Some PDF files contain JavaScript actions that consist of nothing more that one, or possibly several, empty string(s). At least to me, printing a warning/showing the fallback seems completely unnecessary in that case.
Furthermore, this patch also makes use of an early `return`, so that we no longer will attempt to check for printing instructions when no JavaScript is present in the PDF file.
*Note:* It would perhaps make sense to change the API/core code, such that we ignore empty entries there instead. However, that would probably be considered a breaking changing with respect to backwards compatibility, hence this simple viewer only solution.
Fixes 5767.
I don't know if this is a regression, but I noticed earlier today that depending on the initial scale *and* sidebar state, the `annotationLayer` of the first rendered page may end up duplicated; please see screen-shot below.
[screen-shot]
I can reproduce this reliable with e.g. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1112.0542v1.pdf#zoom=page-width&pagemode=bookmarks.
When the document loads, rendering of the first page begins immediately. When the sidebar is then opened, that forces re-rendering which thus aborts rendering of the first page.
Note that calling `PDFPageView.draw()` will always, provided an `AnnotationLayerFactory` instance exists, call `AnnotationLayerBuilder.render()`. Hence the events described above will result in *two* such calls, where the actual annotation rendering/updating happens asynchronously.
For reasons that I don't (at all) understand, when multiple `pdfPage.getAnnotations()` promises are handled back-to-back (in `AnnotationLayerBuilder.render()`), the `this.div` property seems to not update in time for the subsequent calls.
This thus, at least in Firefox, result in double rendering of all annotations on the first page.
Obviously it'd be good to find out why it breaks, since it *really* shouldn't, but this patch at least provides a (hopefully) acceptable work-around by ignoring `getAnnotations()` calls for `AnnotationLayerBuilder` instances that we're destroying (in `PDFPageView.reset()`).
*It appears that this accidentally broken in PR 8775.*
Note that `PDFHistory.forward` is only used with certain named actions, and these aren't that commonly used, which ought to explain why this error managed to sneak in.
Steps to reproduce the issue (and verify the fix):
1. Navigate to e.g. http://mirrors.ctan.org/info/lshort/english/lshort.pdf
2. Click on a couple of links, or outline items, such that the history is populated with a few entries.
3. In the console, execute `PDFViewerApplication.pdfHistory.back()` one or more times, thus navigating back to a previous viewer position.
4. In the console, execute `PDFViewerApplication.pdfHistory.forward() one or more times.
At the last step above, no (forward) navigation happens with the current `master`; now compare with this patch.
Moreover, adjust one linked test case that did not conform to the
standard Web Archive URL format and adjust one linked test case because
the link was dead.
To support this, the following changes have to be made as well:
- Ignore `package-lock.json` since NPM creates it, but we should not
have it in the repository.
- Switch from `babel-preset-es2015` to `babel-preset-env` to resolve
the deprecation warning in the test logs. The latter is more recent
and flexible, but should be the same functionality-wise.
- `transform` now needs to have the `utf-8` encoding option provided.
If not given, it will call the callback with a `Buffer` object,
which results in an unhandled promise rejection since what is
returned from the callback is a string, not a `Buffer`.
This patch makes use of the existing `ignoreErrors` property in `src/core/evaluator.js`, see PRs 8240 and 8441, thus allowing us to attempt to recovery as much as possible of a page even when it contains broken XObjects.
Fixes 8702.
Fixes 8704.
Split the existing `PDFFunction` in two classes, a private `PDFFunction` and a public `PDFFunctionFactory``, and utilize the latter in `PDFDocument` to allow various code to access the methods of `PDFFunction`
*Follow-up to PR 8909.*
This requires us to pass around `pdfFunctionFactory` to quite a lot of existing code, however I don't see another way of handling this while still guaranteeing that we can access `PDFFunction` as freely as in the old code.
Please note that the patch passes all tests locally (unit, font, reference), and I *very* much hope that we have sufficient test-coverage for the code in question to catch any typos/mistakes in the re-factoring.
The `inline` parameter is passed to a number of methods/functions in `PDFImage`, despite not actually being used. Its value is never checked, nor is it ever assigned to the current `PDFImage` instance (i.e. no `this.inline = inline` exists).
Looking briefly at the history of this code, I was also unable to find a point in time where `inline` was being used.
As far as I'm concerned, `inline` does nothing more than add clutter to already very unwieldy method/function signatures, hence why I'm proposing that we just remove it.
To further simplify call-sites using `PDFImage`/`NativeImageDecoder`, a number of methods/functions are changed to take Objects rather than a bunch of (somewhat) randomly ordered parameters.
I don't have a good example at hand right know, but I recall seeing custom deployments of PDF.js that bundle a *specific* version of the `build/pdf.js` file and then set `PDFJS.workerSrc` to point to https://mozilla.github.io/pdf.js/build/pdf.worker.js.
That practice seems really bad since, besides (obviously) causing unnecessary server load, it will very quickly result in a version mismatch between the `pdf.js` and `pdf.worker.js` files in those PDF.js deployments.
Such a version mismatch could easily lead to either breaking errors, or even worse slightly inconsistent behaviour for an API call (if the API -> Worker interface changes, which does happen from time to time).
To avoid the problems described above, I'm thus proposing that we enforce that the versions of the `pdf.js` and `pdf.worker.js` files must always match.
