For HighlightAnnotations with a built-in appearance stream, we still rely on it to specify the opacity correctly via a suitable blend mode. However, if the Annotation-drawing operators are placed *within* a /XObject of the /Form-type, the /ExtGState won't apply to the final rendering and the result is that the highlighting obscures the underlying text.
The more *correct* and general solution would likely be to somehow modify the implementation in `src/display/canvas.js`, to special-case handling of /Form-type /XObjects when rendering Annotations. Since we can very easily work-around this problem for now by using the "no appearance stream" code-path, doing *something* here ought to be preferable.
This patch is (obviously) merely a work-around, but given that the referenced issue is (as far as I know) the first case we've seen of this problem a simple solution will hopefully suffice for now.
This fixes the colours, by respecting the strokeAlpha/fillAlpha-values, for a couple of Annotations in the PDF document from issue 13447.[1]
---
[1] Some of the annotations still won't render at all, when compared with Adobe Reader, but that could/should probably be handled separately.
- for xfa rendering, fonts are loaded and used in html;
- when printed and saved in pdf, on linux, Firefox uses cairo backend
- when subsetting a font, cairo uses the font postscript name and when this one is empty that leads to a bug
(the append at 63f0d62684/src/cairo-cff-subset.c (L2049) is failing because of null length)
- so this patch adds a postscript name to the font to make cairo happy.
Currently `charsCache` is initialized *lazily*, which considering that it just contains a simple `Object` doesn't seem entirely necessary. This first of all forces us to do repeated exists-checks in the `Font.charsToGlyphs` method, and secondly the similar/related `glyphCache` is already initialized eagerly.
Furthermore, this patch also does a bit of clean-up in the `Font.charsToGlyphs` method since this code is quite old.
- the only goal of this patch is to be able to get synchronously the fake html when printing from firefox:
- in order to print we need to inject some html in beforeprint callback but we cannot block in waiting for all the pages.
- from a memory point of view: it doesn't change anything since the fake HTML is deleted in the worker;
- this way we don't break any assumptions.
- I thought it was possible to rely on browser layout engine to handle layout stuff but it isn't possible
- mainly because when a contentArea overflows, we must continue to layout in the next contentArea
- when no more contentArea is available then we must go to the next page...
- we must handle breakBefore and breakAfter which allows to "break" the layout to go to the next container
- Sometimes some containers don't provide their dimensions so we must compute them in order to know where to put
them in their parents but to compute those dimensions we need to layout the container itself...
- See top of file layout.js for more explanations about layout.
- fix few bugs in other places I met during my work on layout.
Given that `URL`s aren't supported by the structured clone algorithm, see https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Web_Workers_API/Structured_clone_algorithm, the document in issue 1773 will cause the browser to throw `DataCloneError: The object could not be cloned.`-errors and nothing will render.
To fix this, we'll instead simply send the stringified version of the `URL` to prevent these errors from occuring.
The building of glyph paths, in the `FontRendererFactory`, can fail in various ways for corrupt font data. However, we're currently not attempting to handle any such errors in the evaluator, which means that a single broken glyph *can* prevent an entire page from rendering.
To address this we simply have to pass along, and check, the existing `ignoreErrors` option in `PartialEvaluator.buildFontPaths` similar to the rest of the `PartialEvaluator` code.
According to the specification, see https://web.archive.org/web/20210404042322if_/https://www.adobe.com/content/dam/acom/en/devnet/acrobat/pdfs/PDF32000_2008.pdf#G6.2384179, the keys of a NameTree/NumberTree should be ordered.
For corrupt PDF files, which violate this assumption, it's thus possible that trying to lookup a single entry fails.
Previously, in PR 10274, we implemented a fallback that only applies to the "bottom" node of a NameTree/NumberTree, which in general might not actually help for sufficiently corrupt NameTree/NumberTree data.
Instead we remove the current *limited* fallback from `NameOrNumberTree.get`, and defer to the call-site to handle this case explicitly e.g. by using `NameOrNumberTree.getAll` for data where that makes sense. For well-formed documents, these changes should *not* lead to any additional data fetching/parsing.
Finally, as part of these changes, the validation of named destination data is improved in the `Catalog` and a new unit-test is also added.
To get the maximum benefit from something like Prettier, you obviously don't want to disable the automatic formatting unless absolutely necessary. When we added Prettier there were a number of cases, mostly involving larger Arrays, which required disabling of the automatic formatting for overall readability and/or to not break inline comments.
With changes in Prettier version `2.3.0`, see [the release notes](https://prettier.io/blog/2021/05/09/2.3.0.html#concise-formatting-of-number-only-arrays-10106httpsgithubcomprettierprettierpull10106-10160httpsgithubcomprettierprettierpull10160-by-thorn0httpsgithubcomthorn0), there's now better formatting support for Arrays containing only numbers. Hence we can now remove a number of `// prettier-ignore` comments, and thus get the benefit of automatic formatting in (slightly) more of the code-base.
- in charstring specs at page 21 (section 4.2): "Also, it may appear in the charstring as the difference from nominalWidthX" so the number we've on the stack doesn't have to be positive.
- currently this bug has probably no visible effect
- but when the font is loaded to be used with XFA, then the rendering is incorrect.
