite rare anyway, that seems OK.
Recently I've landed a number patches which fixed issues with ColorSpaces. In most of these cases the cause of the failures were, either partially or entirely, related to the fact that we didn't resolve indirect objects (i.e. the code was missing `xref.fetchIfRef(...)`).
The purpose of this patch is to fix the few remaining cases where indirect objects *could* potentially cause failures.
Given that we have seen how this causes failures in practice, I thus think that it makes sense to try and avoid further issues, instead of waiting for users to file even more bugs for this part of the code-base.
This patch adds:
- Unit tests for the annotation border style class
- Regression test (self-made) for the annotation border style class
- Documentation generation using JSDoc
Currently in the tests which check that incorrect passwords are rejected, we don't ensure that the exceptions thrown are the ones we expect. This patch improves the current situation, so that we actually can be sure that the code "fails" in the correct way.
*Note:* This patch also fixes some cases of weird indentation in the file.
Currently non-embedded ArialBlack fonts are not rendered bold enough, compared to e.g. Adobe Reader.
The issue is that we set the font weight to `bolder`, but since that is actually relative to the font weight of the parent, the result is that there's no practical difference from just using `bold`.
This patch attempts to address that, by explicitly setting the font weight to the maximum value instead (see https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/font-weight).
*Note:* I expect one test "failure" in `issue5801`, which in this case is an improvement, since that PDF file uses ArialBlack.
Fixes 6068.
The most notable issue with the font in question is that the `differences` array contains lots of strange entries (of the type `uniXXXX`, instead of proper glyph names).
The Chrome extension is stable and has been around for a few years, so
the ancient note about the extension being experimental can be removed.
Also be a bit more specific about who maintains the Chrome extension,
to make it easier for external contributors to find who is responsible
for the development and maintenance of the PDF.js Chrome extension.
