In the referenced PDF document there are "numbers" which consist only of `-.`, and while that's obviously not valid Adobe Reader seems to handle it just fine.
Letting this method ignore more invalid "numbers" was suggested during the review of PR 14543, so let's simply relax our the validation here.
It appears that PR 15593 broke `issue12402`, and we thus need to partially restore the /Count check.
I completely missed this when looking at the test-results for PR 15593, both locally and on the bots, since the `Driver._getLastPageNumber` method would "swallow" an unavailable page number.
After PR 14311, and follow-up patches, we no longer require that the /Count entry (in the /Pages dictionary) is either present or even valid in order to parse/render a PDF document.
Hence it seems strange to keep this requirement for *corrupt* PDF documents, when trying to find a usable `trailer` in the `XRef.indexObjects` method.
With the changes in the previous patch we can move the glyph-cache lookup to the top of the method and thus avoid a bunch of, in *almost* every case, completely unnecessary re-parsing for every `charCode`.
This method, and its class, was originally added in PR 4453 to reduce memory usage when parsing text. Then PR 13494 extended the `Glyph`-representation slightly to also include the `charCode`, which made the `matchesForCache` method *effectively* redundant since most properties on a `Glyph`-instance indirectly depends on that one. The only exception is potentially `isSpace` in multi-byte strings.
Also, something that I noticed when testing this code: The `matchesForCache` method never worked correctly for `Glyph`s containing `accent`-data, since Objects are passed by reference in JavaScript. For affected fonts, of which there's only a handful of examples in our test-suite, we'd fail to find an already existing `Glyph` because of this.
When we fail to find a usable PDF document `trailer` *and* there were errors during parsing, try and fallback to a *previous* generation as a last resort during fetching of uncompressed references.
*Please note:* This will not affect "normal" PDF documents, with valid /XRef data, and even most *corrupt* documents should be completely unaffected by these changes.
Part of this is very old code, and back when support for parsing the catalog-version was added things became less clear (in my opinion).
Hence this patch tries to improve things, by e.g. validating the header- and catalog-version separately.
Given the sheer number of heuristics added to this method over the years, moving the *valid* unicode found case to the top should improve readability of the code.
This code was added all the way back in PR 6698, almost seven years ago, for backwards compatibility reasons. At this point in time, it seems that we can remove that since:
- We have more fine-grained "UnsupportedFeature" reporting elsewhere in the worker-thread code nowadays.
- The GetOperatorList-handling is now using `ReadableStream`s, which means that errors are being forwarded to the main-thread anyway.
- We're also no longer displaying a notification-bar, in the *built-in* Firefox PDF Viewer, for any of these "UnsupportedFeature" messages.
*Please note:* I don't really know what I'm doing here, however the patch appears to fix the referenced issue when comparing the rendering with Adobe Reader (with the caveat that I don't speak the language in question).
Note how after having found the "%PDF-" prefix we then read both the prefix and the version in the loop, only to then remove the prefix at the end.
It seems better to instead advance the stream position past the "%PDF-" prefix, and then read only the version data.
Finally the loop-condition can also be simplified slightly, to further clean-up some very old code.
*Fixes a regression from PR 15246, sorry about that!*
The return value of all `Annotation.getOperatorList` methods was changed in PR 15246, however I missed updating the error code-path in `Page.getOperatorList` which thus breaks all operatorList-parsing for pages with corrupt Annotations.
Looking at the code on the worker-thread, there doesn't appear to be any particular reason for placing *some* of the properties in a `source`-object when sending them with "GetDocRequest".
As is often the case the explanation for this structure is rather "for historical reasons", since originally we simply sent the `source`-object as-is. Doing that was obviously a bad idea, for a couple of reasons:
- It makes it less clear what is/isn't actually needed on the worker-thread.
- Sending unused properties will unnecessarily increase memory usage.
- The `source`-object may contain unclonable data, which would break the library.
Rather than sending all of these parameters individually and then grouping them together on the worker-thread, we can simply handle that in the API instead.
I noticed the 256 % 3 (which is equal to 1) so I slighty simplify the code.
The sum of the 16 Uint8 doesn't exceed 2^12, hence we can just take the
sum modulo 3.
This patch first of all makes `isOffscreenCanvasSupported` configurable, defaulting to `true` in browsers and `false` in Node.js environments, with a new `getDocument` parameter. While you normally want to use this, in order to improve performance, it should still be possible for users to control it (similar to e.g. `isEvalSupported`).
The specific problem, as reported in issue 14952, is that the SVG back-end doesn't support the new ImageMask data-format that's introduced in PR 14754. In particular:
- When the SVG back-end is used in Node.js environments, this patch will "just work" without the user needing to make any code changes.
- If the SVG back-end is used in browsers, this patch will require that `isOffscreenCanvasSupported: false` is added to the `getDocument`-call.
*Please note:* The referenced issue is the only mention that I can find, in either GitHub or Bugzilla, of "GoToE" actions.
Hence why I've purposely settled for a very simple, and partial, "GoToE" implementation to avoid complicating things initially.[1] In particular, this patch only supports "GoToE" actions that references the /EmbeddedFiles-dict in the PDF document.
See https://web.archive.org/web/20220309040754if_/https://www.adobe.com/content/dam/acom/en/devnet/pdf/pdfs/PDF32000_2008.pdf#G11.2048909
---
[1] Usually I always prefer having *real-world* test-cases to work with, whenever I'm implementing new features.
Note that this PR only adds the "underscore"-variant of *actually existing* ligatures, however the referenced PDF document also uses a couple of non-standard ones (e.g. `ft`, `Th`, and `fh`) that we cannot easily support without larger changes (since they don't have official Unicode-entries).
Given that it's clearly the PDF document, and its fonts, that's the culprit here it's not entirely clear to me that we actually want to attempt a larger refactoring/rewriting of the `glyphlist.js` code, assuming it's even generally possible. Especially when this patch alone already improves our copy-paste behaviour when compared to both Adobe Reader and PDFium, and that this is only the *second* time this sort of bug has been reported.
OperatorList.addOp can trigger a flush if it's required, hence the values passed to it must
be correctly initialized in order to avoid some wrong values in the renderer.
Because of that a clip path was considered as empty, nothing was clipped, hence the wrong
rendering in bug 1791583.
Since there are no script engine with XFA, the FormCalc parser is not used irl.
The bug @nmtigor noticed was hidden by another one (the wrong check on `match`).
Most of the `String.prototype.search` call-sites found throughout the code-base is actually not necessary, since we usually only want a *boolean*, and those can be replaced with `RegExp.prototype.test` instead.
*Please note:* This is only a, hopefully generally helpful, work-around rather than a proper solution to issue 15292.
There's something that's "special" about the Type1 fonts in the referenced PDF document, since we don't manage to find any actual font programs and thus cannot render anything.
Given that it shouldn't make sense for a Type1 font program to ever be empty, since that means that there's no glyph-data to render, we simply fallback to a standard font to at least try and render *something* in these rare cases.
Given that the change in PR 13393 was slightly speculative, given the lack of test-cases, let's just revert part of that to fix the referenced issue.
Based on a quick look at old issues and existing test-cases, it seems that most (if not all) PDF documents that benefit from using the font-data in this way lack any /ToUnicode maps which should mean that they're unaffected by these changes.
Note that this patch implements the `SetOCGState`-handling in `PDFLinkService`, rather than as a new method in `OptionalContentConfig`[1], since this action is nothing but a series of `setVisibility`-calls and that it seems quite uncommon in real-world PDF documents.
The new functionality also required some tweaks in the `PDFLayerViewer`, to ensure that the `layersView` in the sidebar is updated correctly when the optional-content visibility changes from "outside" of `PDFLayerViewer`.
---
[1] We can obviously move this code into `OptionalContentConfig` instead, if deemed necessary, but for an initial implementation I figured that doing it this way might be acceptable.
Apparently this is implemented in e.g. Adobe Reader, and the specification does support it, however it cannot be commonly used in real-world PDF documents since it took over ten years for this feature to be requested.
Given that the code is written with JavaScript module-syntax, none of this functionality will "leak" outside of this file with these change.
By removing this closure the file-size is decreased, even for the *built* `pdf.worker.js` file, since there's now less overall indentation in the code.
Given that the code is written with JavaScript module-syntax, none of this functionality will "leak" outside of this file with these changes.
For e.g. the `gulp mozcentral` command the *built* `pdf.worker.js` file-size decreases `~2 kB` with this patch, and most of the improvement comes from having less overall indentation in the code.
Given that the code is written with JavaScript module-syntax, none of this functionality will "leak" outside of this file with these changes.
By removing this closure the file-size is decreased, even for the *built* `pdf.worker.js` file, since there's now less overall indentation in the code.
By doing this in the worker-thread this code will only need to run *once*, whereas currently re-rendering of a page forces this to be repeated (e.g. after it's been scrolled out-of-view and then back into view again).
