Given that the GV-viewer isn't using most of the UI-related components of the default-viewer, we can avoid including them in the *built* viewer to save space.[1]
The least "invasive" way of implementing this, at least that I could come up with, is to leverage import maps with suitable stubs for the GV-viewer.
The one slightly annoying thing is that we now have larger import maps across multiple html-files, and you'll need to remember to update all of them when making future changes.
---
[1] With this patch, the built `viewer.js` size is 391 kB and `viewer-geckoview.js` is 285 kB.
After the changes in PR 14112 the `PDFViewer`-class is now "identical" to the `BaseViewer`-class and the `PDFSinglePageViewer`-class is just a very thin wrapper around the `BaseViewer`-class.
Hence we can rename these files, and also remove the abstract `BaseViewer`-class, which helps reduce some unnecessary "closures" in the *built* viewer.
*Please note:* These changes are made in two separate commits, to allow GitHub to preserve `blame` for the affected files.
By invoking the `reset` methods *last* in the `Toolbar`/`SecondaryToolbar`-constructors, we ensure that the "toolbarreset"/"secondarytoolbarreset"-events are actually handle when the viewer loads. Note that previously those events were dispatched *before* the relevant event-listeners had been attached.
With this small change we can avoid inconsistent initial toolbar-state, specifically in the case when the viewer is *reloaded* (since Firefox keeps the HTML-state on "soft" reloads).
This new CSS variable will allow us to simplify a couple of different viewer components, since we no longer need to use JavaScript-based hacks and can directly set the CSS rules instead. In particular:
- The `BaseViewer`-handling, used as part of the code that will center pages *vertically* in PresentationMode, can be simplified.
By using CSS to control the height of the "dummy"-page we avoid unnecessarily invalidating the scale-value, which can reduce *some* unneeded re-rendering while PresentationMode is active.
- The `SecondaryToolbar.#setMaxHeight`-method, and its associated parameters, are no longer necessary and can be completely removed.
Note that in order for things to work correctly in general, the new `--viewer-container-height` CSS variable must potentially be updated on any window-based "resize"-event (even when there's no zooming). While this is currently only done in the default viewer, that shouldn't be an issue since neither PresentationMode nor Toolbar-functionality is included in the "viewer components".
Note how both of the openFile-buttons are always hidden during viewer initialization in the MOZCENTRAL build, i.e. the *built-in* Firefox PDF Viewer. Despite that we still include HTML, CSS, and JavaScript code for these buttons in the build.
This patch *reduces* the size of the `gulp mozcentral` output by `1679` bytes, which isn't a lot but still cannot hurt.
*Please note:* I don't really know anything about a11y, hence it's possible that this patch either doesn't work correctly or at least isn't a complete solution.
In both the SecondaryToolbar and the Sidebar we have "button groups" that functionally acts essentially like radio-buttons. Based on skimming through [this MDN article](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Accessibility/ARIA/Roles/radio_role) it thus appears that we should tag them as such, using `role="radiogroup"` and `role="radio"`, and then utilize the `aria-checked` attribute to indicate to a11y software which button is currently active.
This patch is essentially a continuation of PR 11263, which tried to improve loading/initialization performance of *very* large/long documents.
Note that browsers, in general, don't handle a huge amount of DOM-elements very well, with really poor (e.g. sluggish scrolling) performance once the number gets "large". Furthermore, at least in Firefox, it seems that DOM-elements towards the bottom of a HTML-page can effectively be ignored; for the PDF.js viewer that means that pages at the end of the document can become impossible to access.
Hence, in order to improve things for these *very* large/long documents, this patch will now enforce usage of the (recently added) PAGE-scrolling mode for these documents. As implemented, this will only happen once the number of pages *exceed* 15000 (which is hopefully rare in practice).
While this might feel a bit jarring to users being *forced* to use PAGE-scrolling, it seems all things considered like a better idea to ensure that the entire document actually remains accessible and with (hopefully) more acceptable performance.
Fixes [bug 1588435](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1588435), to the extent that doing so is possible since the document contains 25560 pages (and is 197 MB large).
This was added on the assumption that the viewer would (eventually) start using the `PDFSinglePageViewer` for e.g. PAGE-scrolling mode and PresentationMode. However, having both a `PDFViewer` and a `PDFSinglePageViewer` side-by-side in the viewer would've been tricky to implement well, which is why PR 14112 implemented PAGE-scrolling for the general `BaseViewer` instead.
Given that the default viewer is no longer (potentially) going to use `PDFSinglePageViewer`, there's code in the `SecondaryToolbar` (and related CSS rules) which is now unnecessary.
With the previous commit, both of the `PDFViewer` and `PDFSinglePageViewer` clases are now small/simple enough that it no longer seems necessary to keep them in separate files.
This implements a new Page scrolling mode, essentially bringing (and extending) the functionality from `PDFSinglePageViewer` into the regular `PDFViewer`-class. Compared to `PDFSinglePageViewer`, which as its name suggests will only display one page at a time, in the `PDFViewer`-implementation this new Page scrolling mode also support spreadModes properly (somewhat similar to e.g. Adobe Reader).
Given the size and scope of these changes, I've tried to focus on implementing the basic functionality. Hence there's room for further clean-up and/or improvements, including e.g. simplifying the CSS/JS related to PresentationMode and implementing easier page-switching with the mouse-wheel/arrow-keys.
This patch helps reduce some duplication, given that we now have a few essentially identical `addLinkAttributes` call-sites in the code-base.
To prevent runtime errors in the Annotation/XFA-layer code, we'll warn if a custom/incomplete `PDFLinkService` is being used (limited to GENERIC builds).
aria-controls state
In testing, screen readers such as JAWS have trouble understanding the expanded state of the buttons that expand hidden menus due to lacking aria-expanded attribute. Also, given that the buttons do not contain the controlled/shown element, they should also define the aria-controls attribute with associated element id per https://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria-1.1/#aria-expanded
This fixes adds these requirements for the sidebar, find, and secondary toolbar buttons.
Please note that these changes were done automatically, using `gulp lint --fix`.
Given that the major version number was increased, there's a fair number of (primarily whitespace) changes; please see https://prettier.io/blog/2020/03/21/2.0.0.html
In order to reduce the size of these changes somewhat, this patch maintains the old "arrowParens" style for now (once mozilla-central updates Prettier we can simply choose the same formatting, assuming it will differ here).
Since the goal has always been, essentially since the `EventBus` abstraction was added, to remove all dispatching of DOM events[1] from the viewer components this patch tries to address one thing that came up when updating the examples:
The DOM events are always dispatched last, and it's thus guaranteed that all internal event listeners have been invoked first.
However, there's no such guarantees with the general `EventBus` functionality and the order in which event listeners are invoked is *not* specified. With the promotion of the `EventBus` in the examples, over DOM events, it seems like a good idea to at least *try* to keep this ordering invariant[2] intact.
Obviously this won't prevent anyone from manually calling the new *internal* viewer component methods on the `EventBus`, but hopefully that won't be too common since any existing third-party code would obviously use the `on`/`off` methods and that all of the examples shows the *correct* usage (which should be similarily documented on the "Third party viewer usage" Wiki-page).
---
[1] Looking at the various Firefox-tests, I'm not sure that it'll be possible to (easily) re-write all of them to not rely on DOM events (since getting access to `PDFViewerApplication` might be generally difficult/messy depending on scopes).
In any case, even if technically feasible, it would most likely add *a lot* of complication that may not be desireable in the various Firefox-tests. All-in-all, I'd be fine with keeping the DOM events only for the `MOZCENTRAL` target and gated on `Cu.isInAutomation` (or similar) rather than a preference.
[2] I wouldn't expect any *real* bugs in a custom implementation, simply based on event ordering, but it nonetheless seem like a good idea if any "external" events are still handled last.
This should hopefully be useful in environments where restrictive CSPs are in effect.
In most cases the replacement is entirely straighforward, and there's only a couple of special cases:
- For the `src/display/font_loader.js` and `web/pdf_outline_viewer.js `cases, since the elements aren't appended to the document yet, it shouldn't matter if the style properties are set one-by-one rather than all at once.
- For the `web/debugger.js` case, there's really no need to set the `padding` inline at all and the definition was simply moved to `web/viewer.css` instead.
*Please note:* There's still *a single* case left, in `web/toolbar.js` for setting the width of the zoom dropdown, which is left intact for now.
The reasons are that this particular case shouldn't matter for users of the general PDF.js library, and that it'd make a lot more sense to just try and re-factor that very old code anyway (thus fixing the `setAttribute` usage in the process).
In order to eventually get rid of SystemJS and start using native `import`s instead, we'll need to provide "complete" file identifiers since otherwise there'll be MIME type errors when attempting to use `import`.
Please find additional details about the ESLint rule at https://eslint.org/docs/rules/prefer-const
Note that this patch is generated automatically, by using the ESLint `--fix` argument, and will thus require some additional clean-up (which is done separately).
Note that Prettier, purposely, has only limited [configuration options](https://prettier.io/docs/en/options.html). The configuration file is based on [the one in `mozilla central`](https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/source/.prettierrc) with just a few additions (to avoid future breakage if the defaults ever changes).
Prettier is being used for a couple of reasons:
- To be consistent with `mozilla-central`, where Prettier is already in use across the tree.
- To ensure a *consistent* coding style everywhere, which is automatically enforced during linting (since Prettier is used as an ESLint plugin). This thus ends "all" formatting disussions once and for all, removing the need for review comments on most stylistic matters.
Many ESLint options are now redundant, and I've tried my best to remove all the now unnecessary options (but I may have missed some).
Note also that since Prettier considers the `printWidth` option as a guide, rather than a hard rule, this patch resorts to a small hack in the ESLint config to ensure that *comments* won't become too long.
*Please note:* This patch is generated automatically, by appending the `--fix` argument to the ESLint call used in the `gulp lint` task. It will thus require some additional clean-up, which will be done in a *separate* commit.
(On a more personal note, I'll readily admit that some of the changes Prettier makes are *extremely* ugly. However, in the name of consistency we'll probably have to live with that.)
Sometimes we also used `@return` or `@returns`, but `@type` is what
the JSDoc documentation recommends. This also improves the documentation
because before this commit the types were not shown and now they are.
There's a bunch of code, in the viewer, which for historical reasons use `switch` statements to add and remove CSS classes.
This code can be simplified, and unnecessary duplication avoided, by using `classList.toggle` instead.
The intention with preferences such as `sidebarViewOnLoad`/`scrollModeOnLoad`/`spreadModeOnLoad` were always that they should be able to *unconditionally* override their view history counterparts.
Due to the way that these preferences were initially implemented[1], trying to e.g. force the sidebar to remain hidden on load cannot be guaranteed[2]. The reason for this is the use of "enumeration values" containing zero, which in hindsight was an unfortunate choice on my part.
At this point it's also not as simple as just re-numbering the affected structures, since that would wreak havoc on existing (modified) preferences. The only reasonable solution that I was able to come up with was to change the *default* values of the preferences themselves, but not their actual values or the meaning thereof.
As part of the refactoring, the `disablePageMode` preference was combined with the *adjusted* `sidebarViewOnLoad` one, to hopefully reduce confusion by not tracking related state separately.
Additionally, the `showPreviousViewOnLoad` and `disableOpenActionDestination` preferences were combined into a *new* `viewOnLoad` enumeration preference, to further avoid tracking related state separately.
Given that the non-default Spread modes (currently) doesn't affect the page layout when horizontal scrolling is enabled, having the Spread buttons appear active when clicking them appears to do *nothing* is probably confusing rather than helpful to users.
If the current viewer is a `PDFSinglePageViewer` instance the Scroll/Spread modes are no-ops, hence displaying buttons that do *nothing* when clicked will probably do very little besides confuse users.
The names 'resetscrollmode'/'resetspreadmode' were probably *not* great choices, given that the only thing being reset are toolbar buttons and not the actual Scroll/Spread modes. Furthermore, there's really no need for two separate events here.
The patch also adds a comment that ought to have been included in PR 9040, to prevent future refactoring/removing of what may appear to be an unnecessary `Promise.resolve` call.
Since the Scroll/Spread modes are now document specific, as all other properties such as page/scale/rotation, ensure that the toolbar is always correctly reset.
The Secondary Toolbar buttons for, not to mention the actual toggling of, Scroll/Spread modes are currently completely broken in older browsers (such as IE11).
As a follow-up, it'd probably be a good idea to try and find a *feature complete* `classList` polyfill that could be used instead, but this patch at least addresses the immediate regression.
Please refer to the compatibility information in https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Element/classList#Browser_compatibility
This builds on the scrolling mode work to add three buttons for joining
page spreads together: one for the default view, with no page spreads,
and two for spreads starting on odd-numbered or even-numbered pages.
With the current way that the `HandTool` is implemented, if someone would try to also add a Zoom tool (as issue 1260 asks for) that probably wouldn't work very well given that you'd then have two cursor tools which may not play nice together.
Hence this patch, which attempts to refactor things so that it should be simpler to add e.g. a Zoom tool as well (given that that issue is marked as "good-beginner-bug", and I'm not sure if that really applies considering the current state of the code).
Note that I personally have no interest in implementing a Zoom tool (similar to Adobe Reader) since I wouldn't use it, but I figured that it can't hurt to make this code a bit more future proof.
Note that as discussed on IRC, this makes the viewer slightly slower to load *only* in `gulp server` mode, however the difference seem slight enough that I think it will be fine.
There's really no good reason to attempt to adjust the `max-height` of the `SecondaryToolbar` when it's not visible, so let's not do that anymore.
Also, we can listen for the `resize` event in `SecondaryToolbar`, to avoid having to manually call the `max-height` adjust function from various event handlers in `app.js`. Please note that by always adjusting the `max-height` when the toolbar is opened we no longer need the `localized` event, since it was mainly used to set a correct inital `max-height` value.
