Even though the code obviously works as-is, given that we have unit-tests for it, it still feels incorrect to just *assume* that the `Catalog`-instance has all of its properties immediately available. Especially when (almost) all of the other handlers, in `src/core/worker.js`, protect their data accesses with appropriate `pdfManager.ensure` calls.
Even though the code obviously works as-is, given that we have unit-tests for it, it still feels incorrect to just *assume* that the `XRef`-instance has all of its properties immediately available. Especially when (almost) all of the other handlers, in `src/core/worker.js`, protect their data accesses with appropriate `pdfManager.ensure` calls.
In `display/canvas.js` the accent offsets must be multiplied by `fontSize` to make the offsets large enough. Another problem is in `core/type1_parser.js` when the Type1 command `seac` is handled. There is an error in the Adobe Type1 spec. See chapter 6 in Type1 Font Format Supplement, which provides an errata: The arguments of `seac` specify the offset of the left side bearing (LSB) points, not the offset of origins. This can be fixed in `core/type1_parser.js` by adding the difference of the LSB values.
Currently there's enough leading padding that the `numPages` span feels somewhat "disconnected" from the `pageNumber` input, which seems unfortunate when they contain related state.
In addition to the unit tests these reference tests make sure that this
document, that triggered some edge cases in our code, can be rendered
and printed successfully now.
The down appearance (`D`) is optional and not available in the document
from #12233, so the checkboxes are never saved/printed as checked
because the checked appearance is based on the export value that is
missing because the `D` entry is not available.
Instead, we should use the normal appearance (`N`) since that one is
required and therefore always available.
Finally, the /Off appearance is optional according to section 12.7.4.2.3
of the specification, so that needs to be taken into account to match
the specification and to fix reference test failures for the
`annotation-button-widget-print` test. That is a file that doesn't
specify an /Off appearance in the normal appearance dictionary.
The helper method `_decodeFormValue` is used to ensure that it happens
in one place. Note that form values are field values, display values
and export values.
Obviously it doesn't make sense to call that method without providing an `AnnotationStorage`-instance, however we should ensure that doing so won't cause errors.
Hence we need to check that `annotationStorage` is actually defined, before attempting to call its `resetModified` method.
This solution is obviously *not* perfect, since printing being cancelled will thus remove the warning as well. However, a similar problem already exists for saving, since the user may cancel that one as well.
All-in-all, since way cannot really detect with absolute certainty that either saving or printing actually finished, this seems good enough for now.
This commit makes the following improvements:
- The code is similar to the other interactive form widgets now, with a
clear note for the only difference.
- Calling `getOrCreateValue` unconditionally ensures that choice widgets
always have a value in the annotation storage. Previously we only
inserted a value in the annotation storage when an option matched or
when a selection was changed. However, this causes breakage when
saving/printing because comboboxes, which we don't fully support yet
but are rendered, might not have a value in storage at all. Their
field value might not match any option since it allows the user to
enter a custom value.
- Calling `getOrCreateValue` unconditionally ensures that forms with
choice widgets no longer always trigger a warning when the user
navigates away from the page. This fixes
https://github.com/mozilla/pdf.js/pull/12241#discussion_r474279654
Given that `renderInteractiveForms` is now enabled by default in "full" viewer, it seems reasonable to enable it by default in the viewer components as well.
Especially considering that it's simple to disable, when creating the affected components, for anyone implementing their own viewer.
The export value is used when the document is saved, so it should also
be used when the document is opened to determine which choice widget
option is selected. The display value is, as the name implies, only to
be used for viewer display purposes and not for other logic.
This makes sure that in the document from #12233 the "Favourite colour"
choice widget is correctly initialized with "Red" instead of "Black"
because the field value is equal to the export value (always the case),
but not the display value (not always the case). Moreover, saving now
also correctly uses the export value and not the display value.
Related to https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1659753
This allows Firefox trigger a "save" event from ctrl/cmd+s or the "Save
Page As" context menu, which in turn lets pdf.js generate a new PDF if
there is form data to save.
I also now use `sourceEventType` on downloads so Firefox can determine if
it should launch the "open with" dialog or "save as" dialog.
With the changes in PR 11077, the zoom dropdown now looks "squashed" in locales with longer than average zoom-strings[1]. The reason is that the zoom-value and the dropdown-icon are too close together, which doesn't look good in affected locales.
To fix this, the following changes are made:
- Increase the calculated dropdown width, in `Toolbar._adjustScaleWidth`, to account for the much wider icon (7 px -> 16 px) and the increased padding.
- Move the dropdown-icon *slightly* outwards, and also *slightly* reduce the left (right in RTL locales) padding of the dropdown-contents.
- Finally, remove the right (left in RTL locales) padding to reduce the chance of the *default* browser dropdown-icon being visible.
---
[1] This affects e.g. the `de` and `nl` locales, but there's probably other examples as well.
The specification states that the field value is `null` if no item is
selected and we didn't handle this case properly. Even though this did
not break the rendering because we always convert the value to an array
and the `includes` check in the display layer would simply not match,
the field value would be `[null]` which is not expected and strange from
an API perspective.
This commit fixes that by ensuring that we return an empty array in
case the field value is `null`. The API therefore still always gives an
array for the field value, but now the code is more specific so that the
value is either an empty array or an array of strings.
This commit follows the same pattern as another unit test in this file
and both reduces existing and future code duplication (since the next
commit will extend this test with an additional input).
This commit includes support for rendering pages in printing mode,
which, when combined with annotation storage data, is useful for testing
if form data is correctly rendered onto the printed canvas.
This is needed for some smoke tests in mozilla central for testing forms
in pdf.js.
Note: AnnotationLayerBuilder.render() doesn't really need to be async, but
we're talking of making the annotation's render functions async, so this
will make that switch easier.
Note that this will increase the run-time of `gulp dist` and `gulp dist-install`, but that's unavoidable given that there's now additional building happening.
