Currently the `!mergeSubDicts` code-path is essentially just duplicated code, which we can easily avoid by simply moving that check. (This may lead to ever so slightly more parsing for this case, but the difference ought to be negligible in practice.)
- in real life some xfa contains xml like <xfa:data><xfa:Foo><xfa:Bar>...</xfa:data>
since there are no Foo or Bar in the xfa namespace the JS representation are empty
and that leads to errors.
- so the idea is to make all nodes under xfa:data namespace agnostic which means
that ns are removed from nodes in the parser but only xfa:data descendants.
*Please note:* The PDF document in issue 13751 is *dynamically* created (in e.g. Adobe Reader), with pages added when certain buttons are clicked, hence this patch simply fixes the breaking error and nothing more.
It looks like the current code contains a little bit too much copy-and-paste from the *similar* `index` branch above, since we cannot set the `startIndex` to a negative value. Note how it's being used to initialize the loop-variable, which is then used to lookup values in an Array and accessing the `-1`th element of an Array obviously makes no sense.
*This is yet another case where I've got no idea if the patch is correct, but it does at least fix a breaking error :-)*
Note how in the [`Binder._bindValue` method](683ce66a48/src/core/xfa/bind.js (L92-L93)), we're assuming that if a `data`-value exists then it'll also be possible to actually access it. For the `XFAAttribute`-implementation however, the second method is missing and that's what causes the breaking errors in issue 13748.
Please note that another possible way of "fixing" the error wouldn't been to simply change the exists-check to return `false`, and I could see that being a preferred solution.
However, the reason for submitting the current patch is that we get *fewer* warnings about Nodes with mis-matched types this way.
As can be seen in the code (see below), the `searchNode` helper function will return `null` in some cases and all of its call-sites should protect against that before attempting to access the returned data.
While only one of these changes were necessary to fix the breaking errors in issue 13756, in order to prevent future bugs I've added similar defensive code throughout this file.
- 07955fa1d3/src/core/xfa/som.js (L169)
- 07955fa1d3/src/core/xfa/som.js (L239)
- 07955fa1d3/src/core/xfa/som.js (L254)
For e.g. `gulp mozcentral`, the *built* `pdf.worker.js` file decreases from `1 837 608` to `1 834 907` bytes with this patch-series.
The improvement comes first of all from less overall indentation in `PDFFunction`, and secondly from the removal of (now) unnecessary indirection in the code.
*This follows the exact same princial as PR 12083, but for the `PDFFunction` parsing instead.*
Given that the IR format is completely unused now, all that the current code does is add a bunch of unnecessary indirection/overhead to the handling of PDF-functions.
With this patch, the `PDFPageProxy.getOperatorList` method will now return `PDFOperatorList`-instances that also include Annotation-operatorLists (when those exist). Hence this closes a small, but potentially confusing, gap between the `render` and `getOperatorList` methods.
Previously we've been somewhat reluctant to do this, as explained below, but given that there's actual use-cases where it's required probably means that we'll *have* to implement it now.
Since we still need the ability to separate "normal" rendering operations from direct `getOperatorList` calls in the worker-thread, this API-change unfortunately causes the *internal* renderingIntent to become a bit "messy" which is indeed unfortunate (note the `"oplist-"` strings in various spots). As-is I suppose that it's not all that bad, but we may want to consider changing the *internal* renderingIntent to e.g. a bitfield in the future.
Besides fixing issue 13704, this patch would also be necessary if someone ever tries to implement e.g. issue 10165 (since currently `PDFPageProxy.getOperatorList` doesn't include Annotation-operatorLists).
*Please note:* This patch is *also* tagged "api-minor" for a second reason, which is that we're now including the Annotation-id in the `beginAnnotation` argument. The reason for this is to allow correlating the Annotation-data returned by `PDFPageProxy.getAnnotations`, with its corresponding operatorList-data (for those Annotations that have it).
When working on PR 13612, I mostly prioritized a simple solution that didn't require touching a lot of code. However, while working on PR 13735 I started to realize that the static `Name.empty` construction really wasn't a good idea.
In particular, having a special `Name`-instance where the `name`-property isn't actually a String is confusing (to put it mildly) and can easily lead to issues elsewhere. The only reason for not simply allowing the `name`-property to be an *empty* string, in PR 13612, was to avoid having to touch a lot of existing code. However, it turns out that this is only limited to a few methods in the `PartialEvaluator` and a few of the `BaseLocalCache`-implementations, all of which can be easily re-factored to handle *empty* `Name`-instances.
All-in-all, I think that this patch is even an *overall* improvement since we're now validating (what should always be) `Name`-data better in the `PartialEvaluator`.
This is what I ought to have done from the start, sorry about the code churn here!
This way we ensure that these BBox values are *always* defined as expected for every `case`-block, and we also don't need to duplicate the lookup in multiple places. (Also, the patch removes a couple of unnecessary line-breaks in existing comments.)
Fixes https://github.com/mozilla/pdf.js/pull/13691#pullrequestreview-702356627, which was flagged by LGTM.
- font line height is taken into account by acrobat when it isn't with masterpdfeditor: I extracted a font from a pdf, modified some ascent/descent properties thanks to ttx and the reinjected the font in the pdf: only Acrobat is taken it into account. So in this patch, line heights for some substituted fonts are added.
- it seems that Acrobat is using a line height of 1.2 when the line height in the font is not enough (it's the only way I found to fix correctly bug 1718741).
- don't use flex in wrapper container (which was causing an horizontal overflow in the above bug).
- consequently, the above fixes introduced a lot of small regressions, so in order to see real improvements on reftests, I fixed the regressions in this patch:
- replace margin by padding in some case where padding is a part of a container dimensions;
- remove some flex display: some containers are wrongly sized when rendered;
- set letter-spacing to 0.01px: it helps to be sure that text is not broken because of not enough width in Firefox.
With the changes in PR 13687 we're now checking if `target` is defined *twice* in a row, which shouldn't be necessary :-)
(I noticed this when glancing at the unofficial LGTM results; maybe we should re-evalute the decision to not integrate that into the CI.)
When XFA support was added, the size of the *built* `pdf.worker.js` file increased quite a bit. Hence I think that it makes sense to, where easily possible, do what we can to (slightly) reduce the size of the PDF.js library.
The supplemental font data files (added for XFA rendering), containing rescale-factors respectively widths, seem like an excellent candidate here since they're not particularly large in either line-count or file sizes.
In this patch these files are instead merged into a *single* file per font, rather than four different ones, and even with these changes the resulting source files don't become all that large.[1]
For e.g. the `gulp mozcentral` build, this reduces the size of the *built* `pdf.worker.js` file by more than `3 kB`. Given the overall simplicity of the patch, that kind of size decrease definitely seem worthwhile to me.
---
[1] Especially when compared to truly large files such as e.g. `glyphlist.js`, `metrics.js`, and `unicode.js`.
- Fix a typo in order to open the pdf in issue #13679
- After fixing the fill default color there wer some regressions because of z-index
and when fixing z-index there were some regressions because of borders
- So fix the borders rendering.
The PDF.js API has only ever supported accessing the original file ID, however the second one that (should) exist in *modified* documents have thus far been completely inaccessible through the API.
That seems like a simple oversight, caused e.g. by the viewer not needing it, since it really shouldn't hurt to provide API-users with the ability to check if a PDF document has been modified since its creation.[1]
Please refer to https://www.adobe.com/content/dam/acom/en/devnet/pdf/pdfs/PDF32000_2008.pdf#G13.2261661 for additional information.
For an example of how to update existing code to use the new API, please see the changes in the `web/app.js` file included in this patch.
*Please note:* While I'm not sure if we'll ever be able to remove the old `PDFDocumentProxy.fingerprint` getter, given that it's existed since "forever", that probably isn't a big deal given that it's now limited to only `GENERIC`-builds.
---
[1] Although this obviously depends on the PDF software following the specification, by updating the second file ID as intended.
Using `instanceof Object` is generally problematic, since it's not guaranteed to always do the right thing for all Objects.
(I stumbled upon this while working on another patch, when I noticed that the `outlineView` was broken with workers disabled.)
- support paragraph margins, line height, letter spacing, ...
- compute missing dimensions from fields based almost on the dimensions of caption contents.
- it aims to fix#13583;
- fix the switch to breakBefore target;
- force the layout of an unsplittable element on an empty page;
- don't fail when there is horizontal overflow (except in lr-tb);
- handle correctly overflow in the same content area (bug 1717805, bug 1717668);
- fix a typo in radial gradient first argument.
- some pdf use some fonts which are not embedded or they don't have any width array or don't have any css info (e.g. for standard fonts or Arial).
- so add widths arrays for Liberation fonts in order to compute the ones for other fonts in using scale factors array.
- the break element has been deprecated in XFA 2.4 but some old documents can use it, so replace it with one (or more) of its possible substitutions:
- breakBefore;
- breakAfter;
- overflow.
- when binding (after parsing) we get a map between some template nodes and some data nodes;
- so set user data in input handlers in using data node uids in the annotation storage;
- to save the form, just put the value we have in the storage in the correct data nodes, serialize the xml as a string and then write the string at the end of the pdf using src/core/writer.js;
- fix few bugs around data bindings:
- the "Off" issue in Bug 1716980.
According to a comment in `readCmapTable`, we're assuming that the cmap tables (when more than one exist) are sorted in ascending order. If that's not the case, keep checking the following cmap tables in order to fix the referenced issue.
- when the CSS line-height property is set to 'normal' then the value depends of the user agent. So use a line height based on the font itself and if for any reasons this value is not available use 1.2 as default.
- it's a partial fix for https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1717681.
Apparently some really bad PDF software can create documents with *empty* `Name`-entries, which we thus need to somehow deal with.
While I don't know if this patch is necessarily the best solution, it should at least ensure that the *empty* `Name`-instance cannot accidentally match a proper `Name`-instance (and it doesn't require changes to a lot of existing code).[1]
---
[1] I briefly considered using a `Symbol` rather than an Object, but quickly decided against that since the former one [is not clonable](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Web_Workers_API/Structured_clone_algorithm#supported_types) and `Name`-instances may be sent to the API.
- it aims to fix https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1716838.
- some fonts in the pdf in the bug where bold when they shouldn't so write the font properties in the html to avoid to use some wrong inherited ones.
- partial fix for https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1716980;
- some pdf can contain an invalid font family (e.g. 'Windings 3') so in this case remove the space;
- the font family in typeface attribute doesn't always match the one defined in the FontDescriptor dictionary.
Given that we're not imposing any font-type restrictions[1] in the non-/FontDescriptor case, it's not really clear to me why we'd actually need to do that in the general case.
Please note that there's some *expected* movement, all of which should be improvements, in the `fips197.pdf` file with this patch.
---
[1] With the exception of Type3-fonts, of course.
*Sorry about the churn here, since the change that I made in PR 13516 was not very smart.*
With the current code, it's now *impossible* for a user to actually control the `useSystemFonts` option manually. To prevent outright breakage we obviously still need to default to setting `useSystemFonts = false` when `disableFontFace === true`, however that should be possible for an API consumer to override.
