The `fontScale` property was added in PR 1531, see commit b312719d7e in particular, apparently for the sole purpose of supporting the "acroforms" example.
However, the `fontScale` property was never used anywhere else in the code-base, and after the modernization of the "acroforms" example in PR 8030 it's been completely unused.
Finally, note that there's also a (more suitably named) `scale` property on `PageViewport` instances, which contains the exact same information as the property being removed here.
I made some mistakes when trying to make the content_disposition.js
compatible with non-modern browsers (IE/Edge).
Notably, text decoding was usually skipped because of the inverted
logical check at the top of `textdecode`.
I verified that this new version works as expected, as follows:
1. Visit 55c71eb44e/test/
and get test-content-disposition.js
also get test-content-disposition.node.js if using Node.js,
or get test-content-disposition.html if you use a browser.
2. Modify `test-content-disposition.node.js` (or the HTML file) and
change `../extension/content-disposition.js` to `PDFJS-content_disposition.js`
3. Copy the `getFilenameFromContentDispositionHeader` function from
`content_disposition.js` (i.e. the file without the trailing exports)
and save it as `PDFJS-content_disposition.js`.
4. Run the tests (`node test-content-disposition.node.js` or by opening
`test-content-disposition.html` in a browser).
5. Confirm that there are no failures: "Finished all tests (0 failures)"
The code has a best-efforts fallback for Microsoft Edge, which lacks the
TextDecoder API. The fallback only supports the common UTF-8 encoding.
To simulate this in a test, modify `PDFJS-content_disposition.js` and
deliberately throw an error before `new TextDecoder`. There will be two
failures because we don't want to include too much code to support text
decoding for non-UTF-8 encodings in Edge
```
test-content-disposition.js:265 Assertion failed: Input: attachment; filename*=ISO-8859-1''%c3%a4
Expected: "ä"
Actual : "ä"
test-content-disposition.js:268 Assertion failed: Input: attachment; filename*=ISO-8859-1''%e2%82%ac
Expected: "€"
Actual : "€"
```
Please note that while the current code works, both in the viewer and the unit-tests, it can leave the `WorkerTransport._passwordCapability` Promise in a pending state.
In the `PasswordRequest` handler, in src/display/api.js, we're returning the Promise from a `capability` object (rather than just a "plain" Promise). While an error thrown anywhere within this handler was fortunately enough to propagate it to the Worker side, it won't cause the Promise (in `WorkerTransport._passwordCapability`) to actually be rejected.
Finally note that while we're now catching errors in the `PasswordRequest` handler, those errors are still propagated to the Worker side via the (now) rejected Promise and the existing `return this._passwordCapability.promise;` line.
This prevents warnings about uncaught Promises, with messages such as "Error: Worker was destroyed during onPassword callback", when running the unit-tests both in browsers *and* in Node.js/Travis.
This should provide a better out-of-the-box experience when using PDF.js in a Node.js environment, since it's missing native support for both `@font-face` and `Image`.
Please note that this change *only* affects the default values, hence it's still possible for an API consumer to override those values when calling `getDocument`.
Also, prevents "ReferenceError: document is not defined" errors, when running the unit-tests in Node.js/Travis.
This avoids the initialization of, potentially thousands of, unnecessary `Stream` objects, by getting the required number of bytes directly instead.
Given the special behaviour, when `length === 0`, of the `getBytes`/`skip` methods, it's also necessary to handle that particular case to prevent errors when encountering empty CharStrings.
*This is a final piece of clean-up of code that I recently wrote, after which I'm done :-)*
When the `getMainThreadWorkerMessageHandler` function was added, in PR 9385, it did so by basically introducing a `web/app.js` dependency in `src/display/api.js` through the `window.pdfjsNonProductionPdfWorker` property[1]. Even though this is limited to non-`PRODUCTION` mode, i.e. `gulp server`, it still seems unfortunate to have that sort of viewer dependency in the API code itself.
With the new, much nicer and shorter, names introduced in PR 9565 we can remove this non-`PRODUCTION` hack and just use `window.pdfjsWorker` in both the viewer and the API regardless of the build mode.
---
[1] It didn't seem correct to piggy-back on the `window.pdfjsDistBuildPdfWorker` property in non-`PRODUCTION` mode.
The current PageLabel dictionary validation code won't catch some (unlikely) forms of corruption. For example: a `Type`/`S` entry being `null`/`0`/empty string, a `P`/`St` entry being `null`/`0`.
Please note: I'm not aware of any bugs caused by the old code, but I've had this patch sitting locally for some time and figured it couldn't hurt to submit it.
The `getPageSizeInches` method was implemented on `PDFDocumentProxy`, which seems conceptually wrong since the size property isn't global to the document but rather specific to each page. Hence the method is moved into `PDFPageProxy`, as `get pageSizeInches` instead to address this.
Despite the fact that new API functionality was implemented, no unit-tests were added. To prevent issues later on, we should *always* ensure that new functionality has at least some test-coverage; something that this patch also takes care of.
The new `PDFDocumentProperties._parsePageSize` method seemed unnecessary convoluted. Furthermore, in the "no data provided"-case it even returned incorrect data (an array, rather than the expected object).
Finally, the fallback strings didn't actually agree with the `en-US` locale. This inconsistency doesn't look too great, and it's thus addressed here as well.
Chrome 60 and earlier does not include credentials (cookies) in requests
made with fetch, regardless of extension permissions. This was fixed in
61.0.3138.0 by
2e231cf052
This patch disables the fetch backend in all affected Chrome versions.
The browser detection is done by checking for a change that coincides
with the release of Chrome 61.
Test case:
1. Copy the `isChromeWithFetchCredentials` function from the patch.
2. Run it in the JS console of Chrome and verify the return value.
Verified results:
- 49.0.2623.75 - false (earliest supported version by us)
- 60.0.3112.90 - false (last major version affected by bug)
- 61.0.3163.100 - true (first major version without bug)
- 65.0.3325.146 - true (current stable)
Test case 2:
1. Build the extension (`gulp chromium`) and load it in Chrome.
2. Open the developer tools, and open any PDF file.
3. In the "Network tab" of the developer tools, look at "request type".
In Chrome 60-: Should be "xhr"
In Chrome 61+: Should be "fetch"
This function combines the logic of two separate methods into one.
The loop limit is also a good thing to have for the calls in
`src/core/annotation.js`.
Moreover, since this is important functionality, a set of unit tests and
documentation is added.
It's only used in two places in the class and those callsites can
directly get the information from the dictionary, which is more readable
and avoids an additional method call.
With options being moved from the global `PDFJS` object and into `getDocument`, a side-effect is that we're now passing in a fair number of useless parameters to the various transport/network streams.
Even though this doesn't *currently* cause any problems, it nonetheless seem like a good idea to explicitly provide the parameters that are actually necessary.
One additional complication with removing this option from the global `PDFJS` object, is that the viewer currently needs to check `disableAutoFetch` in a couple of places. To address this I'm thus proposing adding a getter in `PDFDocumentProxy`, to allow checking the *actually* used values for a particular `getDocument` invocation.
Unfortunately, as far as I can tell, we still need the ability to adjust certain API options depending on the browser environment in PDF.js version `2.0`. However, we should be able to separate this from the general compatibility code in the `src/shared/compatibility.js` file.
I don't understand why the previous way importing the polyfills didn't work, and I don't have time to try and figure it out, however this patch seems to fix things.
Fixes 9514.
Fixes 9516.
Compared to most other options currently/previously residing on the global `PDFJS` object, some of the Worker specific ones (e.g. `workerPort`/`workerSrc`) probably cannot be moved into options provided directly when initializing e.g. `PDFWorker`.
The reason is that in some cases, e.g. the Webpack examples, we try to provide Worker auto-configuration and I cannot see a good solution for that use-case if we completely remove the globally available Worker configuration.
However inline with previous patches for PDF.js version `2.0`, it does seem like a worthwhile goal to move away from storing options directly on the global `PDFJS` object, since that is a pattern we should avoid going forward. Especially since one of the (eventual) goals is to attempt to *completely* remove the global `PDFJS` object, and rely solely on exporting/importing the needed functionality.
By introducing the `GlobalWorkerOptions` we thus have larger flexibility in the future, if/when the global `PDFJS` object will be removed.
With PDF.js version `2.0` we'll only support browsers with built-in `TypedArray` functionality, hence there doesn't seem to be any good reason not to implement this now.
Fixes 4888.
In order to simplify things, the undocumented `enableStats` option was removed and `pdfBug` is now instead used to enabled general debugging *and* page request/rendering stats.
Considering that in the default viewer the `stats` was only used when debugging was also enabled, this simplification (code wise) definitely seem worthwhile to me.
This removes the `PDFJS.externalLinkTarget`/`PDFJS.externalLinkRel` dependency from the viewer components, but please note that as a *temporary* solution the default viewer still uses it.
This removes the `PDFJS.imageResourcesPath` dependency from the viewer components and the test-suite, but please note that as a *temporary* solution the default viewer still uses it.
Unfortunately, as far as I can tell, we still need the ability to adjust certain viewer options depending on the browser environment in PDF.js version `2.0`. However, we should be able to separate this from the general compatibility code in the `src/shared/compatibility.js` file.
The reason for the bug is that we're only computing a checksum of the image data itself, but completely ignore the inline dictionary. The latter is important, since in practice it's not uncommon for inline images to be identical but use e.g. different ColourSpaces.
There's obviously a couple of different ways that we could compute a hash/checksum of the dictionary.
Initially I tried using `MurmurHash3_64` to compute a hash of the keys/values in the dictionary. Unfortunately this approach turned out to be *way* too slow in practice, especially for PDF files with a huge number of inline images; in particular issue 2618 would regresses quite badly with this solution.
The solution that is instead implemented in this patch, is to compute a checksum of the dictionary contents. While this is a much simpler, not to mention a lot more efficient, solution there's one drawback associated with it:
If the contents of inline image dictionaries are ordered differently, they will not be considered equal with this approach which could thus lead to failures to cache repeated inline images. In practice this doesn't seem to be a problem in any of the PDF files I've tested, and generally I'd rather err on the side of *not* caching given that too aggressive caching can easily lead to rendering bugs.
One small, but somewhat annoying, complication is that by the time `Parser.makeInlineImage` is called, we no longer know the *exact* stream position where the inline image dictionary starts. Having access to that information is crucial here, and the easiest solution I could come up with is to track this in the current `Lexer` instance.[1]
With the patch, we're thus able to fix the referenced issues without incurring large regressions in problematic cases such as issue 2618.
Fixes 9398; also improves/fixes the `issue8823` reference test.
---
[1] Obviously I'd have preferred if this patch could be limited to `Parser.makeInlineImage`, without the need for this "hack", but I'm not sure what that'd look like here.
This rule is available from https://www.npmjs.com/package/eslint-plugin-mozilla, and is enforced in mozilla-central. Note that we have the necessary `Array`/`String` polyfills and that most cases have already been fixed, see PRs 9032 and 9434.
This rule is available from https://www.npmjs.com/package/eslint-plugin-mozilla, and is enforced in mozilla-central. Note that we have a polyfill for `ChildNode.remove()` and that most cases have already been fixed, see PRs 8056 and 8138.
Fallback to the built-in JPEG decoder when browser decoding fails, and attempt to handle JPEG images with DNL (Define Number of Lines) markers (issue 8614)
First of all, note how in both `fetch_stream.js` and `node_stream.js` we always overwrite the `this._contentLength` property even when the response headers doesn't actually contain any (valid) length information. This could thus result in the `length` parameter, as passed to the network stream, being completely ignored despite having no better information available.
Secondly, in `node_stream.js` the `this._isRangeSupported` property wasn't always updated correctly based on the response headers.
Please refer to the specification, found at https://www.w3.org/Graphics/JPEG/itu-t81.pdf#page=49
Given how the JPEG decoder is currently implemented, we need to know the value of the scanLines parameter (among others) *before* parsing of the SOS (Start of Scan) data begins.
Hence the best solution I could come up with here, is to re-parse the image in the *hopefully* rare case of JPEG images that include a DNL (Define Number of Lines) marker.
Fixes 8614.
This works by making `PartialEvaluator.buildPaintImageXObject` wait for the success/failure of `loadJpegStream` on the API side *before* parsing continues.
Please note that in practice, it should be quite rare for the browser to fail loading/decoding of a JPEG image. In the general case, it should thus not be completely surprising if even `src/core/jpg.js` will fail to decode the image.
Since `loadJpegStream` is only used at a *single* spot in the code-base, and given that it's very heavily tailored to the calling code (since it relies on the data structure of `PDFObjects`), this patch simply inlines the code in `src/display/api.js` instead.
This method currently requires a fair number of parameters, which creates quite unwieldy call-sites. When invoking `buildPaintImageXObject`, you have to remember not only which arguments to supply, but also the correct order, to prevent run-time errors.
This commit is the first step for extracting a base class for the
`AES128Cipher` and the `AES256Cipher` classes. The objective here is to
make code changes (not altering the logic) to make the implementations
as similar as possible as found by creating a diff of both classes.
In particular, we extract the key size and cycles of repetitions
constants since they are different for AES-128 and AES-256. Moreover, we
rename functions to be similar.
In the `AES256Cipher` class, there was an additional assignment to
`this` in the decryption function. However, this was unnecessary because
the assignment would also be done when the loop was exited.
In the JPEG images in the referenced PDF file, the DHT (Define Huffman Tables) segments contain more data than expected based on the length parameter.
Fixes 9425.
Despite this patch removing the `disableWorker` option itself, please note that we'll still fallback to loading the worker file(s) on the main-thread when running in environments without proper Web Worker support.
Furthermore it's still possible, even with this patch, to force the use of fake workers by manually loading the necessary file using a `<script>` tag on the main-thread.[1]
That way, the functionality of the now removed `SINGLE_FILE` build target and the resulting `build/pdf.combined.js` file can still be achieved simply by adding e.g. `<script src="build/pdf.worker.js"></script>` to the HTML (obviously with the path adjusted as needed).
Finally note that the `disableWorker` option is a performance footgun, and unfortunately many existing third-party examples actually use it without providing any sort of warning/justification.
---
[1] This approach is used in the default viewer, since certain kind of debugging may be easier if the code is running directly on the main-thread.
This method returns the currently used `workerSrc`, which thus allows obtaining the fallback `workerSrc` value (e.g. when the option wasn't set by the user).
Please note that this build target, and the resulting `build/pdf.combined.js` file, is equivalent to setting the `PDFJS.disableWorker` option to `true` which is a performance footgun.
Add comments with supported browser versions where missing.
Method:
- Use MDN compat tables if available.
- Otherwise test in Chrome (31+) otherwise.
(the Chrome Web Store does not update older versions of
Chrome, so probably nobody is interested in even older
versions, even though there is an existing comment for
Chrome<29 at `document.currentScript`).
It turns out that PR 9245 unfortunately broke benchmarking completely, sorry about that!
The bug is that we were attempting to reset the current instance of `StatTimer`, instead of creating a new one as was previously done. By resetting the current instance, the `StatTimer` data fetched in `test/driver.js` is now wiped out since it points to the *same* underlying object.
This re-use of a `StatTimer` instance was asked for during review, and unfortunately I didn't test this thoroughly enough before submitting the final version of the PR.[1]
---
[1] Note that while I did test the benchmarking scripts with that PR *before* initially submitting it, I did however forget to do that after addressing the review comments which might explain why this problem went unnoticed.
This patch updates the `IPDFStreamReader` interface and ensures that the interface/implementation of `network.js`, `fetch_stream.js`, `node_stream.js`, and `transport_stream.js` all match properly.
The unit-tests are also adjusted, to more closely replicate the actual behaviour of the various actual `IPDFStreamReader` implementations.
Finally, this patch adjusts the use of the Content-Disposition filename when setting the title in the viewer, and adds `PDFDocumentProperties` support as well.
The `fetch` API is only supported for http(s), even in Chrome extensions.
Because of this limitation, we should use the XMLHttpRequest API when the
requested URL is not a http(s) URL.
Fixes#9361
These were removed in PR 9170, since they were unused in the browsers that we'll support in PDF.js version `2.0`.
However looking at the output of Travis, where a subset of the unit-tests are run using Node.js, there's warnings about `btoa` being undefined. This doesn't appear to cause any errors, which probably explains why we didn't notice this before (despite PR 9201).
Please refer to the PDF specification, in particular http://www.adobe.com/content/dam/acom/en/devnet/acrobat/pdfs/PDF32000_2008.pdf#G7.3801570
> A colour space shall be specified in one of two ways:
> - Within a content stream, the CS or cs operator establishes the current colour space parameter in the graphics state. The operand shall always be name object, which either identifies one of the colour spaces that need no additional parameters (DeviceGray, DeviceRGB, DeviceCMYK, or some cases of Pattern) or shall be used as a key in the ColorSpace subdictionary of the current resource dictionary (see 7.8.3, "Resource Dictionaries"). In the latter case, the value of the dictionary entry in turn shall be a colour space array or name. A colour space array shall never be inline within a content stream.
>
> - Outside a content stream, certain objects, such as image XObjects, shall specify a colour space as an explicit parameter, often associated with the key ColorSpace. In this case, the colour space array or name shall always be defined directly as a PDF object, not by an entry in the ColorSpace resource subdictionary. This convention also applies when colour spaces are defined in terms of other colour spaces.
This is something that I noticed while attempting to debug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1374945.
Just looking at the code, the `YRsiz` parameter seemed immediately wrong and the fact that every component used the *same* data also looked strange.
Comparing with the specification, see https://www.itu.int/rec/dologin_pub.asp?lang=e&id=T-REC-T.800-200208-S!!PDF-E&type=items#page=37, confirmed that this is indeed incorrect.
Note that I haven't got any example of a PDF file that is fixed by this patch, but that might be more luck than anything else. Manually checking a couple of files with included JPEG 2000 images, the `Csiz`/`XRsiz`/`YRsiz` parameters were `1` which could explain why this hasn't been an issue before.
Obviously we shouldn't generally make changes to `core` code without adding tests, but in this case I'm simply not sure how to obtain/create one. However, since the existing code doesn't make sense this patch could hopefully be deemed acceptable anyway.
Since multiple empty lines is virtually unused in the code-base, and the few cases that do exist look like "typos", let's enforce greater consistency here; please see https://eslint.org/docs/rules/no-multiple-empty-lines.
It is only used in a few places to handle prefixing style properties if
necessary. However, we used it only for `transform`, `transformOrigin`
and `borderRadius`, which according to Can I Use are supported natively
(unprefixed) in the browsers that PDF.js 2.0 supports. Therefore, we can
remove this class, which should help performance too since this avoids
extra function calls in parts of the code that are called often.
I've been looking into the remaining point in 8637 about blurry images, to see if we could perhaps improve the rendering quality slightly there. After quite a bit of debugging, it seems that the issue is limited to certain progressive JPEG images.
As mentioned previously, I've got no detailed knowledge of the JPEG format, but this patch does seem to improve things quite a bit for the images in question.
Squinting at https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/6c33dde6ca02b389c52e8db3d22494df8b916f33/media/libjpeg/jdphuff.c#492-639, it seems reasonable that we should take the sign of the data into account. Furthermore, looking at the specification in https://www.w3.org/Graphics/JPEG/itu-t81.pdf#page=118, the "F.2.4.3 Decoding the binary decision sequence for non-zero DC differences and AC coefficients" section even contains a description of this (even though I cannot claim to really understand the details).
The bug that this patch fixes is limited to the built-in JPEG decoder, and was unearthed by PR 9260. The underlying issue has existed since PR 6984, where the contents of this patch ought to have been included (if it weren't for the fact that we had no *easy* way to test `src/core/jpg.js` back then).
*Please note:* The slight movement in the reference test is a result of using the `src/core/jpg.js` decoder, rather than the native browser one.
This was an oversight in PR 9095, which unfortunately breaks rendering in some PDF files (e.g. the one from issue 6737).
It thus appears that we don't have any test-coverage for this code-path, and given the relative complexity of the PDF files affected by this bug I wasn't able to easily create a reduced test-case.
*Please note:* The linked test-case included in this patch is currently *not* rendered correctly (that'd be the PR 6606), but it at least gives us some test-coverage here.
Initially I just implemented the unit tests, but quickly found that they
were failing my expectation of having a size of 256 items. Some of them
did contain 256 items and some did not. I looked up various resources
and figured that they indeed all need to have 256 items. One of the good
resources is https://github.com/davidben/poppler/blob/master/poppler/FontEncodingTables.cc
Aside from some missing `notdef` (empty string) entries at the end of
the arrays, which I assume causes issues since it may cause
out-of-bounds array access which in JavaScript gives `undefined`, there
was a `notdef` entry missing in the `MacExpertEncoding`, causing the
entries after that to be shifted. This fix for this is similar to the
one in #8589.
The unit tests verify that, for known encoding names, the return value
is not only an array, but that it is also of the right length and
contains only strings.
The PDF file in the issue uses a number of *embedded* versions of Lucida fonts, but for some reason does *not* embed the LucidaSans-Demi font. According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucida#Usages that one should be bold, so we can at least improve rendering here (even though it won't look perfect).
Fixes 9291.
I recall being confused as to the purpose of the `encrypted` property all the way back when working on PR 4750.
Looking at the history, this property was added in PR 1698 when password support was added to the API/viewer. However, its only purpose seem to have been to facilitate the addition of a `isEncrypted` function in the API. That function never, as far as I can tell, saw any use and was unceremoniously removed in PR 4144.
Since we want to avoid sending all non-essential data early during initial document loading (e.g. PR 4750), it seems correct to get rid of the `encrypted` property. Especially since it hasn't even been exposed in the API for over three years, with no complaints that I'm aware of.
Finally note that the `encrypt` property on the `XRef` instance isn't tied to the code that's being removed here. Given that we're calling `PDFDocument.parse` during `createDocumentHandler` in the worker which, via `PDFDocument.setup`, calls `XRef.parse` where the `Encrypt` data (if it exists) is always parsed.
This patch refactors the searching for 'endobj', to try and find the next occurance of "obj" and then check if it was in fact an 'endobj' and continue searching otherwise.
This approach is used to avoid having to first find 'endobj', and then re-check the entire contents of the object and having to run (potentially expensive) regular expressions on arbitrary long strings.
Fixes 9105.
